Jump to content

peterpan

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,992
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by peterpan

  1. I want Mike Evans!! Or Clowney! Or Manzeil! But I think those other two would be gone.
  2. I think he was reading my posts from a while back. Evans, Richardson, Niklas are my three guys I want lol
  3. why would anyone want to take a T at 9 when we can find studs like Glenn in the 40s? Find another stud OL guy in the 40s or 70s this year and draft another position at 9!
  4. I think the point is - if you are a 3-4 team hire a 3-4 coach, and vica versa.
  5. The rookie the Pats replaced Spikes with looked like an All Pro in his starts. I dont expect a drop off at ILB, I expect a huge improvement.
  6. He wasnt a good fit in their cover 2 scheme.
  7. I followed it completely except, Im not sure who kelly is...
  8. The patsie killed us on the ground. Something was wrong in that game. Was that one where Dareus was benched? He hurt us by not being in there those two games. I agree though, we fix our offense and it will help our run D better than anything we could do on D.
  9. He could be our Spiller!!! errr
  10. I remember many members here wanted him. I didn't get it. Just like Maybin. What people see if these guys I will never understand.
  11. Who says the player you take at 9 is going to be better than the player you take after trading back? Dareus is great and all but if we traded back for an extra 2nd and still landed JJ Watt I would have been much happier I would also argue - who are the superstars that lead Seattle to the Superbowl this year? I don't think you could name just 2-3, their whole team is filled with quality players. Every one is good and they are a team that won, not a few elite players.
  12. The guy just played 8 season for the Browns, do you really think he will want to come to the Bills? Sounds more like the replacement for Spikes in NE to me.
  13. I personally dont think Mosley is the type of playmaker we should be getting in the top 10. On D there is Clowney, Barr, and Mack (3) At QB I have to believe at least 2 of the big 3 will be drafted (5) There are two good Tackles (7) And two good WRs (9) We are going to end up with a stud at DE/OLB, WR, or T (heck maybe even QB?) There is no need to reach for Mosley IMO. Its the QB. That is the difference
  14. TE is a deep position this year and other teams don't value it highly, which means we can still get a stud in the 2nd or 3rd. I think we should draft our own Julio Jones while we can (Mike Evans) and see what TE falls to us the 2nd round.
  15. Let me address Evan's most prevalent concern - that he cannot get separation - somewhat jokingly. WHO CARES Throw it up to him and let the DB get a pass interference penalty. I also don't believe that separation will be a problem for him. Yes this is a highlight video, but its just one game worth of plays and Evans gets plenty of separation early - not because of Manziel scrambling. Plus, I think its a benefit that Evans works to get open once the play breaks down, and does it so well, instead of just giving up like a lot of players do.
  16. I really like the Nicolas TE from Notre Dame. He is HUGE and athletic. Talk about a mismatch!
  17. I draft Mike Evans at 9. He is the kind of target an inaccurate passer like Manual needs to be successful. We also need to find Manuel a TE. If one of the 'big three' falls the the 2nd, we need to jump on them right away. Stevie is too good to get rid of. Just like Marshawn has, SJ would prove us wrong to move him now.
  18. Targeted only 58 times when he was the 3rd, and often times the 2nd, WR? Stevie missed 4 games and Woods missed 2, that means TJ started 6 games. That in inexcusable right there! And, is pretty good proof that he cannot get open. Then when he does get open, he can't catch it. We need to draft Mike Evans, then promote Goodwin (he produces) and banish TJ to the bench
  19. I think that if the Patriots are at the end of a close game, they will instantly be the supposed victim of a racial slur which will change the outcome of the game, in the Patsies* favor of course.
  20. Mike Evans at 9. Game. Set. Match. We found a stud of a LT in the 2nd round, there will be plenty of Ts to take later on. No RT will affect a game the way Mike Evans will. When is Antonio Richardson projected to go? He looks like a stud RT to me... We also need a TE. Really really badly. Get one of those too
  21. The Patsies would take that trade in a heartbeat. Then Stevie would play in the slot and go on to get 110 catches for 10 TDs. Then you would b*tch about the Bills trading him. Stevie's biggest problem is the QB throwing him the ball.
  22. Chandler is the 2nd, maybe even 3rd string TE on a team that makes it to a conference championship game. He is not good enough. I'll leave it at that.
  23. Lots of good college tackles get moved to G and excell. Levitre for one, Carl Nicks for another, Jahri Evans for a third. I could go on. I want to try that with an NFL T who may not be dominant at T, but still good. Why couldn't a guy like that move inside and be much better? They do it from College to the NFL, why not NFL to NFL.
  24. He could be a two down LB and just blitz him a lot if the other team passes:-)
  25. The biggest problem with our OL, is our QB. Regardless of who was back there, they struggled with reads, held the ball too long, and got sacked. They QB also makes a lot of run calls and audibles, many of which I am sure where messed up, and resulted in blown plays. But we still don't have a big WR or a TE, both of which will help our QB.
×
×
  • Create New...