unbillievable

#5 would be problematic if people start basing their treatment on the lowest bidder. It would have the consequence of increasing everyone's cost from skyrocketing malpractice insurance. A better solution would be to standardize procedures and prices, so the general preference would be decided by availability, and not affordability. Maybe even a profit sharing system similar to the NFL model. Instead of single payer, how about single provider? I know it would stifle competition, but how many people actually shop for hospitals?

Why do people hate tacos? I love tacos.

Hilary Because I want the war with women to heat up.

The wall would still be cheaper than anything Obama has attempted.

This could have been prevented if they had upgraded the school to a super double secret gun free zone.

I wanted to know what was on the terrorist's itunes playlist.

Only a billion dollars? How much money does the race baiters, abortionists, and climate alarmists get from the liberal justices?

Have you noticed that most liberal websites have taken down the comments section on their articles? They can't keep their readers in the bubble if the complete story comes out.

Shame on everyone for knowing what those shapes are...

It died with the king

So we'd be able to trade with the Ferengi Commerce Authority.

A reporter shoves a Secret Service agent and tells him to F*** off, then gets his a##% kicked. The media blames Trump for the "attack" on the paparazzi. https://www.yahoo.com/politics/security-at-trump-event-choke-1375771344773174.html

The reality of Capitalist countries is that they're often vulnerable to devastating financial crashes. On the other hand, most Socialist countries are too poor to notice the difference.

My Parents always kept a shotgun behind the door and one in the master bathroom. I wasn't taught how to handle them. I've never shot a gun. It never occurred to me to ask since we weren't allowed to touch them anyway. As far as I was concerned, they were part of the decor (like my mom's commemorative plate collection. -something else I wasn't allowed to touch)

Better to have one and never need it, than to need it and not have one.

You never pee in the bushes. There's a splatter problem.

Would it make it better if there was a Judge Dredd gun that could replace an arsenal? One gun is better than many?

A few years ago, I told my conservative friends that I would vote for Hilary. I think voting for Trump would annoy them more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pydUfffjZ4 Just discovered this guy. He's a comedian who trolls liberals with facts. Gavin Mcinnes min: 6:40

It's a duplicate organization because it only takes one rational conservative voice to dispute the sea of liberal rants. If you've ever watched some of these debates, they usually host one calm conservative stating facts, while three (or more) liberals shriek and comfort each other on the validity of their feelings on the subject.

I knew a older couple who would only eat fruit that has fallen from the tree. They were rich, but looked malnourished. -Owned orchards and sold art. Also, they were crazy. (literally, the guy had hallucinations, and talked to imaginary people. His wife accepted his visions as real. They were friendly though. Gave me free golf balls)

I think that was already offered. (By more than just Apple) The government insists on being given the method to do it themselves to "preserve the evidence."

Don’t you remember the science being settled? . You can tell it's falsified data when the model is changed to match up and down trends in the past, but becomes more linear later on. They tried to make it look like their guesses were previously accurate, when they were just as wrong then too. How can we trust any "science" that has to continously adjust data to match their theory. Real scientists would have adjusted their theory to match the data.

He probably saw "%1" and immediately thought Trump.

They have to bribe people to live in Alaska.