Koko78

I'm in.

Capitalization? No. Premature punctuation, yes. Don't forget to consult your doctor if your caps lock is on for more than 4 hours...

We all know that Trump is a Russian agent; we all know that he obstructed justice;w e all know that Obamacare saved or created 248,000,000 jobs, we all know that the GOP has nothing else to do but overturn Roe v. Wade, we all know that Democrats are the smarterest people ever! Since we all know it, we clearly don't need proof.

I lost nothing, and stand by my assertion. So, dipschiff, do you understand that you are wrong about it being unconstitutional? Of course, I noticed that you backed way off your bullschiff, once again. Can't defend your point, teach? C'mon man, you said it was unconstitutional, please show the rest of us where in the constitution it says that McConnell had to hold a vote. Oh, what were you saying about us making this a "cesspool", you blithering idiot. Maybe look in the mirror once in awhile. You couldn't afford me.

Pal, doesn't mean they know their ass from a hole in the ground, dude. Still wasn't unconstitutional what McConnell did, no matter how hard you wish upon that little star.

The most experienced professor I had in law school worked at a firm in Chicago for 5 years in the about 30 years prior. Don't confuse "professor" for "practicing lawyer" (and no, adjuncts don't count).

Congratulations, you finally stumbled upon what McConnell did. Refusing to consent still wasn't unconstitutional.

The Senate's role is to 'advise and consent'. The procedure for "advise and consent" is up to the Senate to decide. The Senate was never required to consent to the nominee. The Senate was never required to hold a vote, committee meeting, or do anything other than receive the document appointing Garland, which they did. McConnell's act in invoking the 'Biden Rule' was not unconstitutional. Breaking Senate "precedent" is not an unconstitutional act, no matter how hard you cross your fingers and wish it to be. Don't whine because the Democrats were, once again, hoist by their own petard.

I am.

Yep, it's the rest of us that make this place a "cesspool".

I'd wager heavily that I've practiced more constitutional law than they have, chief.

You're a dumbass. The Senate did NOT consent to Garland being on the Supreme Court. The Senate fulfilled its constitutional duty. As for your links quoting "law professors"... as the saying goes: 'those who can, do; those who can't, teach'. Ain't that right, teach?

After AOL Instant Messenger went away, my sext life dried up... ?

Wow, that's mean. Accurate and funny, but mean.

That's why they put up "gun free" and "drug free" signs. No one disobeys signage!

Yay, let's celebrate diversity and feminism by taking everything away from people who are actually women!

Yeah, good thing you don't teach constitutional law.

Jesus, I don't think I've sent 19,000 total texts in my life.

Yeah, I love these histrionics. Every single time Roe could have been overturned (with the left flipping out about it), it wasn't. Can you honestly say Northam's comments about killing babies after birth, or Cuomo's up-to-the-moment-of-birth abortion law are a reasonable "preemptive strike" against a potential maybe reversal of an incredibly unconstitutional compromise decision? This was a stupidly-executed political overreach, pure and simple.

Not only that, but this up-to-birth abortion nonsense has pissed off a lot of people who would have otherwise supported keeping the status quo.

Yep.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/foxx-releases-smollett-files-offers-recusal-explanation-225924312.html Now the story has changed to Foxx "recusing" herself because of rumors that she was related to Smollett? Though I do like that the reporter mentioned that she continued to interfere in the case after "recusing". This Foxx B word just doesn't know when to quit.

Don't give up, it's not over! Was it over after the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? HELL NO!

This is the type of bad act that will sink the Democrats if they try to impeach Trump, especially if they think Mueller's obstruction nonsense will be the key. Millions would tune in to watch the Senate trial live, so the media can't hide it by 'forgetting' to report the trial minutiae.

'All the left had to be was not crazy...'