26CornerBlitz

Belichick and McDaniels wouldn't have either but the Patricia led Lions punched the Patriots in the mouth and beat their ***** 26-10 earlier in the season.

Bills Today: Bruce Arians - Josh Allen's Game is Growing

4th and and inch should be a run on a QB sneak. The 4th and 2 play wasn't a run until there was nothing in the passing game with the play breaking down. The 4th and 2 wasn't much in the end as there was plenty of game left to be played.

You have mostly heard that here on TSW as a backlash by the Allen bunker brigade. Rosen still has elite pocket skills and passing skills, but the situation around him as deteriorated as the Cardinals season has gone along. Allen has improved, but so have the receivers around him with Foster blossoming and McKenzie making plays with the departue of Pryor and Benjamin.

Jackson is a different paradigm as a QB as a true dual threat. Darnold shows quite a bit in terms of passing traits and playmaking on a bad team, Rosen showed well earlier, but things have declined as his situation has gotten progressively worse with a terrible OL and weapons getting injured. Allen's situation has gotten better with the speed element added by Foster and McKenzie along with his own development. Long way to go for all of them.

I already watched that and in fact posted it in the Allen progress thread yesterday. Like I already said, the signs are encouraging.

He said it was film study and I'll take his word for it. In then end analsyst opinions don't matter.

Foster as the Bills' most dangerous receiver will draw Gilmore I believe. Belichick and his D just faced Antonio and JuJu last week, so I think they'll be ready.

You know Belichick will do everything to take Foster away and make Allen seek out other targets. Zay Jones better bring it this week.

You're making general statements about what you sense that don't translate to anything of substance regarding long term QB success at theNFL level except you maybe to you. The signs for Allen are encouraging, but he's no sure thing.

He has shown some really good signs of late, but has a lot of developing to do. Confident? Based on what?

Of course you do. If his opinon were the same as yours he'd be brilliant and you haven't put the work in to assess his view witout bias. Look him up for yourself.

You must have missed the game winning TD pass to Foster that was the biggest spot of them all.

His is an informed opinion based on the work he does with a long term projection. Cherry picking a negative stat that you have no idea of the circumstances of is a bad way to project long term success or failure with no context. Just admit you don't like his opinion and again what does it really mean. In the end, nothing.

Of course you have watched all of these QBs on film and have no bias.

On a BIlls' forum I'm sure it is. In the end who cares, it's just an opinion that will have zero impact on what happens in the long term.

You're not absorbing the full meaning of his opinion that isn't a snapshot of today that you seem to be stuck on. "Rookie QBs' long-term outlooks ranked based on how the QBs have looked on film so far"

Based on what? Your dislike of his opinion? Do as much film study as he does and get back.

YouTube version posted.

Gruden talks Peterman in his presser from earlier today.