sherpa

Another "absolute nonsense" claim. The US president has remarkable and almost totally discretionary authority by law and precedent responding to anti US military actions, and that extends to preemptive actions to prevent them. I can name scores of strikes that support that claim. Biden is viewed as a clown, and unfortunately, he's going to have to use his powers to prove otherwise. Suggesting this is a Congressional failure is ludicrous.

Very big deal. Might be an interesting week.

Count me in.

Absolute horsecrap. Absolute, complete horsecrap. Take the cost of border enforcement. Add to it the cost associated with housing illegals and their healthcare, add to it the cost of deportation, which is all done by the wonderful US taxpayer, and present any reasonable argument that illegals are a net positive. The claim is preposterous.

Any claim that illegal immigration is a net revenue positive for US taxpayer is pure lunacy. Absolute lunacy. https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/shocking-cost-the-illegal-immigration-crisis-americans

We have laws to stop it. This administration chooses to not enforce those restraints for political reasons. Same as the goofy strategy of buying votes by promising to strap the US taxpayer with student loan obligations. Pure nonsense from a failed administration.

Oh. I wonder what race? Ten years of South/Central America trips watching this industry. Ya. Must be racist.

I'm not sure what you are inferring, but the US taxpayer cannot support this level of illegal immigration. Simply economically impossible.

And who came here legally? Welcoming should not be suicide. That's why we have laws.

We're both on the same page. I am merely pointing out that US influence is much less than it used to be. The first thing we need to do is lock the border to illegal immigration. Unless that happens, and we develop a spine, nothing else matters.

That would be great, and I fully agree, but we are much further away from attaining change than we were decades ago. The US' reputation in South/Central America has declined over the years. Trump didn't help and polling revealed that. Biden certainly hasn't moved the ball forward. I spent ten months a year going down there from 2003 until 2015. Had a business partner in Paraguay who is still one of my best friends. Had the opportunity to witness the entire Chavez political nonsense up close. The systemic problems are immense. Corruption is an intractable, accepted way of life. There is profound class structure and sexism. Anyway, it's a problem that the US does not, currently, have the ability to influence. The first step is to lock the border to any non legal immigration. Once these failed govs are unable to dispose of those they don't want, they will have to deal with the very significant problems they are not addressing. Each country is different, but the ruling political entities are all powerful.

Not true. The US has been very effective in thwarting missile attacks. What we should do is demolish these non-state attacks against commercial, non combatant commerce. It would take less than a day, if the administration had the nuts to do it. Otherwise, we have what we have, which is a task force under constant alert, responding to a threat we could end in a wink. Make sense to the Biden group here? Not to me.

Jesus. The claim that the US Navy "lost a battle at sea" is idiotic.

First, Israel did not invade the Gaza. I was responding to a claim suggested by someone else. Perhaps you didn't, or couldn't read it, so I'll post it again: "What if this is about natural gas in Gaza? Would your opinion of Israel and our government change if there’s gas in Gaza? " I have no idea why you couldn't figure this out, but my claim that it is a preposterous theory stands. Hamas did this, and actions cause reactions. Maybe you can get this without a Trump/Putin reference. By the way, still waiting for anything that supports your revisionist claim. Total, unsupported nonsense.

Look at how the media has framed the New Hampshire thing. Trump suggested she claimed victory. Absolute nonsense, unless you disregard her acknowledgement of his win and her congratulations directed to him. He made the ridiculous claim and they ran with it. Perhaps they are deeply concerned with how Haley demolishes Joe in current polling.

You post the most stupid crap, If you are inferring that Israel "invaded" Gaza as a desire to obtain a potential energy source, that is lunacy. If not, I don't get what you are suggesting. Nobody on planet earth is desirous of the potential fuel resources in the Gaza strip. Hamas broke a ceasefire. Hamas has had 16 years of rule to advance those people's lives. All they have done is take all their resources and build an underground war bunker designed to eliminate Israel. Neither Putin nor Trump has anything to do with this, but like a drug addict, you simply cannot resist.

Got it. I'm not there yet, but all signs affirm your view. My hope is that a more reasonable, less martyr mission candidate causes Congress to shift in ways Trump's presence has been woefully horrible in the past two elections. While I detest this "lawfare," it is what it is.

I don't get what you are claiming here. She would have little or no effect on candidates in Senate and House races. What she does is not piss off 50% of domestics and a host of foreign nations who are quite sick of this crap. We need a change. We need some kind of leadership that unites. It sure as hell isn't this infirm we have in office, and I don't think it is Trump.

We have zero need for natural gas.

Don't agree. I don't care who funds her campaign, as long as she keeps challenging Trump. Nikki Haley gets conservative Congressional seats. Trump does not. She is smart, accomplished and not a lightning rod for more chaos. She would demolish Trump in debate, and would bring in a host of new, bright supporters to a gov that has been dysfunctional for years.

Your superior intelligence? OK

You are clearly crazy. When have I ever gotten upset at anything anybody said about Putin? Did you imagine this? Reading what you post presents a dilemma. There is so much nonsense that the conversation can never lead to anything beyond responding to your nonsense. You have authored one idiotic post after another this PM, so I will never get to your question about what I think is a wise Congressional strategy regarding Ukraine aid, which there is no doubt that I support, and have here, repeatedly.

You are truly a goof. I never "whined" about helping Ukraine. That is the purest of pure BS. I supported it, and even provided a link to an extremely informed youtube that explained the value of it, which I undeniably support. I doubt you noticed that, because you're not good at noticing stuff. The rest of this is pure manure. Your demands that people label things, Putin as a terrorist/war criminal, which I have, and dropping cluster bombs as a war crime are not going to be responded to by me. I don't work for you. You don't interest me.

Are you really as goofy as you appear? I'll ask for the third time. What is the basis for your "revisionist" claim? It can't be that hard for you to answer. Answer that, and I'll respond, eagerly, to you latest query.

What does your new question have to do with the allegation of revisionist history? What are you suggesting? Answer that and I'll be glad to answer your latest query.