Cinga

but.....but.... it wasn't a problem when a Democrat was in the WH!!!

raysissssssss!!!!!!!!!!!

Well yeah, cause look at the size of those.... er.... nevermind... ?

You're saying that like the POTUS could just sh1t them out! If it's that easy to gather together everything the governors need, why aren't they doing it themselves?

Wish I had that answer for you. In my own case, both parents suffered long illnesses and we took them home for the last year or so of their lives. I know with a lot of people that isn't possible but I'm a firm believer in that Honor your Father and Mother thing still holds especially later in life when they in turn need you. But regardless, we were a55 backwards in all of this, locking in healthy people who for the most part would be asymptomatic when we should have focused more on the vulnerable to keep the disease out of there altogether.

Copied from my answer to you in the stats thread: Not to sound harsh, but I would say absolutely NOT! Problem in a nursing home, and probably the main reason we have so many infected, is that most of them have a single tied together air system. So even if you only have one infected, lock them in their room, it WILL spread through the air system. Their not isolated systems like a hospital ward or even a darn hotel. We are really really screwing up in nursing homes and we don't need a Cuomo multi-million dollar study to find out how.

Not to sound harsh, but I would say absolutely NOT! Problem in a nursing home, and probably the main reason we have so many infected, is that most of them have a single tied together air system. So even if you only have one infected, lock them in their room, it WILL spread through the air system. Their not isolated systems like a hospital ward or even a darn hotel. We are really really screwing up in nursing homes and we don't need a Cuomo multi-million dollar study to find out how.

I've seen this posted before, where do these numbers come from? In a city of 8 million, stats of 80 average age would give you almost twice that a day.

Of course you haven't, but all Trump supporters have! To access these files, and become a Trump supporter, all you have to do is go here: https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donate/ Donate $100 for every year you want to see, and they will send them to you forthwith!

Don't worry, Democrats will throw more money we don't have at it to prop it up again.

right side of the page, updated in real time https://www.foxnews.com/

NY is currently at 15740 so try that again, but try it on a real calculator cause your ain't working right ?

The entire state is estimated to be 2,700,000 have had it which knocks NYS mortality rate down to .005% And you don't get to herd immunity by locking people up!

You made a funny! There is no such thing as a short clinical!

He can't, so he won't

I thought she was? ?

If true, would is sister then take over? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/20/kim-yo-jong-the-sister-of-kim-jong-un-fast-becoming-his-alter-ego

Not surprising, you lost the whole meaning of my post. Point is not other people, the point is it is dangerous for the multitude forced to wear a device they are not used to by making them touch their own face more often than they normally would.

This doesn't make a damn bit of sense! It wouldn't just be for Lynch, they had to have done something similar for virtually the entire scouting dept, coaches, and some of the office staff. Subjecting how many people to each other EVERY time? Probably would have been much safer to just let everyone into team war rooms instead like normal.

Okay, as some of you know, Maryland has been on mandatory mask in public since Saturday and I have quickly reached a conclusion. That this is WORSE than when we didn't have this rule! Now hear me out before you bash.... We know the most common way of ANY virus spreading is hand/face contact. You touch something that has the virus, then touch your face. Now in a hospital or care facilities, they have hand sanitizer stations all over, and staff uses them all the time. But in public we don't, and not everyone carries a pocket size bottle with them like I have been doing since this started. And therein lies the problem.... The public is not used to wearing a face covering of any sort. And what I see now is people constantly reaching up to readjust that mask or bandana, or whatever they have to cover their face (one of my favorite I saw was a crocheted scarf). Touching their face in the process, right after touching that card reader, or shopping cart that is not sterile and even the mask that may now be contaminated. I really think as a whole, society was doing pretty good with the don't touch your face, wash your hands a lot thing. However this just ruined all of that... Just my thoughts....

Of course you can't accept either of those hypothesis because you have been ingrained with how bad this is supposed to be. Peace, I don't want you to think I'm picking on you, it's only that you seem to present a better argument in favor of the tactics the gov has taken than most, even if I disagree, I think it's how we all learn

So are you saying we're just a bunch of dumb hillbillies who don't like authority? More on how Sweden has handled this vs pretty much everyone else: and a lot of it supports what I and others have been saying From the article: Below are a series of points made by Mr. Giesecke, via UnHeard: UK policy on lockdown and other European countries are not evidence-based The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only This will eventually lead to herd immunity as a “by-product” The initial UK response, before the “180 degree U-turn”, was better The Imperial College paper was “not very good” and he has never seen an unpublished paper have so much policy impact The paper was very much too pessimistic Any such models are a dubious basis for public policy anyway The flattening of the curve is due to the most vulnerable dying first as much as the lockdown The results will eventually be similar for all countries Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people. The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 is the region of 0.1% At least 50% of the population of both the UK and Sweden will be shown to have already had the disease when mass antibody testing becomes available

Are you really this stupid? WTF does this bulshit have to do with capitalism?

You're safe now, I found your problem....

Of course it is! While it is a Stanford University study, it doesn't fit the narrative we've all been spoon fed so it must be bogus! We should probably throw out all the other studies going on testing for antibodies too huh? Just to be fair!