Bleeding Bills Blue

Didn't mind it on the last TD drive because they were just rolling that drive with Murray in No-huddle. Don't let them get set a certain way, let murray get you two and call another play.

Agree here - even if the 3x1 gives you an iso with kincaid... teams often just play the pass. Our run game hasn't been working out of that formation for weeks now.

For all the love stroud gets... he did lose the H2H matchup 2 weeks ago to carolina and had like 120 yards passing.

Looking through teh game log.... KC blew this game with turnovers. 1 -MVS fumble kills promising drive - denver scores from the drive start at midfield. 2 - Interception gives Denver ball in KC territory - defense stops them on 4th down. 3 - Red zone fumble by Mahomes - takes points off the board. Now its 21-9 - they left points on the board in the red zone earlier and kicked on 4th and 2. 4 - Muffed punt - Denver was punting from the KC 36 yard line. KC scores after keeping the ball at the 10. Then it was failed 4th down in Denver territory. 6:30 to go down 12. 5 - Mahomes follows 2 sacks with an INT that all but called the game. I'm sure denver did some nice things to mix them up - but KC ran the ball 9 times in this game with their running backs. 44 pass plays including scrambles. 5 turnovers.

Could have been a miscommunication too - looks like harty heads inside (where there is space) and allen threw it vertical right around the same time. But either way, the result is the same, the pass was uncatchable.

gonna cost them 92 million dollars for... whatever he put up this season. Maybe he'll start for them next year, but i suspect they'll go QB in the first. He IS tyrod taylor... He's athletic, all of his big plays come out of the pocket. The second things break down he usually looks to run. He doesn't throw with much touch, and he isn't a tight window guy. He's not even that athletic tbh - if my QB's best attribute is his running he should run like a 4.4.

Wrong shoulder though... if you're running a post and you throw it over my head to the other side its impossible to change directions, get there, as well as track the ball in the air.

Say what you want about the read... but thats a bad throw. He's open there (NFL open anyway), and you didn't even get it to a spot where he can make a play on it.

Bengals sit in cover 2 all game... Occaisionally rushing 3... And we have good YAC guys giving up snaps to davis so that davis can run clear outs for diggs/kincaid. Our tight end runs nothing but out routes. It works until it doesn't. We always look for hole shots in cover 2 - despite having a TE who can stretch those linebackers up the seam and ya know... create space for YAC underneath.

He's solid depth and special teams. He can play inside and outside, has hands, and is fast. Basically a kumerow replacement. They were subbing out diggs and putting him in on run plays early in the year because he's a solid blocker too. Obviously that tips your hand a bit though. Harty was a mckenzie replacement. He's a better punt returner than mckenzie, but he isn't really a slot WR. I do think he's a tad more elusive than mckenzie, has better hands, and is actually a solid ball tracker on deep balls. Not sure why he isn't in the red zone package more - he's probably one of 2 players on the team that you can throw short of the end zone and have a reasonable expectation that they break the tackle and score. Because they're using kincaid as a WR at times, and shakir is finally getting some run in the slot - neither is seeing snaps at the moment. You can easily take some snaps from gabe and give them to either for something different. You can also move diggs into the slot and take a few shakir snaps and do something. I mean... what we're doing isn't working. Why aren't we trying to find other avenunes to get players involved? If you are going to throw short constantly you need YAC players - harty has wiggle, sherfield has speed.. isn't that what you want?

Literally just did this against TB and then this game he's just running clear outs. I don't love gabe the player, but man do we set this guy up to not get targeted sometimes. I agree on balance... at times. Weather is about to get pretty lousy soon, and you need to be able to run the ball in those games. Right now i have 0 faith in our ability to do that. We don't have run plays we use a lot that work, it seems like we're constantly in the mud lately.

Yeah... the Harty thing is weird. He's got running back quickness, hands, etc. and we can't put him on the field for 10-20 plays and pull gabe off? Or pull shakir off and throw diggs in the slot? I know they like gabe as a inline blocker in some formations, but if you jet motion harty across the formation it functions the exact same way as blocking. He's also like... the exact opposite of davis - short and quick, while davis is taller and takes a second to get going out of his breaks. Like... don't we want to stress the defense? Sherfield has top end speed on those deep crossers... shouldn't we use that speed to our advantage?

Honestly with the timeout there why not just call it at 1 and kick? Probably miss but like... we just let the clock run out? What was that? Challenge was bad... there just wasn't enough value in it even though he probably caught it.

No team has scored 30 points on the bills this season. Buffalo is 5-1 if they hold the opponent to 20 or less (included the jets here), and 0-3 if the opponent scores 21 or more. The Bills have been held under 21 points 4 times this year. To act like there isn't an issue with the offense is not accurate.

Steelers might be able to get to 10 wins - theres some softies in there. They play their division tough. But 5 road games, and no passing game is probably going to be tough for them to go 5-4 rest of the way. Jets also have no passing game. That tends to rear its head more and more as the year goes on. Causing you to lose games you should probably win. Browns have a run game, and they have a defense. Probably my 2nd WC pick after the bengals. Same time though they turn the ball over more than buffalo. Their defense reminds me a bit of some of the Bills #1 defenses that just destroyed a few teams and had amazing stats. They shouldn't be a shoo-in. Houston has a soft schedule, only play 3 outdoor games rest of the year. But they also just lost to carolina last week so I'm not likely to annoint them anytime soon. Buffalo needs to win their home slate the rest of the way - Denver, NYJ, Dallas, NE. That would put them at 9 wins. Of the remaining games 1 win against Philly, KC, LAC, and Miami gets them to 10. I hate looking at a schedule and saying the Cliche thing of we can beat any of those teams, but its not wrong. They can go toe to toe with anyone for the most part and keep it close. I think the bigger issue with this team and how they are playing, is they absolutely can lose any of those 4 home games. 1 win on the road this year, and the only home loss was in London. My guess? 10-7. Denver, NYJ, NE, LAC, Miami as the W's.

