Jump to content

NewEra

Community Member
  • Posts

    32,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NewEra

  1. No. This has nothing to do with the bills organization. Again, use your brain. Common sense. More safe >>> less safe. Schedule 1-3 games at a later time in order to keep players safer….. it’s common sense. 68 deaths over the last 25 years. Deaths. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2022/07/12/marion-barbers-death-what-we-know-dangers-heatstroke/10036028002/ but…..no one has complained about it before, so even thought we know it’s dangerous, we can’t change it…..because no one complained before……. Sound decision making there. I didn’t say anything of the sort. You are blinded 🧌 Sorry, I can’t help you any more. Seeking professional treatment is my recommendation to you.
  2. Oh man. That comprehension wall is bigger than ever. Player safety is player safety. My point was that they went so far as to actually change their game rules in order to maintain a higher level of player safety. If the NFL would care so much to actually go so far to change the rules for player safety, one would think that scheduling a team accordingly (during one month of the season no less) would such a minimal task and essentially a no brainer. It’s called common sense
  3. Ok…so your rationale: because no one complained about fixing an unsafe playing field before no one can. Wake up genius.
  4. He would likely go to the Ps. “Resources” lol. Minimum contract at the most
  5. Nice. Rather white over white than white over blue.
  6. I’ve seen similar hits flagged for unnecessary roughness several times. The refs gave us nothing on Sunday. We lost to injuries, the weather, the stadium, the refs, Van Roten and a couple nice defensive stands
  7. We all know that your reading comprehension is crippled due to your condition (internet trollemia). As we can all plainly see, I said that the NFL has changed several rules of their game in order to keep players safe. Here’s a list of rules (made in 2019) that have been changed in order to keep the players more safe. https://www.nfl.com/_amp/nfl-health-and-safety-related-rules-changes-since-2002 The game on Sunday was not safe. The stadium created to melt the visiting team just did that. The nfl should take action and do it’s best to prevent it’s players from playing in dangerous weather in a stadium specifically created to make it more dangerous for the visiting team. you know this…. Too bad your condition prevents you from agreeing with others.
  8. But we’ll freeze our arses off too…. That’s why this is so different. The dolphins are shaded the entire game, while the opponents are roasting. anyone and everyone that thinks this is ok, especially in todays world of player safety, is an idiot. Its mind blowing how some people just like to argue to just to argue. Not speaking about you @Gisele
  9. Regardless…. The stadium was specifically constructed to keep the opposing team in the Sun the entire game. As you say, the weather in Miami is the weather in Miami. Playing in 90 degree weather is dangerous. It’s been proven. People die. It’s unsafe. The nfl has literally changed several rules of their game in order to keep players safe. Do the math Einstein Jr.
  10. You know he’s playing
  11. First game in 6 years and you choose going to Baltimore? 😣
  12. Why would corner be a big draft need? Are you smoking crack? OL, WR, S- possibly a LB- possibly another RB late
  13. What did McDs coaching and prep for the known heat risks consist of?
  14. If I missed the context, apologies. explain the context of the bolded
  15. If you’ve been watching Singletary play, then you would know making 1 guy miss is something he does very well. You’re looking at this in a vacuum where ONLY this one play matters…. Which doesn’t take an Einstein to realize that’s the stupidest rationale one could make. One play in which you highlighted = he can’t make 1 guy miss. Wake up If you can’t connect on a wide open 3 yard out route then you’re not a quality NFL QB.
  16. To create an uprising on TSW. You fell for it Have you seen Collins or Tartt play last year?? That’s why. Neither could cover you.
  17. I’m all for it depending on the cost
  18. I agree. But I do think elam has a chance to win the starting job if he significantly outplays Dane this week (if Dane plays). I could see whoever wins the job being subbed out for the other 1-2 drives per game.
  19. Did Tremaine single handedly lose the game for us?
  20. I think that’s extremely playful considering the context. What he said should have been much worse.
  21. I find your post to be great. Thanks for posting. I find his post to be great too. Adds some spice to the thread. Makes the thread more diverse
  22. I KNEW the jets GM didn’t add enough depth to the OL! If he would’ve listened to me, they’d be undefeated
×
×
  • Create New...