Bigfatbillsfan

:lol:

What we should be taking away from this event is that the "stand your ground" law needs to be tweaked at the very least. Imagine if you were that the opposite of what happened happened. Let say GZ didn't get to his gun in time and TM beet him to death there on the sidewalk. Should TM get off with nothing? after all, he would have been "standing his ground" wouldn't he? Once that fight started who ever ended up killing the other could claim self defense under "stand your ground". The law needs to be tweaked. Not removed, just tweaked. *beat* not beet. !@#$ you dyslexia. !@#$ you right to hell!

How is that different from you now?

Oh dear god, you are so, so confused.

Hey, remember when I didn't do those things but you guys were so !@#$ing retarded you claimed I did? Yes, the town has a history of racism that feeds into public reaction. Now you've gone and confused yourselves so much that don't can't even remember who killed who.

None taken. I'm not an DA prosecuting the case. I though we needed more investigation into the matter and we got it. The DA thinks they have a case. Let's see if they can make their case. Besides spelling aggressor wrong... Doesn't Martin have the right to stand his ground? That's the problem I see with the law here.

Is this one of the people that like to correct my spelling and grammar?

Are you the one that's always accusing me of not having a sense of humor? I'm not basing my arguments on my great spelling and grammar. That's a joke by the way. I've never claimed to have even decent spelling and grammar.

Never mind, your still correcting spelling and grammar.

Zimmerman is being accused of a crime. Martin is not. Do you need someone to draw you a picture? An unarmed teenager laying dead in a side yard, shot by a guy that got out of his car to follow him because he looked suspicious. Getting your ass kicked in a fight isn't an excuse for killing someone.

You may want to go back and read what I said again. That wasn't all I had to say. The case is not over. Let's let the trial play out. From what I have read over the past year, most eyewitnesses claim that Martin struck first, but why? The number one thing I called for was further investigation of the case when it looked like the local police force dropped the ball. (and they did) Now we've had further investigation. That doesn't mean GZ is guilty of murder.

Well, we could start arguing semantics, but I would say it's a person who may, or may not run.

Using their food stamps to buy guns maybe?

Wow, I'm surprised you didn't correct my grammar. But getting to the point: I think the father is correct in saying that the reasons for his dismissal are an excuse. But looking at the situation as a whole we need to understand that the coach is (or at least should be) making decisions that are best for the team as a whole and not for one perspective runner. The kids a Sophomore and the coach might have felt that his particular strengths fit nicely into an area where the team was weak and plugged him in there rather than place him as another competitor in a race where the team is already strong. Sounds like the kid was making enough of a stink about it to distract the team from competition. So once again, the coach makes a decision to take him off the team.

Wow, there's some parents that are going to make their kid's life suck.

I am serious. And please, don't call me Shirley.

I think we all know when crayonz is posting.

From this you draw that I'm an idiot? You're a very special person. I'm going to miss listening to your horseshit when I return to work. The members here are quite lucky that a person with your kind of intellectual superiority would bend down to grace them with your holy presence. You're a published physicist I mention CCM and you just happen to have copy if Siguara's paper on your desk, you know, like most physicists would I guess. Climate change debate, what a coincidence you were just exchanging e-mails with a climate scientist. You're also an expert in statistics ...that doesn't know what propter hoc correlation means (but I'm sure you discuss this every day with with experts in the field of statistics.)I'm sure an e-mail just came in. You're so incredibly smart that you can look at someone that held the Lucasian professorship of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge and say: "eh, overrated". You also claim that the Earth's orbit does not change over time regardless of countless papers and articles written astronomers, physicists, and other scientists that claim it does. I'm sure they are wrong, and you are right. All this and you can spend your entire day posting on a message board? Unbelievable. And I mean the literally. You're unbelievable. You're full of ****.

Really? I think I might be in trouble... ACL surgery. But yeah, after reading half the **** you guys seem to post on a daily basis, it kind of feels like I just had one.

Did he look behind the couch? Sometimes a newspaper can fall behind the couch.

Hey, you know, in the past two weeks I've been on here a lot since I've been home from work recovering from surgery. I've learned some things that have turned everything I was ever taught in my past 36 years of life on it's head. I've learned that consensus isn't science Correlation isn't causation The government is running an extortion racket to pay for the inexhaustible resources ...that it doesn't have The Earth's orbit doesn't change over time Tom lives in a hospital If all this can be true, Weiner could win the election.

Are you !@#$ing serious?

I would rather vote for an actual wiener (sp) than Anthony Weiner.

Tom has given us his firmly stated opinion. As we all know, this constitutes fact. I'm pretty sure most of those are not news papers. They are tabloids. But yes, pretty chilling stuff. You have to love the Islamic extremest mindset.

I love this board. Way better than the Politics board on the official site. It's allows my combative personality to shine! I still pop over there every once in a while just to see how it is. And it's totally turned into a pussyfest. (not the good kind)