B-Man

BIDEN MAKES A GOOD POINT By john Hindraker Well, not Biden. But someone on his staff. You probably have at least read about the Biden campaign’s “bedwetting brigade” memo, but it is worth a serious look. It argues, more cogently than Joe Biden ever could, that Democratic voters are stuck with Biden and they’d better get used to it: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/07/biden-makes-a-good-point.php

"Dangerous minority of far-right voters capture a large majority of votes" LOL. The media spin is nothing if not consistent. .

If you would READ before you blindly answer. You would see that that is exactly why the court sent the case back down It is not up to you or I to decide .

THIS ISN’T SHOCKING AT ALL: Democrat Voters Are Making a Shocking Admission. What Does it Mean for the Trump Campaign? “Ordinary Democrat voters themselves are now dropping all pretense of caring about the candidate and admitting they’re voting for the machine.” https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2024/06/30/democrat-voters-are-making-a-shocking-admission-what-does-it-mean-for-the-trump-campaign-n4930279 But no, BIDEN will NOT win the popular vote anyway. .

Back to the thread: In a 6-3 ruling, the Court held that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers. Further, former presidents are also entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts. However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/07/01/breaking-supreme-court-rules-on-presidential-immunity-n2175982 The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that former President Donald Trump is immune from federal prosecution for some official acts he took while in office, in split 6-3 ruling. However, the court ruled that there is no immunity for unofficial acts. "Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion. This ruling may undermine Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution against Trump, in Washington, D.C., for his actions related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and will likely cause further delays as the lower court will now have to determine which acts alleged in his indictment constitute official or private acts before the case can move forward. You can read the ruling below: https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-07/Trump v. United States.pdf

.

Justice Thomas: "In this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a President 'is not above the law.' But, as the Court explains, the President’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law... Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices. And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law. Those questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed. We must respect the Constitution’s separation of powers in all its forms, else we risk rendering its protection of liberty a parchment guarantee."

He has, whether you turn a blind eye or not

Justice Thomas: "In this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a President 'is not above the law.' But, as the Court explains, the President’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law... Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices. And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law. Those questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed. We must respect the Constitution’s separation of powers in all its forms, else we risk rendering its protection of liberty a parchment guarantee."

I'll come back to this thread later, after the initial childish hysteria is over .

Well, he certainly doesn't understand the ruling. That much is clear.

SATIRE ??? or truth .

And there it is. . . . . . . . . . common sense

9 - 0 , I thought we had a hopelessly divided court ? Justice Kagan writes the opinion in Moody v. NetChoice. Roberts, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett join in full. Jackson joins in part and has a concurring opinion. Thomas has an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Alito has an opinion concurring in the judgment and joined by Thomas and Gorsuch.

They continue to rein in the huge bureaucratic government (sorry Roundy) The first case is Corner Post, a 6-3 decision, divided in the usual way, written by Justice Barrett. SCOTUSblog: "The court holds that a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge an agency action first comes into being when the plaintiff is injured by final agency action.

LOL

Thus Gavin will 'encourage' all the attention to him, but he won't step in now, only to lose. He will wait for 28. .

BIDEN’S DEMENTIA By Scott Johnson President Biden is obviously suffering from some form of age-related dementia. Everyone can see it. Thus everyone could see it during the debate with President Trump this past Thursday evening. The Wall Street Journal puts it less bluntly in its editorial this morning: “[Biden’s] blank stare when Donald Trump was speaking suggested a man who is struggling to recall what he has been prepped for weeks to say, but who no longer has the memory to do it.” {snip} The cover-up has begun to unravel, but it has prominent participants such as Barack Obama and Bill Clinton. The cover-up is a sickening disgrace. Chances that Biden can complete a second term if reelected must asymptotically approach zero. The over/under on his completing his current term must be something in the vicinity of 50/50. It’s time for him to go. Dan McLaughlin takes up the national security implications of Biden’s incapacity in this New York Post column. When we are allowed to see him, we can see that Biden is declining before our eyes. Thus the concerted efforts to limit Biden’s public appearances and foster the disbelief of what we see with our own eyes. Biden has entered what Shakespeare’s Jaques describes as “Last scene of all, That ends this strange eventful history” — “second childishness and mere oblivion[.]” https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/06/bidens-dementia.php