yall

Edit/correction: Evidently for the last few games they have been blocking people from turning right, effectively allowing no westbound traffic between the field house and Abbott. We've had no problem in the past but perhaps that's because we tend to linger. Apologies for any confusion.

Gimme a break She's posting this with a layer of makeup caked on her face so thick that it shields her from gamma rays.

I'm not looking past Denver, but Baltimore is hot, and if we have to face them, they're our biggest hurdle to the Superbowl. KC just doesn't scare me.

I must say (in my best Ed Grimley voice ) that I'm genuinely surprised by the price of tickets on Ticketmaster and the apparent lack of demand for a home playoff game. I've spoken with a number of people who said they we're saving their money and time for the division round, which I can understand but at the same time it's the playoffs and nothing is guaranteed. Are we that spoiled now with a 5-5 record in the playoffs over the last few years, that a wild card game at home during what is relatively mild weather (by WNY in January standards anyway) just isn't that big of a draw?

While the outcomes of any draft are obviously not guaranteed, there is a certain value associated with each pick. I can't say the OP is accurate in that Bass intentionally missed, but I would say that generally speaking, it's of more value for an organization to have the #1 overall versus #4. Knowing that, depriving a division opponent of the #1 at zero cost to your own organization only makes sense.

All kidding aside, one has to wonder why the Pats could have allowed or even remotely wanted that outcome.

They did in fact explicitly state that "this is not a terrorist event" in the beginning. Plenty of links if you look for the statement by FBI special agent Alethea Duncan. They would have been better off just saying "under investigation" or something other than making a proclamation without the benefit of having more information.

It's not even coincidence. It's just bad luck. A bug in your wine isn't anything that resembles irony.

Still seems to have nothing to do with immigration/border, certainly not in the context of this thread. He was a US born citizen, driving a rented truck with Texas plates.

I mean he's a US Army vet, so not exactly sure how this relates to our pourous border.

Yeah forum rules notwithstanding (I'm not too wound up about the unsourced quoting) it shows the type of person that poster is, especially sticking to their guns after being called out.

Yeah I saw it. Pretty clear as to what the motivation was. Interestingly, the New Orleans police chief called it terrorism immediately. The FBI (in the same press conference) said it wasn't. Now they are changing their tune, because, we'll they have to.

Pretty sure as details come out the "Islamic Terrorism" thread is gonna get a bump...

Saturday at 1 is my dream scenario.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/12/30/musk-loomer-h1b-visas-trump-bannon/ Completely plagiarized from the above link. Pretty on-brand for the left these days.

And a 1:00 kickoff. Thank goodness for small favors....

Expedient trial followed by a public hanging for these types of heinous acts.

In this case the "madman" was an illegal immigrant from Guatemala.

When I saw the initial post on Facebook and read the address I knew one of them lived down there. For some reason I thought it was Knox.

The WNBA seems to just be a group of the whiniest, self-centered #######s this side of Oasis.

It's only cool to do this if you're a female in the Olympics.

That's why I question the veracity of the reports. It's hard for an untrained, casual observer to tell direction, size, etc. They may not be over an airport for example. You probably being a flyer saw they finally determined the navy videos of the UFOs around San Diego were likely explainable via parallax effect.

It's a head scratcher for sure. If they aren't actively involved, I'm willing to bet they know who is, and based on some of the reports, there seems to be a reasonable assumption that there is at the very least a safety issue relative to shared airspace, if not an actual national security concern. Which to me at least, begs the question; why isn't more being said/done? I'm trying to come up with a reasonable explanation and I keep coming back to some commercial grade testing or some hobbiests having a lark.

Once the details are out I presume this will prove to be observer error.

Maybe Sherpa could add more, but there are absolutely a number of anti-drone and drone detection systems (including certain radar systems that can distinguish between drones and birds) that I would be surprised to find aren't being employed here. That in turn leads me to believe this is probably something of our own doing. If China or Iran were launching drones en masse over sensitive areas, after a day or two I think we'd have a good idea regarding where they were being launched and by whom.