Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,159

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    Yes he is. Look at the #2's across the league. He's somewhere in the middle of that pack.
  2. 34-78-83
    Lots of 12 personnel coming ( 2 wr, 2 te, 1 rb), I love that! Peyton Manning offense which can dictate to the defense! If he pans out this is great for the offense.
  3. 34-78-83
    I ran to the podium in the 1st round on this one!
  4. 34-78-83
    Not being able to make the massive salary work with our almost entirely filled cap does not equal "sit on his hands". Classic short-sighted NFL fan commentary. As if you or I EVER have any idea how hard they try to make certain things happen.
  5. 34-78-83
  6. 34-78-83
  7. 34-78-83
    The 2011 Home Win vs the Pats. I was coaching for my son's pop-warner football team and tried to block out all of the Bills related commentary in the stands so I could watch the game on my dvr later that day. Everything was going fine until the PA announcer at the school said "the score was tied with less than a minute left in the Bills Patriots game" 😀 I still watched it of course!
  8. 34-78-83
    Reasonable reply even though I still wouldn't touch it. If that were the case though, they better then trade away Cook for some value for it to make any sense at all.
  9. 34-78-83
    Regardless of how good he is or where he lands, that move would make less than zero sense for the Bills with the QB they have, the offense they run with and the RB personnel they already have in place (Cook is perfect for this offense, and Harris can get needed yards). It would be amongst the worst drafting strategies in Bills history, and there have been some bad ones especially the ones outside of Beane and Polian.
  10. 34-78-83
    I looked at moving our 3 but ultimately didn't want to eat the additional cost of jumping into the 200 level.
  11. 34-78-83
    If it were the 90's Jim would be right. Unfortunately, that ship has sailed. Plus Cook is a pretty damn good back for the needs of this offense. Far underrated by fans (and Kelly apparently). And Harris can be that Rb2 we need for tough yeards. Please no on drafting an early RB or trading for one.
  12. 34-78-83
  13. 34-78-83
  14. 34-78-83
    I really like some of the lineman that should be available to us in this year's draft too. I just won't assume they'll acclimate to the NFL game as rookies. That's pretty rare. The recent 2 good OL the Chiefs picked took 2 years before they were playing consistently for example. Doesn't mean I wouldn't still draft them but...
  15. 34-78-83
    Having surgery this coming week. Torn ACL confirmed.
  16. 34-78-83
  17. 34-78-83
    enough of your facts. You and the OP are doing a very good job of this all while maintaining composure. What I find the most funny here is the assumption that most responders seem to be making - that you think DS should start over James Cook (I presume that not to be the case bc why would he right??) You are merely saying that DS is a solid back that is quite good at making people miss. A good fit for RB2 if the right price is reached. But but but 4th and 1! Yeah QB's do those now, people.
  18. 34-78-83
    On a team that needs multiple WR's in the stable to achieve their goal, you don't trade one or 2 of them away (especially Gabe lol who is a good not great WR2 that had a year of too many drops) to get another one. You try to acquire them and make Gabe your #3 or 2B. Silly peoples.
  19. 34-78-83
    I presume nothing happens until the Josh and possibly Von contract restructures occur aye?
  20. 34-78-83
    for the and knee-jerk detractors or those in panic - this thread from one of our local cap experts helps describe the situation with Hines -
  21. 34-78-83
    right?
  22. 34-78-83
    From NFL mock draft database - not sure how realistic but I'd be happy
  23. 34-78-83
  24. 34-78-83
    I think the Eagles D and 49ers D have proven to have the same exact concerns stopping Mahomes and KC this year for example. Are you saying there is some defensive approach or alternative that ANY team can take in facing those elite offenses? I don't think it has anything to do with Edmunds when it comes to facing those type of offenses. All the D schemes and approaches out there seem to get beat just as easily. With that said I think it comes down to if Edmunds will accept a Mosley-esque type contract or a long extended contract as you mentioned or not. The Roquan contract would obviously be too much for the production.
  25. 34-78-83
    What defenses do well against the great offenses with any consistency in this era? (Its a trick question)
×
×
  • Create New...