B-Man

No adult falls for that dodge. You on the other hand.

Posted earlier. Lost in the gibberish. Connor Grubb trial: Judge dismisses charges connected to death of Ta’Kiya Young’s unborn child COLUMBUS, Ohio — A judge on Tuesday dismissed four charges against Blendon Township police officer Connor Grubb, who was accused of murder in the deaths of Ta'Kiya Young and her unborn child. Young was fatally shot by Grubb inside a vehicle in the Kroger parking lot on Sunbury Road on Aug. 24, 2023. Judge David Young announced in court that two counts of murder and two counts of felonious assault will be dropped against Grubb. According to the indictment, those charges were related to the death of Young’s unborn child. https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/judge-dismisses-charges-connected-to-death-of-takiya-young-unborn-child/530-80edeabb-4785-4d22-bc57-b69a622e944b

https://x.com/Cjpearson/status/1990840938076283217 Democrat members of Congress-- including Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly-- just released a video encouraging members of the military to defy orders from President Trump. The party of "NO KINGS" is now encouraging a military coup. "Yes, it is a federal crime in the United States to attempt to induce members of the U.S. armed forces to disobey lawful orders. The relevant laws are found in two main places: 18 U.S.C. § 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally (part of the broader “seditious conspiracy” and interference statutes, originally from the Espionage Act era and updated over time): Subsection (a) makes it a crime to knowingly: advise, counsel, urge, or cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States, or distribute any written or printed material that does so. Penalty: Fine + up to 20 years in prison. Article 94 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 894) – Mutiny or sedition:Specifically criminalizes any person subject to the UCMJ who, with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, attempts to create revolt, violence, or disturbance, or who solicits or advises another service member to commit mutiny or sedition. But civilians can also be prosecuted for aiding or encouraging this under federal civilian law (18 U.S.C. § 2387 or § 2388). Key court interpretations and historical applications: The statute has been upheld as constitutional when applied to speech that is directed to producing imminent lawless action and likely to produce it (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969 standard applies to First Amendment challenges)." https://x.com/Cjpearson/status/1990840938076283217

From Tiberius ?? I tell you what leh-nerd. Why don't you ask tibsy why the victim in the Charlottesville car attack didn't just "get out of the way." .

You shouldn’t hate a country. Just those who are evil.

Orders that they will decide are illegal LOL. Desperation is not a strong enough word for the left’s posts tonight

They ARE allies of the United States I could post recent photos of Obama and Biden with the Saudis, but you seem to blind to see them.

Desperate Democrats Demand Disloyalty !! Dumb Donkey disinterested

Well I see that the judge in the case has already dismissed the killing of the child. Connor Grubb Trial: Judge dismisses counts related to the death of unborn child https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/

Me too.

Uh, you know that they are our allies, right ? .

Your 2nd grade responses ?

This Is a Win? There are many times we have to wonder if politicians truly ever hear themselves, particularly the ones on the left, who've never met a government-funded program they didn't try to make larger. For that matter, they've never met a program of any sort that they don't try to turn into a gigantic government-funded program. We all know what happens with these programs. Millions, billions, or more are spent, and results are never delivered. Just look at high-speed rail in California, which Gavin Newsom is STILL trying to push. But maybe, as The Washington Post told us during the Biden disaster, we just need to lower our expectations. Take this wonderful success in Minnesota that Senator Amy Klobuchar bragged about last night. Thanks to her government funding to the tune of $60 million, the state was able to complete a whopping 15-mile section of highway. And look at how quickly it happened: https://x.com/amyklobuchar/status/1990575363689242982? Nope, that's not a typo. FIFTY years. And Klobuchar is calling that a win. Everyone on X called it something else entirely. https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2025/11/18/amy-klobuchar-touts-highway-project-that-took-fifty-years-to-complete-n2421814 ...is this conservative parody of government efficiency??

UNDERREPORTED STORIES: Has Mexico Had Enough? “This isn’t the first protest against cartel violence, but it may be the first to reach the center of government.” https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=68775

BUMP

Same old misrepresentation.