Stroud also had 119 net passing yards in a loss to the previously winless carolina panthers. On the plus side for Houston, they only play outdoors 3 times the rest of the regular season, are in the same 1PM window on sunday for almost every game, and have Arizona, Indianapolis, Denver, and Tennx2 on the schedule.

Its a silent count. Almost every road team does this. Some teams hit the centers thigh or whatever, but that is the trigger that we're good to snap.

2 week span they lose 3 starters for the year. Take out Reader, Pratt, and Taylor-Britt from Cincy yesterday - it's going to take some time for a team to adjust to the new group of guys. I agree, they weren't getting home and they were picking them up. At the same time... 4 man rush wasn't doing enough either. At some point the coaching doesn't matter when the guys on the field aren't getting it done, and there aren't even guys on the bench you can put in.

When the team has 1 or fewer turnovers - they are 4-1. When they have 2 or more, 1-3. There were some end game theatric fumbles by diggs and allen in these games, but the 5 straight weeks with an INT have been back breakers. When they win the turnover battle, 3-0. When they lose 2-4. Step 1 - Stop turning the ball over so damn much. 4-0 at home, 1-4 on the road (i counted the london game as a road game cuz... it is). There's still a real HF advantage in buffalo and all 4 of those should be considered very winnable. If i had to guess why we were having more success in no-huddle against cincinnati, a big piece of it is the complications we make for our offense. Away game, personnel changes and playcalls take longer, you line up later, you need to set line protections, you need to motion people, and you have to use a silent snap count which is a big tilt to the defense. Step 2 - Figure out how to speed up the pace on the road. Even if just for some stretches - if you get to 2nd and 1 just rush to the line and force them to react to it. If we spend 30 seconds changing in for some jumbo package we basically tilted our hand. Offense has looked bad on the road all year long. What in the world is going on with our running game. The last couple of weeks we have been getting killed with negative runs. When the team including allen rushes for 100 total yards - not even a really big amount - 5-0. When they are under 100 yards rushing as a team. 0-4. Step 3 - Create a run game that has an actual identity.

Maybe not 25, but easily 20. Dolphins, Ravens, Jags, Chiefs, Eagles, Cowboys, Lions, 49ers. Who from the list below do you want over the current bills offense? Jets Patriots Steelers Browns Texans Colts Titans Raiders Chargers Broncos Commanders Giants Vikings Packers Bears Saints Falcons Bucs Panthers Rams Cardinals Seahawks

Miller is here through next year. There won't be a trade partner, and it'd cost you cap space to release him. Knox probably is too. I don't know the rules on his roster bonus - if that travels with a trade, maybe you could get a team to be interested him. Acquiring team basically gets him at 1yr 9.9M and can probably spread that over 2 years? I still don't know if there's a big market there. Tre - its tough to say - there is 6.3M in cap savings. Assuming you have Benford, Douglas, Elam - Jackson is a UFA. Knee and Achilles now, its tough to want to do much more of a commitment. Hines is on there for 5.5 so he's gone for sure. Harty saves you about 4M. Since we don't use him at all i can't imagine why we pick that up. Neal saves you 3M. Morse saves you 8.5M. Poyer would save about 5.5M. I doubt they go this route unless he becomes a pain again. Hyde is a UFA. Gilliam saves about 2. Seems like a lot but then you realize that a UDFA gets like 800K and you realize how little it does. Extending douglas even a year would lower his cap hit. You can also release him for 0 dead money. Considering what we gave up to get him i put this at 0% chance if he's healthy. Content to let poyers contract play out.

His base salary this year is 1.5 so they definitely kicked the can. It is not a 4 year deal at minimum. The out is still there in 2025 - you just only get 8.4M in cap savings to cut him. You can't cut him next year as his base salary is fully guaranteed. You can't trade him because 17.1M is a lot for a pass rusher that hasn't flashed since 2022 pre-injury.

The lulls get sort of amplified when the defense struggles to get off the field.

Love the optimism! Not even being sarcastic. This place gets so doom & gloom at times. Everyone has the answers and its fire everyone and focus on the draft or something. Going into this week I never felt particularly good about this game. Their defensive line is a bad matchup for our offense, and I knew we would struggle to run the ball and with pressure up the middle. So my opinion on a loss shouldn't change, even if the way they lost wasn't good. Defense mash unit didn't get the job done either. They made quite a few plays, but they just followed them with mistakes. 2-0 on turnovers, and some ref fairy dust sprinkled on top and boom - you lose. The team knows what is in front of them now and that mindset needs to change from "not wanting to make mistakes", to "doing what it takes to win".

They just have no interior push to create problems for the quick release. We tried pressure packages up the middle to force errant throws and even they couldn't get home. LBs being total 0's in coverage and tackling meant they would carve us up in zone.