B-Man

Back to the thread: The correct answer for the "They're trying to tell us what my kids can read" crowd

I assume that you meant "Hitler" I also assume that you were typing with one hand It's fairly clear to anyone who was reading my posts that I used those qualifiers as a way of redirecting the thread back to the point and away from your long list of drivel But you fitting it to your fantasies is certainly consistent for you. .

And everyone knows it. This is the reason for the panic.

Ya think he's taking donations. . . . . . . . . . . . . and NOT altering his decisions ? Boy those 'doners' must be as stupid as you guys here. Meanwhile: He's always been a petty, small man.

Quick reminder for the board of what Moms for Liberty is truly addressing. But keep throwing those 🦫, 🦫, 🦫's out there. .

I truly doubt that Keith has more than 12 followers now.

Democrat priorities.

Wow. What better proof that those opposing Moms for Liberty have nothing. Thanks B.S. Meanwhile:

LOL, and the lemmings here feel that they are more informed.

What a blatant, obnoxious lie. One Murphy obviously thought he would get away with. .

In her written opinion on the ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett explained the message she believes Americans should take away from the decision. "In my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election. Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up," Barrett wrote. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

.

STICKING POINTS By Scott Johnson Reading about the ceasefire negotiations that the ceasefire negotiations with which the Biden administration hopes to engineer a Hamas victory requires a certain kind of immunity to savagery. Hamas seeks to trade kidnapped Israelis for terrorists who can help Hamas finish the task it undertook on October 7. The Hamas terrorists are murderers and genocidaires. The Israelis are, well, you know, Jewish. Hamas seeks ten terrorists in exchange for every kidnapped Israeli and Israel seems okay with the proposition and the ratio. However, the Israelis declined to show up in Cairo for further negotiations so long as Hamas refuses to provide a list of living kidnap victims. The Israelis assess that 31 of the kidnap victims taken by Hamas on October 7 are now dead. This is either elided in mainstream news accounts or referred to euphemistically as one of the “sticking points.” The Times of Israel summed up the status of negotiations yesterday: Israel has said that 31 of the 130 hostages held since October 7 are dead. The first phase of the mooted deal is reported to provide for the release of 40 of the living hostages, including women, children, the elderly and the sick, in the course of a six-week truce, and in exchange for some 400 Palestinian security prisoners. The outline reportedly provides for negotiations on the further phased release of the remaining hostages, living and dead, in return for longer pauses in the fighting and many more Palestinian prisoner releases. On Sunday afternoon, a Hamas official told CNN that the group will not agree to a deal without Israel consenting to an end to the war in Gaza, a non-starter for Israel. Citing “a highly placed source” in the terror group, CNN reported that the two other areas of disagreement holding up a deal are the withdrawal of IDF troops from Gaza, and Gazan civilians being allowed to return to the northern Gaza Strip. Vice President Harris found this a good time to hammer Israel yesterday in Selma, Alabama (White House transcript here). Israel is apparently responsible for “the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.” Why, “just a few days ago, we saw hungry, desperate people approach aid trucks, simply trying to secure food for their families after weeks of nearly no aid reaching Northern Gaza. And they were met with gunfire and chaos.” The savages of Hamas have their allies among the idiots, useful or otherwise, of the Biden administration. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/03/sticking-points.php https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-wont-send-team-to-cairo-after-hamas-refuses-to-offer-list-of-living-hostages/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2024/03/03/remarks-by-vice-president-harris-commemorating-the-59th-anniversary-of-bloody-sunday-selma-al/

The Supreme Court case.... is unanimous and in Trump's favor. Here's the full text. From the per curiam opinion: Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse.... All nine Members of the Court agree with that result. Our colleagues writing separately further agree with many of the reasons this opinion provides for reaching it. See post, Part I (joint opinion of SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ.); see also post, p. 1 (opinion of BARRETT, J.). So far as we can tell, they object only to our taking into account the distinctive way Section 3 works and the fact that Section 5 vests in Congress the power to enforce it. These are not the only reasons the States lack power to enforce this particular constitutional provision with respect to federal offices. But they are important ones, and it is the combination of all the reasons set forth in this opinion—not, as some of our colleagues would have it, just one particular rationale—that resolves this case. In our view, each of these reasons is necessary to provide a complete explanation for the judgment the Court unanimously reaches. ADDED: The per curiam opinion emphasizes the role of Congress in determining that Section 3 applies to someone: By Ann Althouse https://althouse.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-supreme-court-case.html