The Jokeman

Thank you, people keep wanting to cut Murphy yet we're paying him relatively half what a guy like JJ Watt gets, people act like the $7 million is starters money. He's getting paid for what he does, to toss that aside is foolish unless paying someone less that's as productive which we don't have. Kroft and Smith both could be gone if we think Sweeney is the future and we can find a better starter (I'd love to sign Henry). I can't see Croom making this team as think Sweeney has more upside. A starting caliber CB be nice to add but that's a luxury until we shore up a replacement for LoRax, Shaq, Jordan Phillips and depth at LB. A guy like Devin Funchess could give us size and while he may not be a true #1 he'd still be better than all but Brown on the roster. Toss in he could be cheap coming off an injury. I'd risk it and draft a guy in the first three rounds to compete (I like Michael Pittman Jr in the 2nd).

What about Donnie Henderson?

Right so if he replaces Shaq (which he does in my mind) a little less playing time should mean a slightly reduced number of sacks.

Yeah Jim Jeffcoat played a rotational role here when he was 34-36. Addison might not reach 10 but think 5-8 sacks are a realistic goal.

I think Addison is a great add for a two year option while we develop guys to replace him and Hughes behind them. I especially like that Addison has a history with McDermott/our new DL coach and toss in well thoughts of Brandon Beane.

The Bills have shown to be a rotational system, so all this talk about cutting Murphy is foolish as likely going to pay his replacement the same or more and then find yet another DE to replace Shaq. I can't see any way the Titans let Henry go with what he's done down the stretch.

Robert Saleh.

I'm not sure we could beat KC, that offense is just deadly that said I do agree with a few improvements the Bills should be back in the top 3-6 teams in the AFC again next season.

I'd be happy with 5-8 sacks, granted I also want to see us add Mario Addison who think should be able to the same in terms of sacks in order to replace Shaq Lawson. As think he could be more affordable and we'd only need him for a year or two assuming we also draft someone to develop behind him and Hughes.

He'd be a solid add my only concern is he's a 3-4 OLB that be asked to move to a 4-3, similar to what Jeff Posey had to do and while he was good he never had same sack numbers here than he did in Houston.

Hopefully he is an ex factor as he wasn't anything special on returns and contributing little as a WR. I'd replace him with a kid that can return and provide depth in the secondary and/or at WR.

I'd love to add someone like Ashtyn Davis in the draft for S depth/return specialist in the draft that way can part ways from Andre Roberts.

Clowney is a good player yet not sure he's going to be worth the money he seeking/is due. Personally I'd rather sign a guy like Mario Addison for a year or two and draft a kid to develop behind him and Hughes.

Matthew Judon but sadly it looks like Baltimore is going to franchise him. I'd also give Mario Addison a hard look, his age a little concerning, yet can't deny his production the last 6 seasons. Yet Hunter Henry be my top guy to go after if he's available.

I'm not watching but did any announce that common sense says DeAndre Carter didn't want to fumble the kickoff?

Williams started 12 games at LG last year

Then have to wonder if they name Scott Pioli as GM?

why? I could see going after Mario Addison though as he give us a pass rusher that might be cheaper/better than Shaq for a year or two. As Addison likes to think Beane made his career and now we have a guy he's been coached by most of his career too.

The Sophie's choice of polls, sorry I can't vote either.

He was still involved in the passing game, I mean he did make that great catch and run on 3rd and 9 before the downs that lead to the Cody Ford penalty call.

Totes or totally or totally awesome etc. It just feels uneducated using those phrases. I also think the term thot is uncalled for and the word kumquat has always bothered me too.

Because he was thought to be one of best WRs in college, excelled in the CFL and now trying make his way in the NFL.

People can change https://www.sportsnet.ca/football/nfl/former-cfl-player-duke-williams-making-second-nfl-opportunity/

According to https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/duke-williams/ he compares more to Laquon Treadwell

He likely won't be there but if look back the last few years WR been taken later than sooner. So one of the better WRs might fall to us that said I'm in favor of adding an Edge rusher and been campaigning for Curtis Weaver recently.