Cinga

I said this before.. The simple fact that this is all second hand information means this guy/gal DOES NOT have whistleblower protections. We can all thank the Obama administration for that designation because it is how they punished whistleblowers during their years

Today is merely a liberal parody of National Pancake Day. The real one was back on March 12 https://www.ihop.com/en/national-pancake-day

Maybe a dumb question, but since when do we suspend all investigations of wrongdoing if someone is running for President? Political opponent my a55!! Biden did wrong, and just because he is running to oppose Trump does not mean you just drop inquiries into that wrongdoing! And let's see... how do you investigate wrongdoing in another country? Send in the FBI and have them forcefully get answers? Of course not! You go through the executive branch of the government and get permission and assistance from that country! Keep it up folks... This whole inquiry to hamstring Trump will haunt every POTUS of the future since someone, ANYONE in government could pull this same bullcrap. The WH phones will have to have a message "This call is being recorded and monitored because we have an intrusive Congress that insists on over reach to the Executive branch. You may be better off whispering in the POTUS ear during a photo op."

a start.....

Good movie on the history of gun control

Too easy... Here you go... https://www.powerball.com/

wtf does that have to do with protecting his/her identity?

You are Sooooo disingenuous! Or maybe your not aware there are also laws of confidentiality to PROTECT the whistleblower?

That includes the owner, front office, and coaching staff

I too work for a Fortune 500 company, but ours is successful while apparently, yours is about to go belly up... We STRESS communication on ALL levels in so much as I know my boss job, and she knows mine enough we can fill in for each other, like this week, while I'm off... Also, if we see a problem, we immediately bring it up so it can be fixed. In government, and where you work, you accept the ineptitude and problems caused by it..

This whole hearing is a perjury trap, nothing more...

Your correct of course, my bad since I use Duckduckgo too... I guess I just assumed Gary was friendly with google but apparently not since he claims he can't find anything but I suspect just too lazy to do his own work

google is your friend

You, and apparently NBC don't pay particularly good attention do you? This was first reported about a year ago...

What do 8 years of returns have to do with a single alleged payoff to Stormy in 2016?

I know, I know... I'm an old fart that probably just deleted that memo cause I never knew I was supposed to be raysist... Could you forward it to me please?\ so I can get my act together? THANKS!!!!!

Only Democrats can invite terrorists to Camp David or the White House!

You mean like Clinton/Obama/Kerry did with our operatives in China? You're not very good at this...

Why yes they are, because they are scary looking !!!

That's okay. I set my own broken ankle, I think I manage a severed limb. Superglue and duct tape, man...all it takes... DC Tom for no more Surgery General!

I think it's also their fault my tires wear out! If the shops close, my tires will last the life of the car!

What manner of Hell is it that has other people in it?

I wrote this somewhere else.... Reference SCOTUS Case United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/ Talk about flipping things upside down, this is a SCOTUS decision on guns from 1939. Keep in mind this is during a period that FDR had even threatened to pack the courts to get them to approve his agenda (sound familiar?) to be sure to get his way on social issues. I know most won't bother reading a boring decision, so here, let me quote just one part from it: So then what are you trying to say? I'm glad you asked! The court is ruling that since a militia may be called at any time, those called were expected to bring their own arms, and to bring ones "in common use at the time" by other militias! This court literally ruled that it is those hunting guns like the shotgun in the case, that the government CAN regulate! But since people had to always be prepared for war, protection, or insurrection and tyranny, weapons of war are off limits to regulation. I know, blew me away too! Folks, I didn't write this decision I only found it while researching that Warren Burger quote that is floating around Facebook about how wrong people are about the second. This could very well be what he was referring to and would help to make even more sense of it now.. But the High Court has most certainly written an amazing precedent in this argument over so called "assault" weapons. In fact it is these very weapons the government CANNOT regulate. I've said it before and will again... Don't like something in the Constitution, change it and then I will support the change. Until then, my interest is only in preserving the second most amazing document in human history..

For the record, I fully agree with that take -- I do not know more than the actual investigators in the DOJ/FBI et al. The people in the DOJ/FBI/USIC who I speak to regularly remind me of that fact For the record, I said that it seems, and the next sentence expanded on that with: