Realist

I think its hilarious that everyone heard/read the same thing and came away with different conclusions. I guess that was some great coach speak by Gailey then, to get us all wondering what he really said. Personally, I think if he's blown away by Cam's football IQ in the interview, he goes with him. Otherwise, he's happy with Fitz for now and goes defense with #3, taking a QB later, possibly Kaepernick.

Per Peter King Tweet, from conversation he had with Newton this afternoon: @SI_PeterKing Peter King Newton: "I see myself not only as a football player, but an entertainer and icon.'' Ron Rivera, Chan Gailey, John Harbaugh blanch. For anyone that hated TO, it looks like Newton may be of the same ilk.

As much as I want to go defense first in this draft, it's starting to look more and more like Newton.

Why do you think it has to be one or the other? So if they change their uniforms, they can't work on changing their record? We've been complaining about those abominations since they released them, of course we're excited about the change.

Obviously winning is the most important thing, but why not win and have good uniforms? Its not like an either/or thing. It's not "we either put out a good football team or we get better looking uniforms". Why couldn't we be excited about both? I don't know one person that liked those unis when they came out in '02, so this is a good change.

This was a very telling quote and one I always believed: "Ralph Wilson is a very smart guy, and if he thinks he has an estate tax problem or is going to have an estate tax problem, I would have to assume he's already done something about it. Now, I know he plays his cards very close to the vest, but I don't ever know if the Buffalo Bills are going to be for sale." I never understood why so many people think that Wilson has nothing planned. I know he hasn't told the public about it, but does he have to? I mean, I have something planned and I don't have anywhere even a smidgen close to what Wilson has.

If you love hockey, you have to go to the game at least once. The game was great, there was no defense but you could tell the guys were out there just to have fun. I was at the skills competition Saturday and to tell you the truth, I found it pretty boring. Had a great time at the game though. Seeing a lot of former players was great, ran into Mike Bossy, Jeremy Roenick. Other than the few idiot 'canes fans that still are pissed about the Conference finals and had to say a few things, most everyone were friendly and cool to talk some hockey to.

All I know, is Buffalo needs to stop the coaching carousel. I don't know if Chan is the answer but he needs to stick around here for at least the next 4 to 5 years whether we like him or not.

Now I don't have to watch football next year. Thanks for letting me know the Bills will suck.

Sums up my thoughts on the subject perfectly.

RIP

What he said! This whole thing stinks like ****! But of course its something bad about the Bills, so everyone on here believes its true.

They're starting to make the Bills look good.

If we grab a QB at #3, I want him to sit behind Fitz for a year or two. Now if we get a DL or LB, he should be starting.

Have you read nothing about this guy lately? I didn't see anything that he was a good leader from his Tennessee teammates.

As I said yesterday, he has absolutely ZERO leadership qualities. I don't want him anywhere near this team.

No one ever questioned Vick's leadership abilities, with Young its a different story. VY has all the talent in the world, but absolutely no leadership qualities.

Although Arizona needs a QB bad, I don't see them trading to #1 to pick up Newton. They'll get a qb at 5 and probably even Newton there.

+1

If this was the case, he never would have signed already. He could have waited for the season to actually end and other teams start sniffing around for free agents.

Last year fans didn't want the 4-3 here, this year they don't want the 3-4. Is there a DC out there that teaches the 6-5 or the 2-9?

Vince Young is the Anti-Fitz in the huddle. Sorry, he may have all the talent in the world, but I would not want him near this team.

+1

Why? Because Edwards was Chan's pick for the DC position and he is not going to give up on him after one year (no matter how crappy the D was this year). If you give up on him after one year, what does that say to the new guy if his new scheme doesn't work next year? Also, your players are forever in a state of learning a new scheme and will never fully grasp it if they are changing DC's year in and year out. Are there better options out there? Without a doubt, however those other options will have a high cost and Wilson will not pay a DC as much or more than he is paying his head coach. We're stuck with Edwards for at least one more year, if there is no improvement next year (not sure how there can't be), then I would expect a change.

As much as I would like to see a new DC in town, I doubt it happens. Gailey will stick with his man for at least one more year. Also, I doubt Wilson would pay what it takes to get one of those DC's in here. They would commond about as much as Gailey is getting. Face it, we're stuck with Edwards through 2011 if not longer.