34-78-83

38 spots... so OVER a full round, not half a round.

People saying we helped KC are really that dense? We got equal trade value per the Rich Hill value chart and turned a 4th into a 3rd rd pick. KC would have drafted Worthy where they sat or even in the 29,30 or 31 spot. The Bills didn't want Worthy. We went all of 4 spots back.... oh no!

Yes we did in fact it was almost a dead even match. The value #’s differed by 1 point

Clowns, look at your own polls on who to take if you had your choice with the Bills staying at 28 or trading back? Worthy was what, 20% of the share? Now KC has him and we still pick 4 picks later and gained a 3rd rounder and its freakout time...smdh

down 4 spots. Plenty of WR left. We got a 3rd now. What's not to like?

It was beyond predictable that so many of you would act as if you all thought Xavier 160 lb Worthy was the next Randy Moss just as soon as KC picked him.

BPA might be a DB or Newton, yikes

Yep and he also believes momentum in sports competition to be a fairy tale, which anyone who has played organized team sports can tell you is bs.

He actually said on yesterday's show how trading way up would be the stupidest idea possible, and that math backs that up.... I disagree with him, but that's his take.

As the draft rapidly approaches, all I can say to everyone is to learn from the past. Learn from the Josh Allen selection. NONE of us know more than the teams spending thousands of man hours on these guys, not only on the field, but how these guys fit to their teams, what their mental and medical situations are, how much of a risk the teams are willing to take on a guy, etc. Also none of us INCLUDING the teams know if any of these guys will work out in the league. The pre-draft rankings you have or agree with out there probably don't come too close to matching any other team's draft board, especially as you get out of the 1st 20 prospects. Sure there are players with higher odds than others... Resist drawing your lines in the sand where you claim either "Super Bowl here we come!" or "This team is doomed and set back 5 years!" after your team's selection. You have no idea of that. The league turns over much faster than it used to in terms of rosters. Take the choices that are made and try to reason why they were, and know that a whole organization is behind the decision. There are going to be "sure thing" players who end up failing, along with RAS score 1.5 players who shine in the game. Bottom line, try to enjoy the draft.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/K/KaesKe20/gamelog/2003/

Traded 28 plus next year's 1 and the 2 we got from the Diggs trade.

Many people are underselling XL because of what they've parroted from other people, and that's fine. I also suspect the "intellect concerns" could wrongly be tied to something as silly as him having a strong southern dialect. A one trick pony he is NOT. Watch the all-snaps video. Anyway, 1st round picks are for athletic traits and upside in my opinion. I do think LM is going to be a reliable, consistent separator and fine player and would be happy to get him as well, just not my preference. If he is part of a "double dip" at WR I'd be ecstatic. I am not one of those "this guy is great, so this other guy sucks" people that are so common on forums.

well good on the Bills if we can get enough negative talk about BTJ to have him slide closer or even all the way to 28!

I'm swinging for a home run, so I'm taking Legette.

I think most serious football fans in these type of discussions know that teams play a lot more zone now. What some here are referring to in most cases when they reference needing a WR who can beat man is our need to have players that are able to win vs the clutching and grabbing type man coverage that is legalized (unwritten rule) in the NFL playoffs every year. Credit folks like @BADOLBILZ for pointing this out many times previously. With that said it comes down to those folks wanting a type of WR that can consistently win against those tactics. After that, it comes down to trying to judge these draft prospects in that area. I am not sold that looking purely at their numbers vs man or press man in college alone are going to provide those complete answers. Sometimes its a little more obvious than that, ie. some athleticism/size combinations just win more easily vs those tactics.

Nailed it!

Yep, of course...That kinda goes without saying. My point was just going off of trade capital and value charts

Going all in on the trade up (2 1's and 2 2's) for Odunze. Happy with the depth as well.

you can get from 28 to 8 with this years and next years 1st rounders and 2nd rounders. Sure, thats a lot! But you don't need to add in Josh

I definitely respect your opinion on draftees but I think we'll all end up seeing in the league that he's going to be very good vs press. I respect analytics as well (Harmon is a full on analytics guy) but its just pretty obvious to me that he's a guy a team is going to want out there to work against man clutching and grabbing in the NFL playoffs. We'll see how it shakes out!... I feel quite confident on it. Edit - to add - I should have said suddenness for his size

Yep, along with the ability to win vs press man in the NFL playoffs, which is what the Bills haven't had this whole time. His physicality and suddenness would give us that.

Murphy dropped to 28! I adjusted accordingly and dove back into rd 2 using capital from 2025 to secure the WR position.

Recall as well that many of the recent Bills picks did NOT have many visits with the team. I think its starting to get over-used as a predictor. Certainly it reflects interest, but how much beyond that is unclear. I agree on the Jacksonville concern.

dropping just 8 spots from 28 to 36 while picking up a 3rd is getting swindled? Sorry I don't understand... Now I get 3 total picks in the top 78 as opposed to 2, and again, only moved back 8 spots to get it. All good though, love ya Bill!