Koko78

Don't be so hard on Creepy Joe. He did have upwards of 1,100 people watch his last 'round table' discussion/rally. That proves that people are interested in what he has to say. He is going to do far better than Trump with his paltry 10,000,000+ online audience.

So @Penfield45... has there been any actual proof that these guys were in the KKK yet?

Notice how the coward reaching past the protesters to punch the officers in the second video quickly ran away when they broke through the crowd?

I feel like there's a joke here...

Well that's not a very woke comparison chart; I was told that men can menstruate.

But, the Democrats would have made it double-illegal! Therefore Trump is a racist!

I would hope that the woman's pistol was unloaded, the way she was pointing it at people with her finger on the trigger.

What is 'right' for me is not 'right' for thee...

DR's name is Greg. Doesn't seem to be permabanned. No. Not everything is about you.

Blue lives matter?

They had been letting people go who had less than a month left on a local sentence. Not quite legal, but no one was really going to challenge it. The article is unclear about what the criteria is for releasing these people.

Under what legal authority are they going to release these people? Pre-conviction inmates requires a judge to sign a release, and post-conviction inmates cannot have their sentences interrupted (absent a resentencing by a judge.)

The problem becomes, whose science? There are partisan asshat 'scientists' on both sides who will manipulate the data to come to whatever conclusion their political masters find most expedient.

Of course Flynn doesn't matter. Biden's blatant corruption and role in staging a political coup is so 4 years ago. We've got bigger things to worry about when trying to elect a president, such as how bad the Orange Man is.

Just don't tell him that Trump was acquitted by the Senate after a trial.

Yeah... I'm not seeing the problem. It's just too damn bad that Mayor Jenny doesn't like it when it's her neighborhood being occupied.

Is there any actual evidence that these idiots were KKK groupies, other than the tweet of the self-professed #1 race baiter?

I'm sure they're just practicing for a 4th of July white supremacist rally fireworks display.

Pence seems like he'd be quick on the draw. Mnuchin wouldn't have a chance.

I would disagree. The question was about "rancor" in current politics - not about who was behind it.

https://www.thoughtco.com/the-election-of-1828-1773861

Eh, this is still tame compared to politics in the 1820's and 1830's.

We greet and treat new and old posters just fine. Useless posters, trolls, and morons get crapped on early and often - deservedly so. If you don't want to get treated like schitt in PPP, don't be a schitt poster. It's really that simple.

Yes, that's what he is doing. The problem is, he's not exaggerating them by much. Doubtful. The powers-that-be in the left wants a perpetual 'us vs. them' mentality to stir up outrage when it's politically advantageous. Do you really think that it's a coincidence that the current "BLM" riots are taking place right before a presidential election, where their candidate is a senile old fool? Do you think it's a coincidence that it's somehow being ignored that the 'systemic racism' occurs in cities that have been controlled by one party for decades? Do you think it's a coincidence that only certain black lives seem to matter? Are you certain that world is one that no one wants - perpetual racial conflict stirred up every 4 years for political gain? Look at the reparation discussion during the Democrat primaries, for example. Every single candidate was for reparations... or were they? Notice how every single one would 'look into' the issue, or set up a commission to "study" the issue. Not one candidate actually came out and said that they would actually give reparations. Why? Because they were trying to appease potential black voters by pretending to be in favor of it, while simultaneously not alienating those opposed to it by promising to spend trillions of dollars on it. Not one of them was actually going to take the issue seriously; it was all meaningless platitudes. If 'systemic racism' was anything more than a meaningless rallying cry, why is it that these systems are still in place? Why is it that none on the left has taken any steps in the past 50 years to either identify these 'systems', much less taking steps to remove/replace them? The answer is obvious, either a.) They don't actually exist; or b.) They exist, but are being intentionally kept in place so that outrage can be manufactured at will. Regardless, I hope you were able to get back to sleep.

She seems nice.