B-Man

ANOTHER MEDIA INVENTION No direct quote. No evidence. No wrongdoing. Just partisan operatives feeding rumors to desperate reporters hunting for another scandal that doesn’t exist. Under his authority as commander in chief, the president can blow up pretty much anybody on Earth whom he deems a national security threat. He does not need permission from Congress, the media, or a panel of self-appointed commentators. The missile strikes on drug-running vessels operated by a designated terrorist group are lawful, routine, and predictable. What made the episode explosive was that it enraged exactly the faction that always reacts this way: the political left. Impeachment is the only real consequence available to the administration’s critics, and after two failed efforts, that prospect does not keep President Trump awake at night. Republican control of the House makes even a symbolic attempt unlikely. The central allegation is that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth issued an order to “kill everybody” on the vessel. The Post framed it this way: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation. ‘The order was to kill everybody.’” The headline amplified the accusation: “Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all.” A “spoken directive” means no record. The quote is a paraphrase. Nothing indicates that the source actually heard the Hegseth say those words. This is an anonymous, secondhand characterization of an alleged statement — precisely the sort of raw material the Post loves to inflate into scandal. If these anonymous sources truly believed the secretary issued an illegal order, they were obligated to report it through the chain of command. Their silence speaks louder than any paraphrase. The most plausible explanation is that someone misunderstood — or deliberately distorted — an aggressive statement by Hegseth and nothing more. The United States targets terrorists. The implication behind the Post’s story is that survivors remained after the first strike and that either the secretary or JSOC ordered a second engagement to kill them. No evidence supports that claim. No one outside the direct participants knows what the surveillance picture showed or what tactical conditions existed immediately after the first blast. It is time to put a moratorium on the online laws-of-armed-conflict “experts” who materialize whenever a strike hits a target they sympathize with. They insist that the presence of wounded combatants instantly transforms a hostile platform into a protected site and that destroying the vessel itself becomes a war crime. Even the New York Times — no friend of the administration — punctured that claim: According to five U.S. officials … Mr. Hegseth’s directive did not specifically address what should happen if a first missile failed to accomplish all of those things … and his order was not a response to surveillance footage showing that at least two people on the boat survived the first blast. The mobs demanding Hegseth’s scalp will be disappointed. The voters who supported this administration expected firm action against terrorist cartels and open-ocean drug networks. Another hostile vessel was reduced to an oil slick, and most Americans see that as a success. https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/turns-out-that-hegseths-kill-them-all-line-was-another-media-invention https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/01/us/hegseth-drug-boat-strike-order-venezuela.html

The command, “Do not cast your pearls before swine,” is not about withholding truth out of arrogance or pride. Rather, it is a call for spiritual discernment. Pearls represent sacred, divine truths. Swine and dogs symbolize those who are violently or irreverently opposed to those truths. Sharing spiritual treasures with people who are intent on mocking or destroying them is not only unproductive—it may lead to harm. Jesus wants His followers to be wise. We are not to judge others hypocritically, but we are also not to foolishly give what is sacred to those who are determined to reject it. https://bibleask.org/meaning-of-do-not-cast-your-pearls-before-swine/

, Well sir, I do not feel obligated to answer your question, Because you just told me that actual (demonstrated) news was not legitimate to you. So why would I, or anyone for that matter, try and feed your 'curiosity' ??

A pro abortion book aimed at 5 to 8 year olds is for sale on Amazon It is pointed out that this is sick. Frankie's take is. . . . it's your fault for talking about it. Homelander level response.

No. It contains quotes and links to the quotes. Unless you just read opinion at the top and not the whole article ? .

Sign the Pentagon press rules, get access. Not hard.

“What did Ilhan Omar know about the $1B welfare fraud case in her Minnesota district?” Good question. Moore quotes Bill Glahn: “She had been inside the [Safari] facility on numerous occasions and couldn’t put two and two together? Either she’s terminally naive, or knew and didn’t care.” Good answer. https://nypost.com/2025/12/04/us-news/what-did-ilhan-omar-know-about-the-1b-welfare-fraud-case-in-her-minnesota-district/

EDUCATION FAILURE: Nine in ten college students think ‘words can be violence’: survey. https://www.thecollegefix.com/nine-in-ten-college-students-think-words-can-be-violence-survey/

NOT REAL SMART, ARE THEY? Democrats Humiliate Themselves AGAIN With Another Epstein Drop. House Oversight Democrats embarrassed themselves again on Wednesday with yet another stunt masquerading as transparency. They released what they hyped as never-before-seen photos and videos from Jeffrey Epstein's private island. Dems postured as noble seekers of justice in their post on X: “These new images are a disturbing look into the world of Jeffrey Epstein and his island. We are releasing these photos and videos to ensure public transparency in our investigation and to help piece together the full picture of Epstein’s horrific crimes. We won’t stop fighting until we deliver justice for the survivors,” Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said in a statement. “It’s time for President Trump to release all the files, now.” There was just one problem: The images weren't new at all. The post turned out to be the latest humiliation of Democrats in their attempts to anoint themselves as the party of transparency regarding the Epstein files. In fact, investigative journalist James O'Keefe and his O'Keefe Media Group had already made those same images public roughly seven months earlier. Even more ironic is that Democrats slapped unexplained redactions all over these previously released images. O'Keefe pointed out that his organization had released the same photos in May without any redactions, yet Democrats were "now redacting Epstein photos" for reasons they didn't bother to explain. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/04/democrats-humiliate-themselves-again-with-another-epstein-drop-n4946693 Honestly, I think they haven’t caught on that the legacy media can’t protect them any longer.

Is it weird that the first thing I thought was; They have the same hats

No. You should either read what they wrote and comment, without blindly dismissing it or you have no business complaining. You know, how adults act Back to the thread: But you must be racists, we said so........😢

People who don't read much don't know who is an authority on what, they just strike out at those who challenge their biased narrative. It shows ignorance and cowardice.

REMINDER:

Kent State a cappella group bans white students from solo auditions. https://www.campusreform.org/article/exclusive-kent-state-cappella-group-bans-white-students-solo-auditions/29047

But they have their old fallback. . . . . . . . denial. "Minnesota Governor Tim Walz was warned about massive fraud in a pandemic food-aid program for children, yet he failed to act." "Instead, whistleblowers who raised concerns faced retaliation. Because of Governor Walz’s negligence, criminals — including Somali terrorists — stole nearly $1 billion from the program while children suffered.” Said House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), quoted in " Treasury, House panel launch probes into Tim Walz’s handling of $1B food aid fraud — and they could make criminal referrals" (NY Post). https://nypost.com/2025/12/01/us-news/treasury-house-panel-launch-probes-into-tim-walzs-handling-of-1b-food-aid-fraud/

.

.

.