Koko78

Cool. what does one have to do with the other?

It would seem that he would rather we all continue to take it up the ass from China if it means his "team" wins. His "team" not being the United States of America.

Any right-wing third party candidate is going to fail miserably trying to siphon votes away from Trump. 90+% of Republicans support Trump, and combined with the independents who are sick of the Democrat lunacy, as well as the defectors from the left who will vote for Trump, he's not going to lose in 2020. It's probably going to be a win for the Democrats if they can keep Trump under 350 electoral votes. Tulsi can hurt the Democrats, especially if they try to cry about their 'popular vote' stupidity (which is why I think they're either going to promise something to buy her off, or manufacture something to destroy her.) Anyone trying to take votes from Trump on the right will quickly find themselves completely irrelevant.

Well, you see, conducting an inquiry into a Democrat who is running for office is interfering in an election. So sayeth those Democrats who are conducing an "inquiry" into the President running for office in order to interfere with the same election.

You asked...

Next discovery update in 6 years... Because Nicholas Sandmann will have to go elsewhere to get coal dust to make his blackface costume... or something.

Yes, women can have balls! Wax her balls!

I like how she cites Kerry and McCain as examples. You know, because they did so well in their respective general elections...

Don't forget that he is also backed by news articles citing selectively-leaked information in order to bolster his later testimony, because there was already news articles about the same information that was selectively-leaked beforehand! Not that I want to do anything other than mock gator, but he may, inadvertently, not be wrong. In many jurisdictions, New York included, you are convicted the moment you plead guilty. When you are subsequently sentenced (and the judgment of conviction entered) is not relevant. However, I will note one caveat: I don't really care enough to do the research to see if that is how federal law defines the actual conviction.

I'm going to call bullschiff on this. If you look closely at the transcript, completely disregard the 500+ words between "do me a favor" and "Biden", whilst simultaneously ignoring the minor detail that the Ukrainians did not feel pressured to do anything, then the transcript totally shows quid pro quo. Trump is guilty! Eh, in fairness, this isn't the exact same play. They did learn from the Russia hoax that if they hold public hearings on nonsense that they already know is nonsense, they end up looking like buffoons. Holding secret "depositions" and selectively leaking what they want people to think was the testimony consisted of is a far different strategy. Don't get me wrong, it's still going to blow up spectacularly in their faces, but it is a different strategy. I'm impressed they even managed to work in identity politics with their current star witness. He's totally unimpeachable because he's a goddamn war hero. He's completely different from all the other impeachable war heroes they've smeared the past 3 years, because he's not a Republican!

Now hold on, I've been told that:

Oh, in that case: $84,000 later, was it at least a good sandwich?

Yeah, the part about Schiff getting a veto on any GOP subpoena is quite cute. Of course, the ranking minority member can call for a full committee vote on the denial, which is a bigger joke.

That's President Swalwell, to you, peasant! Too bad he just pissed his military career away...

$57,000 later, was it even a good sandwich?

Forgot to post this yesterday...

I'll give this a try: Kamala coming off like an uncharismatic pandering moron, with a well-documented history of corruption, and no actual policy platform, is simply your white masculine privilege discriminating against her because she is a WoC. Therefore, the problem is not Kamala being a crap candidate with nothing going for her, the problem is entirely your skewed and racist perception of her, you racist misogynistic Nazi Fascist so-and-so. For further details into how this is all your fault, please read the book, "What Happened".

You have to be wrong. I'm sure there's some histrionic-filled YouTube video proclaiming that women can have balls too.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/army-officer-reported-concerns-over-trumps-ukraine-call-023300613--abc-news-topstories.html Does anyone else have a feeling of deja vu, like we're revisiting the Kavanaugh joke? How many times can they go to the well when the first "witness" for a Democrat smear fell apart, so they had to keep finding more "witnesses" hoping one of them were credible? On a side note, I love how the article contains an extensive quote from the "witness", then state that the quote is what the person may say.

Gaetz is living rent-free in the empty head of a moron.

Without looking, I can only imagine the November quote:

https://www.ebay.com/i/292931563731?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&itemid=292931563731&targetid=797643863686&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9005563&poi=&campaignid=1498384308&mkgroupid=56281260165&rlsatarget=pla-797643863686&abcId=1139466&merchantid=6296724&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8ZeA8MnA5QIVJeeGCh3jBAZCEAkYASABEgKFDfD_BwE

Please. If a cat had been involved, the last thing al-Baghdadi would have seen is the cat's brown eye, right before the kitty's murder button was activated.

Interesting article on how to pay for 'Medicare for all': https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/the-democratic-plan-for-a-42-national-sales-tax-202549219.html The author also shreds the 'tax the wealthy to pay for it' nonsense. Well, let's see what vague and stupid idea Warren comes up with to pay for her platform.