Jump to content

JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS

  1. ESPN did not project DS to be a top-quality RB. Therefore, there has to be some made-up BS reason why he is not a top-quality RB.
  2. IKR but Tom looks like he's going to a snowball fight.
  3. Is it for some reason like 23 degrees in Tampa today? Cant see the Ugg boots but I can only assume ... while everyone else is in flippy flops.
  4. non sequitur: watching this I realized we really DO have the best uniforms in the League.
  5. our color rush works great in blizzards and we should reserve the right to wear them at home in January.
  6. You realize the GMs and coaches are the ones drafting and building around QBs right? If the QBs consistently suck, there is only one place to look ... So its the GMs and coaches after all. And they have to both be good at the same time, and they have to share the same vision of the team. We didn't have all three of those conditions present for two decades. Now we do.
  7. imagine if it were possible to have Diggs AND draft a WR. wait ... it is
  8. whichever one BB picks.
  9. why would you have to tank to take a GOAT QB in the 6th round?
  10. I honestly think Washington Groots is an improvement over Redskins.
  11. Maybe the Diggs rumors came from the same place as Allen's ill-advised tweets? I see a pattern ...
  12. we don't know he wont make the roster. He will get evaluated like everyone else in preseason.
  13. your logic is sound, but I don't think Cam (or his agent) would accept a backup job anywhere.
  14. do NOT let him leave the building!
  15. that's what I was thinking. Dude is projecting.
  16. I respectfully disagree. We comfortably won our way into the playoffs on that schedule. We could have won more games but McDermott played conservatively, knowing we had 10+ wins in the bag. Example: second Patriots game. We could have won that game, but NE just wanted the win more. I even think we would have taken more risks and possibly won earlier games if we had a tougher schedule ahead, example Cleveland game. We won the games we had to win, which mostly weren't that hard, and the rest we were willing to let ride rather than take a big risk on Allen getting hurt again or making an embarrassing mistake. The Baltimore game is another example of a game we lost because the other side just seemed to want it more. My first point being: we didn't need the creampuff schedule last year to make the playoffs. My second point now: that creampuff schedule HURT us in the playoffs. Playing tough teams all year is great training for the playoffs. Playing easy teams is negative training for the playoffs. I think we were honestly surprised how hard that first game was, after mostly easy games all year. I hope this year's schedule is more challenging, as we need the hard play and we need to have some HUNGER going in to the playoffs. We need to get used to taking risks to win games because we wont win the playoffs with a conservative game plan. With all due respect to Marv, we have to take a page from BB and learn to approach each and every game as a "must win", and a tougher schedule will force us to do that.
  17. so they went with "color rush" for every game?
  18. Turns out his 1989 Ford Taurus is worth a fortune
  19. Allen can throw scary long passes. Diggs can catch inaccurate passes, in coverage. if Diggs and Allen have chemistry, you are going to see a fusillade of deep balls caught every game.
×
×
  • Create New...