B-Man

Because it is neither. .

When the speech was over he got up shook some hands and walked away. You and Round&round are just seeing what you want. THAT is why it isn't news, even on the liberal sites. .

MORE: The reaction to Charlie Kirk’s murder in the Jewish and Israeli communities is unlike anything I have ever seen. Everyone is eulogizing Charlie — everyone. Every politician, rabbi, and just everyday citizen— everyone feels impacted. A rabbi went on Fox News and called him “the Abraham of our times.” I had no idea how important Charlie was to Jews until this morning. I do not recall seeing this level of impact by an individual on the Jewish community— ever. I wonder if Charlie even knew how important he was to these people when he was alive. Charlie’s life’s work was more important and influential than I ever realized when he was alive.

No. It is not. Because it didn't happen. Show me a video, not that laughable picture evidence. You should ashamed to have fallen for a Leftist/Roundy squirrel

And for those lefties here who keep squawking "I thought that you were for free speech" ? I will just reply; "I thought that you were against Hate Speech" ?

.

AGAIN.............................Back to the Charlie Kirk Thread.

LARRY CORREIA: You know what’s sad? I’ve seen two kinds of liberals today. The first is just stupid evil trash, dancing in the blood, and celebrating murder. They’re basically demons. Then there’s the ones who are still somewhat decent people trying to be human. Only before they can make a statement first they have to write this giant list of criteria and addendum of “Charlie Kirk said mean things and I disagree” and ***** paragraphs of ***** bull#### about how he was super bad and filled with hate, that way the other libs can know they are still pure and untainted so they don’t get eaten too, and ONLY THEN can they come out and declare assassinating people over politics is bad. (Even if they are racist sexist transphobic hate mongers who attack “marginalized communities”, and I want you vapid ***** to imagine I read that part in the most unctuous, smarmy, self righteous tone possible) None of you ***** pussies can just come out and say murder is bad. Oh no. Gotta make sure your tribe of abusive weirdos doesn’t turn on you first. You ***** cowards. I saw a bunch of these today. Sad part is these kind of people are so up their own ass in the tribal virtue signaling, and so used to these group think purity tests, that they probably don’t even think of it anymore. Placating the bullies is reflex, because you are scared you don’t want to be the next one to get eaten. Look in your heart and you know it’s true. ***** pathetic, the lot of you. https://www.facebook.com/larry.correia/posts/pfbid0aP3vy8au6zVvP1tewn1t6i5oN9D3KtVBj5A8k5aDZahGvQ3L2fNrSsT9er95RHDpl Well said.

It isn’t just America, either: From the replies: “I’m in New Zealand and it is al we spoke about today, it happened here at dawn.” I don’t know how this all sorts out, but it feels like there’s no going back to 9/9/2025.

HAVING MURDERED THE MODERATE, THEY WON’T LIKE WHAT COMES NEXT:

ERIC S RAYMOND: I don’t know anything other than public information about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. However, a primer follows about patterns in past political assassinations. I will sketch what scenarios an intelligence analyst would come up with looking at this one. The first and most important rule in this kind of investigation is: when you hear hoofbeats, think horses not zebras. In political assassinations, as an ordinary murders, the correct suspect is usually the most obvious suspect. Airport-thriller-style convoluted plots and false-flag ops pulled off by unlikely people or organizations are rare in the real world. Accordingly, when you’re trying to solve a political assassination, the right question to ask is “Who said they wanted him dead?” Then, you infiltrate those organizations, or arrest a bunch of members, and do contact tracing. Usually you do in fact find your killer that way. It’s not very different from ordinary police work except for the stakes. There are broadly speaking three different kinds of assassin: the nutter, the zealot, and the pro. They are not difficult to distinguish once you got your hands on them. https://x.com/esrtweet/status/1966130285302657124 Read the whole thing.

SLATE BOLDLY GOES WHERE NORM MACDONALD HAS GONE BEFORE:

BACK TO THE CHARLIE KIRK THREAD.

Seems over on bluesky they're taking bets over who is next with Trump, Matt Walsh and Ben Shapiro leading Joe Rogan and others

I will explain to you why the killing of Charlie Kirk pushes me to the right. He had the exact same views as my Trump supporting parents who I love. He had the exact same views as half my extended family. Just regular Boomer conservatism. And thousands of leftists celebrate him being shot in the neck. If they want that for Charlie Kirk, they want that for my parents and my other loved ones. And I won’t stand for it. Because I’m not a suicidal spiteful mutant with hatred for my own family, my own parents, my own civilization. I love the people who raised me and I’m loyal to them and I won’t ally myself with people who want to murder them just because they have old fashioned values that were completely common throughout 99% of modern history - a love of faith, family, church, nation.