-
Posts
10,414 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Bleeding Bills Blue
-
Bills claim DT Jordan Phillips
Bleeding Bills Blue replied to JoeF's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'd be interested in britt or mitchell. They both have some experience in a erhardt perkins system. Assuming theyre healthy... -
That is a rather big mistake... Even if you leave yourself 10 seconds or something its still better. Tennessee had 2 timeouts as well. Why not make them use them? I probably wouldn't have opted for the squib kick either. Christies limited leg may have forced their hand though. Maybe have a high and short kick plan or something along those lines. It's that type of situational football that you need to think about. More food for thought... The clock starts as soon as the kickoff begins (in 1999), so if you had limited it to maybe 8-10 seconds, you can kick it out of bounds and leave them with only like 4 seconds from their 40. A FG is impossible
-
So we're going to pay a guy 100 million because he eats space? He was paid to be a top 3 playmaking DT in the NFL. To rush the passer, and to be a player you had to gameplan around. He was not any of those things. Good Riddance. They paid him 5 mil last year, and a little over 10 this year. Those are reasonable numbers for a space eating NT/DT. We traded him so that we could get half his dead money on the books for 2017 and eliminate his fully guaranteed 2018 base salary. Saves Pegula some 15 million in cash.
-
Yeah - thriving to the tune of sub 200 yards passing, and 2 TDs and 3 picks through week 3. That teams been all defense. Less than a hundred on the ground every week, tons of sacks, takeaways, and even 2 defensive TDs. I assume Beane was there and they indicated a few things. 1 - we're rebuilding and a lot of this season will be based on evaluating players 2 - we have a massive dead cap number, and probably the worst roster in the league 3 - all of that dead money is money that was already paid to players, so we probably have the cheapest roster in the league 4 - we will likely turn a higher profit than the previous year due to paying out less in player salaries and signing bonuses 5 - we have a lot of draft picks, and a lot of cap space to make moves to address holes in 2019
-
This would be some sound logic TBH. If Mahomes had played at the senior bowl i think there would have been a better chance of us selecting him. The extended looks in practice, and the game film in more pro style offenses etc was important for McDermotts evaluation - based on the fact that we drafted 4 guys who played in the senior bowl (3 on offense). It's a tall task for McD to scout everyone himself based on the fact that he was coaching all season the previous year. I imagine he watched a ton of film, but at the end of the day it's clear he wanted to get guys he met and liked.
-
McCoy is done, Trade him
Bleeding Bills Blue replied to QB Bills's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
No - he's walking in 2019. You cannot extend him mid-season. If you want him - sign him in FA next year. Why trade future players to try and fix a bad team? -
Will we ever have an offense
Bleeding Bills Blue replied to Stroke 17's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Get ahead of sticks - less likely to have penalties running than pass blocking - less likely to get turnovers - set up PA... Seems smart especially with a rookie QB. -
Will we ever have an offense
Bleeding Bills Blue replied to Stroke 17's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Are we a running team? We're the 24th ranking rushing team. -
They took a look at the receivers on the roster... And tried to upgrade them. He had raw abilities that we needed, especially speed. He was acquired for basically nothing meaning cutting him was never off the table. We can't complain about how bad the receivers are and not acknowledge them trying to get some talent in there. Not keeping him shows to me that he doesn't get it, and with all his talent he can't put it together.
-
It's different and unconventional. It's just an idea. Otherwise they go down the same road of either slowly beginning to rebuild their roster in year 1, or fully gutting their roster on year 2 or 3 of a QB contract. He seems like... a good not great QB. Somewhere around that dalton/flacco/tannehill level. They all have moments where they look great, and moments where they look inconsistent.
-
The idea is that the team will be dismantled if you extend him anyway. 5th year option buys you a year. Then he gets his extension and it becomes a major problem to keep players. The late round guy would be brought in say - this years draft in the 3rd. Then when goff hits 5th year option, you can look to move him if you are comfortable with the 3rd rd replacement for at least a year (he's had time in the offense, etc). And can use the picks you get to replenish depth, and possibly draft the next goff. It is not conventional - but the article shows how teams with expensive QBs aren't doing particularly hot anyway - Ravens, Bengals, Raiders, 49ers, Colts, Lions, Chargers - etc. You keep the strong defense together, you keep your top level playmakers, and you build in the trenches. It also becomes a QB desirable location from a FA perspective if you need a player for a year.