Jump to content

B-Man

Community Member
  • Posts

    69,658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by B-Man

  1. Thanks for the gibberish. Meanwhile: Let’s see if I got this right. I’m supposed to vote for a candidate who: Won’t do press conferences. Won’t do interviews. Won’t answer questions. Has no policy positions on her website. Chose a pro-pedophilia governor for a running mate. Now says she stands for the EXACT OPPOSITE of everything I saw her say and do as DA, AG, SENATOR, AND VP. Treats EVERYONE like they’re beneath her. And treats me like I owe her my vote… Just because her skin color closely approximates my own? Sorry lady, my standards are way higher than that. At the very least, I’m voting for Donald Trump because he talks to me like I’m a person who deserves respect. He doesn’t say “white people vote for me because I’m white.” He says “vote for me because I’ll make your lives better.” That’s what I’m voting for. Not some LIAR who thinks she can use racism to steal an election.
  2. Legacy media is being replaced. They clearly do not like it.
  3. MUSK: “I’ve not been very political before… they try to paint me as a far right guy which is absurd because I like to make electric vehicles… I supported Obama. I stood in line for 6 hours to shake Obama’s hand… historically I was a moderate Democrat. But now I feel like we’re at a critical juncture for the country… For the people out there in the moderate camp, I think you should support Donald Trump for president.” .
  4. FLASHBACK, September, 2004: “The media, I think, wants Kerry to win and I think they’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards I’m talking about the establishment media, not Fox. They’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic and there’s going to be this glow about them, collective glow, the two of them, that’s going to be worth maybe 15 points.” https://instapundit.com/666650/ That’s what’s happening with Kamala now. But it didn’t last before.
  5. The crux of the matter is not whether Walz is a combat veteran. That is irrelevant. Most of the people who served in the military since 9/11 are not combat veterans. Along the way, the Harris-Walz campaign has walked back Walz's biography and claims. Another thing has become obvious. Whenever anyone who served with Vance is asked about his service, they are very complimentary. The former Marines who served with Vance liked him and still like him even though their politics differ; see A Tale of Two Veterans: What the Service of Walz and Vance Tells Us About the Men. His former battalion commander put to rest the "he's not a combat veteran" slur The opposite is true of Walz. His military record was examined because two of his peers blew the whistle on his self-serving cowardice. When the brigade sergeant major, Walz's superior in the Noncommissioned Officer support channel, was interviewed, CNN abruptly terminated the damning testimony https://redstate.com/streiff/2024/08/11/tim-walzs-national-guard-unit-chaplain-puts-the-retirement-controversy-to-rest-with-just-one-word-n2177987
×
×
  • Create New...