Bigfatbillsfan

Freddy has more power plain and simple. Spiller is great in open space. But when you need a power runner you look to Freddy. Not to mention CJ is a little beat up right now and putting him in at the goal line is a good way to get him hurt worse. While I still hold to my above post I do agree that Spiller should not be eliminated from any goal line situation.

If a QB needs less snaps to be ready I would argue they would be more likely to be a starter than a serviceable backup. There's something coaching sees in Tuel that they want to develop otherwise he'd have been on the street after his performance in Cleveland. If they believe they can develop him into a serviceable backup he's going to need more snaps with the first team. But as Pearl pointed out: How do we do that without taking snaps away from our starter? There's no question the Bills are a mess at QB. I have a feeling the reason we're so far under the cap is they are using this year as a rebuilding year to see where that money needs to be spent in the future. At least that's the only reason I would think they would be so far under the cap. I think it's obvious some of that money needs to go to the QB position in the next off season.

Sounds like half your posts in PPP LOL. Just kidding with ya B-man. You know I love ya!. I still think the Bills are the improving team while the jets struggle to stay consistent with their play.

Yes, but the jets are not consistent. Plus I think they are looking at things on paper. The Bills have better players... on paper. The jets have a better team. While the Bills seem to be improving, albite very slowly, the jets are great one week and suck then next. I think the Bills are going to be the better team in the long run. And EJ was the right pick.

Yes, yes they are.

Manuel hasn't played 9 games. So we really can't compare the two yet. I think EJ is the better long term option.

Sorry i screwed up this posting earlier but here's to trying again. I think we all agree that Tuel had a much better showing today than he did against Cleveland. Though it is obvious that he still has a long way to go. I agree that part of the problem in Cleveland was weather/hostile stadium. But how much was it due to him not getting enough snaps with the first team in practice the week leading up? I know that we need to develop EJ Manuel as much as possible but should that come at the expense of developing decent and serviceable backups in people like Tuel? So the main point of this thread is how much of a back QB's performance comes from the amount of snaps in practice with the first team. How can we expect a backup to come in a win a game for us if they don't have the timing and gel that they need with the first team?

I don't know if i'd go as far as to say he sucks, but he shouldn't be the starter. He's a solid #2.

Chiefs are the better team, but we played them pretty well for what it's worth.

If this leads to a single payer system all the better. Because that's what this abortion of a bill should have been. A single payer plan.

This proves it. The GOP is right. More tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans is the only way to go. How are the rest of us supposed to get jobs in the coming years if they aren't pulling in at least 22% of the income?

It would appear I have hit the wrong quote button. It was supposed to be Chef's "is it to late to change it"

Sorry, you're already on record.

I said nothing of the sort. Asserting the straw man again.

Written by a person who spoke English as a first language? Or Russian? Or Japanese? Because all the people in this article do not speak English as a first language we know there has to be some translating going on. And therefore a possibility that something is lost in translation. Talk to Tom about that one. I didn't drag it off the rails.

Yes but at least takeyoutotasker has a few working brain cells, isn't lying about what he is, and puts forth something that could be considered an argument.

I know you did. That's why I actually have to think before replying to your post. Tom already halfway down the river.

Probably one of the better arguments I've heard regarding Syria.

This still does not address my argument. Keep asserting the straw mans Tom. Tom seems to think he's God...

That's racist

Though I'm enjoying going on this straw man tangent to see what bull **** you're going to assert you still haven't addressed the fact that my argument is that what the article claims is lost in translation. Not whether or not The Voice of Russia is or is not a Russian site. And by the way, it is a Russian site. Oh, and I almost forgot: you're the first person on the board her to demonstrate functional illiteracy in more than one language. Amazing.

I do. You obviously don't.

If that's really the case. We don't have much to worry about.

"The Voice of Russia" is not a Russian site. Wow go figure. Wow you are really an idiot. And a !@#$ing moron. And a Wednesday.

Holy ****, Now you know "some Russian" now? :w00t: You're either a regular Einstein or a total poser and liar. You can guess which one I'm leaning towards can't you. The fact that it was posted in English on a Russian site is very relevant. Wait, are you telling me that we can somehow "catch" energy that falls from the sky?