26CornerBlitz

He's behind a legit NFL starting QB, so I'm sure he can live with that unlike backing up a QB who's not NFL worthy and a green as grass rookie.

Re-trade? He's on a 1 year deal and will be a UFA next season unless he's retained by the Saints. At any rate, New Orleans has no incentive to deal him.

Derek Anderson could very well perform better than Allen in the short term, so hold on thar bobba boy!

Zu spät!

Perfect week to trade for Luck with him being done. They can start Brissett. Get 'er done Mr. Beane.

Debrief: Reasons to be optimistic about every single NFL team Buffalo Bills: Buffalo's defense has held three of its last four opponents under 300 yards, with defensive end Jerry Hughes, defensive tackle Kyle Williams and breakout linebacker Matt Milano all playing well. LeSean McCoy's return to form gives the Bills a path to stay competitive if they can get anything out of their quarterbacks. Big if.

He just had a workout with the NYJ today. We'll see whether he signs.

Vic Carucci said in the WGRZ video that McCarron wanted out after learning he'd start the season as a Bills' backup as I suspected.

In 2004 Big Ben was complemented by a good OL, a strong running game, and good WR corps none of which exists with the 2018 Buffalo Bills. Beyond that Ben did not have as much of a learning curve as Allen coming out of Miami of Ohio.

Good video discussing the question of who to start at QB on Sunday.

The Rams make it official.

From Joe B's Week Six All-22 Review: 2) The Bills Cannot Start Nathan Peterman- I know this isn't going to be a controversial opinion with fans, because the vast majority likely will agree. However, after reviewing the 24 plays Peterman was in the game on the coaches film, I don't know how you can justify giving him another chance as the starting quarterback. You have to give credit where it's due, and for Peterman, he deserves it for not only his touchdown pass to Zay Jones but on a third-and-long throw over the middle of the field to Andre Holmes. However, past those two throws, Peterman exhibited the traits of being a liability on the field and a player that is quite simple to game plan against for opposing teams. The book is out on Peterman. He struggles, on a consistent basis, to drive the ball to the boundary. The location on those throws is usually behind the target and Peterman mostly stares down his target on those plays. With such a weakness in this area, it allows the defense to bait Peterman into those throws -- as we've seen in almost every game that Peterman has played in the regular season. Without those throws, a struggling offense has one less thing that it can depend on to gain yards. These are necessary throws, non-negotiable even, and it puts the team at a complete disadvantage to have a quarterback that hasn't shown he can do it, and that isn't confident in that area, either. The quarterback situation is less than ideal for the Bills, but I don't see any reason to believe that starting Peterman over Derek Anderson, even though Anderson has been with the Bills for all of one week, would be better for the team. This decision isn't one that they wanted to make, but it's an easy one nonetheless. Reduce the offensive playbook and play it safe with Anderson and the running game, and bide your time until Allen is ready to get back on the field.

Darn good question to which I have no answer.

Who Should Start for Buffalo in Place of Injured Allen? (1:39) John Fox and Tim Hasselbeck agree that Derek Anderson should get the start at quarterback in place of the injured Josh Allen.

Bills vs. Colts Vegas Lines Bills +7.5