Cynical

Least funny? Where does one start. Larry the Cable Guy Dane Cook (Both as a comedian and actor) Mitch Hedberg

Whoever edited that video needs to be taken out back, and tasered, beaten and shot.

So you would be fine with no collegiate sports?

What system?

On the D-1 collegiate level, that would be pretty much every sport except for football and basketball, and there are plenty of D-1 colleges whose football programs are "useless". From the D-2 level down, that would be every sport, including football and basketball.

What exactly is a "useless sport"?

Wife just told me they reported the southbound overpass suffered structural damage. (northbound collapsed). It will remained closed. Ouch. Glad I don't have to travel into the perimeter area anymore.

For those that live or commute through the Buckhead/NE Atlanta area A portion of the I-85 over pass collapsed. http://www.cbs46.com/story/35036795/major-fire-breaks-out-on-i-85-in-atlanta

So, for selecting players who aren't likely to work out, the Bills should use a criteria of how much media attention the signing creates? Dog kicking comes after cat skinning and child beating.

I never said you were NOT concerned about the product on the field, I said your were MORE concerned about media attention. Your own statement seems to reflect that stance: By your own admission, Manziel isn't likely to work out. So why do you want him? Media attention! Hell, if media attention is what you want, why don't you lobby for the Bills to replace Frazier and Dennison with Rob Ryan and Art Briles. That will generate some media attention. Then they can put Johnny in the back field with another FA pick up named Ray Rice. Oh, and work out a trade for Pac-Man Jones. Think of all the media attention!! But wait. To insure Cincy will trade Pac-Man to the Bills, the Bills should offer their entire draft picks for this year AND next year! The Bills will suck for the "foreseeable" future, but the media attention! 24/7, on every sports channel and web site. You would be down that, wouldn't you? Thought so.

This is pathetic. More concerned about the attention from the media, than the product on the field.

Well, he is consistent. Both are ****ty QBs, with highly questionable leadership abilities. He probably wants the Bills to draft Chad Kelly.

And after that TD, he did nothing with the rest of his "career".

His word is worthless. He's not sober. No need to sign.

Becasue he says so? Let somebody else find out. Said it back in 2014. Evans made Johnny.

Wheres his NFL highlights? Oh, thats right. Nevermind.

That is just wishful thinking. The committee did 6 weeks of ranking. Until the last ranking, USC never broke the top ten. So what? You think that should be a deciding factor whether or not a team makes the final cut?

And OSU beat Oregon by 22 points in the first CFP Championship game. The horrors. The inhumanity. Blow outs happen. Its a part of the game.

I agree the sample size is not big enough. That includes using any aspect of it to justify expanding the playoffs. (ie The semi final games suck. We need to expand the playoffs) The BCS wasn't perfect. I don't need a college playoff to prove it. Games like ND vs Alabama proved it. Disagree. 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 is not parity. Heck, the 2 vs 3 semi final game for the past 3 years has been laughable. And the problem with expanding the number of teams, in order to get "USC", you will have to take on more "Okie State". By the way, here are the final top 8 teams ranked by the CFP committee, prior to the 2016 bowl games, in order: Alabama Clemson Ohio State Washington Penn State Michigan Oklahoma Wisconsin Jesus. Instead of one overrated Big 10 team, there would have been 4 of them. Notice whats not on that list: USC http://collegefootballplayoff.com/content/ranking/2016

Other than the 4th seed, yes it validates BCS. The whole point of the BCS (and the bowl alliance before it) was to pit the consensus 1 vs the consensus 2, and let those 2 teams decide the NC so there was no dispute who was #1 when it was all said and done. Looking back at the past 3 years of the playoffs, the #1 and #2 seeds for the playoffs were: 2014 - Alabama at 1, Oregon at 2 2015 - Clemson at 1, Alabama at 2 2016 - Alabama at 1, Clemson at 2 Of those 6 teams, 5 made the NC. If they had stuck with pairing 1 vs 2, the outcomes would have been nearly identical.

No, it would just add more posers into the mix. Under the old BCS format, the BCS picked the 2 teams that played for the NC. But people bitched and whine because the selection process was flawed and wasn't fair. So college football added 2 more teams and called it the "playoffs". 3 years later, and all the playoffs have proven so far is BCS was right in their selection more times than not.

Off the field on a personal level, he's a douche bag. On the field on a professional level, he gets caught up in his "genius".

If the selection process is "flawed", then fix the selection process. Adding more teams to the present process will not fix anything. It will just ensure even more blowouts in the playoffs.

A Mighty Taco closing is a strike? More like a PLUS!

Feel free to name all of these "better teams"