yall

Oh good one, you really got me there. I was just trying to show there is not one measurable category in which Clinton leads (unless you can somehow measure corruption). Oh wait - you can measure that, and in fact, she is solely in 1st: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story...e_queen_of_pork

No - Florida and MI disenfranchised themselves when they decided to break the party primary rules. It had nothing to do with the candidates. The only !@#$ here aside from the FL and MI Dem party idiots who put themselves into this mess, is the one candiate that decided to stay on the ballot and engage in the asshatery... (any guesses...???) But obviously she can do no wrong in your book.

Um, you know that he actually leads in popular votes, states won, and delegates, right? Because only a ninny would count popular votes in states where the only two choices were 'Clinton' and 'Undecided'.

Probably. But if I have to eat a chicken wing thats been sitting on the floor, I'll take the one that barely violates the 5 second rule, as opposed to the moldy one with dirt and spider eggs all over it.

How did I know you would respond first? I should have just sent you and BF a PM...

My wife wants me to make copies of her favorite exercise DVD's so that she can have a set in the living room and in the basement as she works out in both locations. I was hoping someone knew of a good freeware package that could burn usuable copies. I can do this either on a Mac or PC platform. Thanks in advance. And thanks for sparing me the "if she wants to work out, what is wrong with walking up and down the stairs to get the DVD's?". I've already gone down that path...

Believe me, I have plenty of ire for them as well. But then again, they sell the stojan, and we eat it. Who is to blame?

It appears that the clip was pulled - see PastaJoe's post about the Clinton campaign calling foul, saying it was a forgery. I wanted to watch it again myself to see if that was the case, but it looks like it has pretty much been pulled from all of the major news sites. At one point in time it was on Drudge and ABC, but they both have dropped it as well. He is in one very crucial way - he is nowhere near dirty as the Clintons. I don't know that point can be made with empirical evidence, but I'm willing to bet most of us think its true. Voting to confiscate guns in a state of emergency is not a responsible position, especially in the eyes of those who understand the rationale behind the second amendment. In fact one could quite reasonably argue that a state of emergency is exactly the type of situation for which the 2nd amendment is designed. There is no mention of hunting or collecting in the constitution. So it's either hypocrisy or naivety on her part.

Haven't they had like 17 debates already? How many more do you need to convince you who to vote for, unless you have been living under a rock. Given Clinton's history of being an outright fkin liar, I can't beleive anyone in their right mind would take a word she says at face value. She lies. Every day. (They all do, but she does it way more often and has no regard for the truth) Why you think for a second that any policy she claims to support right now is the one that will be enacted if she is in office is a mystery.

Dude, she doesn't change her opinions over the course of years, she does it over the course of days. I always suspected she had a d*ck. Now I can clearly see it's firmly planted in your mouth.

She paints herself as pro-gun during the Pennsylvania primary and yet voted "Yea" on a bill to allow firearms to be confiscated during a state of emergency. (Obama voted "Nay") She was for NAFTA, then against it. She was pro bringing jobs to WNY and anti-outsourcing. The first (and only) company she welcomes to WNY? An Indian outsourcing firm. I'm against torture - but also for it: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2...bill___her.html "I stand for ending the war in Iraq, bringing our troops home." followed by "We’re going to have troops remaining there, guarding our embassy. We may have a continuing training mission, and we may have a mission against Al Qaida in Iraq. " It goes on and on PastaJoe. You can defend her all you like, it just serves to highlight the kool-aid stain circling your mouth.

Not talking honestly about policy = not talking policy.

All politicians do it. I was merely taking exception to the fact that someone felt she was actually honest about something. She is the worst of the worst and I cannot wait to see her lose. My only fear is that when this goes to convention, and Obama wins the nomination, and them loses to McCain, we will see her again in 2012. We can only hope that NY'ers will wise up and not elect a Senator who will spend more time looking to the next job and less time focusing on the needs of their constituents. (Wishful thinking...)

Apparently you didn't watch the debate moderated by former Clinton staffer Stephanopolis. Because Obama was trying to talk about issues, and the fist 45 minutes was "So Senator America-hater, tell us how much less you love America than Senator Clinton?" Also, yeah she does talk about policy, and her stance (as well as her accent) differs depending on the crowd or circumstances. Lying about what you would do from a policy standpoint, should not be construed as an honest dialogue on policy.

The Clinton campaign has been running amok by doing everything they can to obfuscate any conversation regarding real policy, and instead hammer their opponent on matters entirely unrelated to real issues. In other words, maybe going down in flames in Indiana because of something someone she knows said in 1992 would be entirely ironic/appropriate.

Whwn did you begin the slow evolution towards becomg ieatcrayonz? Seriously though, I erally hope the press runs with it. It would be karma in the form of "live by the sword, die by the sword".

Bill Clinton Campaign Chairman and Hillary Clinton '08 Advisor Mickey Kantor tells George Stephanapoulos and James Carville: "Look at Indiana...it doesn't matter if we win. Those people are sh--. How would you like to be a worthless white ni**er?" http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Clinton_...ss_White_Ni_ers Even though it's old, I hope this gets some play and is enough to derail her.

I think it was an event for the Bills Backers. Am I correct?

The list was borderline retarded and the writer should be shot. Half of them weren't even "hair bands" for cryin out loud.

Everytime I see the name of that town I read it as "Tampon Strings".

Maybe he knew that Wacka hated a certain book and had lined it up to shoot it...

So it's all serious business until your points are refuted, and then it's emoticons? I used to feel bad for the way people seemed to gang up on you, but now I fully understand their frustrations.

Dude, it's all Bush's fault...

So? When you sign up for the military, you sign up to be used by your particular branch of service however said branch may choose. If the Army feels they get more value out of someone because of their recruiting potential, so be it. When I was stationed in Korea, in a frontline infantry unit's recon platoon, I was recruited for the US Army Soldier show as a guitar player. I toured the country partly to entertain the soldiers, but also to help spread goodwill among the locals. The Army felt I was better serving their needs that way, and it was their decision. Same in this case. Now go start some anti-Bush thread, or get a better understanding of the reality of the situation. Better yet, STFU... edit: Also, since you are so quick to comment on how the Army should operate, perhaps you could enlighten us as to your military experience?

That just goes to show you have no understanding of the topic at hand. He isn't skipping out- the Army changed the conditions of his commitment.