Thomas Massie's Latest Epstein Files Claim Is Too Cute by Half FTA: MASSIE: Some people have said, ‘Well, how will you know that he’s released the files?’ We will know when rich and powerful men are implicated. So they’ve claimed that they’ve been releasing thousands, tens of thousands of documents to Congress already. But what we’ve discovered is there’s not a single new name in those documents. We know because we have survivors through their lawyers who’ve told us that they have names. We know, they know who’s in those files, and we’ll know if he’s given us a complete release. Let me stop him right there because that's not how this works. The absence of evidence is not evidence in and of itself, and it's a logical fallacy to assert that unless the files tell him what he wants to hear, that must indicate there are more files. If there's not a "single new name," it is perfectly possible that's because there are no more names. Suspicions of a broader conspiracy, and I've had my own over the years surrounding this case, are not sufficient in this context. As to the claim that there are survivors who have "told us that they have names," that is hopelessly ambiguous. What if the names are just the names we already know? Regardless, at some point, and that point was a while ago, if they aren't willing to release the names and make their accusations public, then there's nothing else to be done here. I realize the response will be that they signed NDAs, but NDAs can not legally be used to cover up criminal activity, and in such a situation, can be broken to report the crime to the police. This entire thing has turned into a game of circular logic, where a lack of evidence is treated as evidence, and the best sources (the victims) aren't expected to actually be sources. Why would I care what Epstein's emails say if almost all the women he trafficked are alive and able to testify? If rich and powerful people committed sex crimes in conjunction with Epstein, then they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Turning this purely into a political issue, absconding from any attempt at legal justice against these suggested other perpetrators, is just a bit too convenient for me. I think Massie knows that, but he's so deep in his own sauce that he can't be objective anymore. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2025/11/18/thomas-massies-latest-epstein-files-claim-is-too-cute-by-half-n2196309

Just posting information. You can ignore if you wish. .

I don't know about the "biggest" story, but it is damn important.

.

There’s not a shred of evidence linking Trump to the pedophilic activities of the late New York financier, but Democrats will use whatever they can to make the case. Yet, with the media’s credibility in shambles and the Democrats in total chaos, Trump and his team likely and rightly think they can easily slap down any narrative that comes their way. They should feel confident—Democrats have nothing. Yet, why didn’t Joe Biden, who weaponized the Justice Department against Trump, release the files? He could have. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) was asked that, and his answer was not good: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/11/18/chuck-schumer-was-asked-why-didnt-biden-release-the-epstein-fileshis-answer-was-brutal-n2666581

Back to the thread subject. The Cost of Speaking Truth in Women's Sports By Brad Essex When Alexa Anderson and Reese Eckard stepped off the podium at Oregon's girls' state track championship in May, they weren't staging a tantrum. They were taking a stand. Third and fourth place in the high jump after years of grueling practice, the two Tigard High School seniors refused to share the moment with a transgender athlete who had cleared the bar for fifth. In that quiet act of dissent, they exposed the raw fault lines in the push to redefine fairness in women's sports. Anderson, now a freshman at the University of South Alabama, earned her bronze medal the hard way. Four seasons of early mornings, sore muscles, and quiet determination led her to that podium. Yet officials, after forcing the protesters out of the championship photo, promised to ship the medals to the school. They didn't. Not for months. Only after Anderson and Eckard sued the Oregon School Activities Association, alleging a First Amendment violation, did the medals arrive, quietly forwarded to their lawyers at the America First Policy Institute. U.S. District Judge Youlee Yim You's recent denial of the OSAA's motion to dismiss underscores the case's merit. The association had argued against claims of selective censorship, pointing to allowed displays of Black Lives Matter slogans and pride flags at events. Anderson has seen it firsthand: Shirts, pins, and banners celebrating those causes drew no ire during her high school career. Step off a podium to question biological advantages in a girls' event, though, and suddenly free expression becomes a problem. This isn't about one medal or one meet. It's about the slow erosion of Title IX's promise, that bedrock law meant to level the playing field for women. Transgender inclusion policies may sound compassionate on paper, but they collide with reality on the track. Female athletes, already outmuscled by biology, now face competitors who retain male-developed advantages in strength and speed. Anderson's protest wasn't malicious, but for voicing it, she paid dearly: death threats that read like "I hope you die," demands for her expulsion, even barbs claiming her parents must be ashamed. https://redstate.com/brad-essex/2025/11/18/the-essex-files-the-cost-of-speaking-truth-in-womens-sports-n2196266

Reality Caught Up to ‘Climate Change’ American Greatness, by Victor Davis Hanson For decades, the monolithic and sacrosanct international climate change hierarchy went unquestioned. Western nations in particular spent trillions of dollars over the past half-century to subsidize expensive but erratic wind and solar energy while demonizing carbon fuels as toxic threats to the planet. Like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion dogma, climate change orthodoxy was embedded into every aspect of Western culture, from the corporate boardroom to the university campus. Question whether man-made global warming was truly responsible for increased temperatures rather than natural, often centuries-long cycles of heating and cooling of the planet, and one was labeled a climate crank. Everything from declining fertility to forest fires was ridiculously attributed to climate change. But the causes of both demographic crises and charred landscapes were more likely the result of new affluent lifestyles that saw child-rearing as too expensive and time-consuming, and misguided forest policies or underfunded firefighting. Yet reality has caught up with the near-religious climate change cult. More at: https://amgreatness.com/2025/11/17/reality-caught-up-to-climate-change/