Koko78

Fine. Here you go:

Hmm, guess I don't qualify. I'm for fair trade, not free trade.

They now have pills to take care of your erectile dysfunction.

Eh, at least they'll have time for one last dance with Mary Jane.

That poor, poor man.

So you jam out to Vanessa Carlton in you pickup?

Celebrates terrorist bombs, ignores the brave souls at CNN who survived a non-functional fake bomb. #OrangeManBad

Time will tell, and I hope both of you are correct. I just don't see more than a few token prosecutions, with the big fish being given a pass if they go gentle into that good night.

The vocal minority won't be relevant, and their cries (were Trump to lose) will be quickly ignored and forgotten. This country has been based on a peaceful transfer of power. While this bullschiff Russia narrative from the failed Clinton smear machine has been somewhat unprecedented, the country will go on. Hell, current nonsense has been tame compared to the Andrew Jackson/J.Q. Adams fights.

The question being bad for whom? Also, are the bad actors actually going to face any serious repercussions, or will they just be quietly swept under the rug in the name of national unity?

Maybe they'll invent a collusion narrative and work with our allies to attempt a palace coup! Seriously though, Trump and his supporters will accept a loss. Ignore the bullschiff rhetoric to the contrary - that was always just nonsense from Hillary's smear machine during her failed victory lap. Yes, but did they keep good time?

Unfair? No. Not what was being discussed? Yes. To paraphrase what Harry Reid once famously said, 'well it worked, didn't it?' No one is saying Trump is a bastion of truth. The media screws itself regularly because they go over and beyond Trump's lazy and obvious lies to invent lies he never told. That's why he's winning the war. The media has worked themselves into such a dipschiff #frenzy that they've exposed their liberal bias for all to see. They've lost the trust of the moderate viewers. There's a reason CNN can't beat Nickelodeon in ratings anymore - they still pretend that they're a news organization, and no one believes they're actually reporting the news anymore.

You do realize that the NYT has published false information (and only retracted it ~7 months later)? The term 'fake news' has been well earned by the Times, the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, et. al. To say that the 'fake news' is the enemy of the people is pretty accurate. Unfortunately those 'fake news' purveyors have disingenuously spun it as Trump saying all journalists are the enemy. That is not what he said. He's been repeatedly misquoted, had his comments published devoid of context, and had the media intentionally omit details - all to trash him. He has every right to call out the asshats like Acosta. You're not a dumbass, stop being played for one.

Well, he's got a valid excuse for not arguing the point he can't argue: He doesn't have time to argue.

So you fail to produce one sound byte of the president inciting violence, but I'm the blind one? You completely mischaracterized the 'enemy of the people' comment, but I'm the blind one? I wonder, is your blatant mischaracterization intentional, or just parroting what was said about his comment (without actually looking at what he really said)? Ain't no party like an Antifa party...

Yeah, unfunny comments he made before he was President... As B-Man said: Weaksauce.

Yes, there is a difference. Trump has never advocated for violence.

Be a damn shame if someone "accidentally" tripped over the 30 yard line and went shoulder-first straight into Gronk's knee as he's blocking.

Does anyone know the status of Generalissimo Francisco Franco?

Exactly none of that is true.

Here's the full letter: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-10-25-ceg-to-doj-fbi-swetnick-and-avenatti-referral_redacted

There's an app for that:

What will that ***** think of next? Someone needs to go back and get a shitload of dimes! Oh ***** you. Beat me to it, you rotten bastard! ?

Is she capable of producing tears?

Makes sense. Lower the drug price, sell more product. It's about time that the government did something about drug companies forcing US consumers to subsidize R&D through outrageous pricing schemes, while they sold the same drugs in other countries for pure profit at a fraction of the US price.