Jump to content

sherpa

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,836 profile views

sherpa's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (6/8)

4.2k

Reputation

  1. You really don't get the point, as you never do. Immigration status does not change one's humanity, and I never claimed that, and I fully support, and have, those that are in need, Breaking laws is not a Biblical principal, and not endorsed. Further, I could not care less about Papal comment. Interesting, but to me, a person who left the Catholic Church over the Papacy and other non Scriptural issues that they proclaim, I have no interest in his directives, as do so many of the proclaimed Catholics who reject other doctrinal issues. See Biden and Pelosi. Supporting those in need does not mean supporting illegal activity. Nothing Biblical about that. Get them help and get them out, and allow them to solve their domestic problems, as we did in 1776.
  2. Ya. I can defend it Biblically, but it wouldn't matter to you because you're a politically corrupted idiot. The Bible, and Christian doctrine does not support illegal activity. What it does support is taking care of people. I have no problem with that, and Christian organizations do this billions of times per day. What is not supported, again, is breaking the law and asking others to support that illegal activity. Clothe them, feed them if in need, but don't support illegal activity and claim the Bible supports it. That is nonsense, just as disregarding the gross dismissal of Catholic doctrine for purely political reasons, then waiving some Papal crap and claiming it is governing.
  3. There is no "scandal," and the Pope does not represent or speak for, or govern Christians. To use your phrase, "tell me more" about Catholics like Biden and Pelosi who have no interest in Catholic doctrine if if doesn't suit their vote getting desires, yet claim to be of that faith. You are an idiot.
  4. Avowed Catholics Joe Biden and Naci Pelosi couldn't care less about the Pontiff's and Catholic doctrine regarding abortion, so who knows?
  5. Graduated from there in '81. My squadron mate and best bud, Kurt Watson, wanted to fly for the Blue Angels. He got picked up by the team and was the one who flew Tom Cruise when Cruise was deciding whether or not to do the movie. All documented here: https://avgeekery.com/how-the-blue-angels-convinced-tom-cruise-to-do-top-gun/
  6. US Navy Officer 1976-1984 Active Duty. Five years in Reserves Naval Aviator Two cruises on USS Kitty Hawk. 300+ carrier landings Then Pacific Fleet Adversary Instructor proving air combat maneuvering instruction and support to US Navy, Air Force and a few other countries.
  7. I'm not trying to influence your opinion on anything, and certainly not the gov. I posted my view on privatizing the ATC function, ie.. getting it away from the gov. Safe air transportation is statistically proven beyond doubt. That safety comes from internal checks and balances from each company and their employees. Anything can be stopped at any time to ensure standards. I know this firsthand, having served as a guy who qualifies captains and first officers on domestic and international routes. The gov monitors, but has nowhere near the talent or skills that people employed in the industry do. I have carried many of these guys in the jumpseat, supposedly doing line checks, mostly on international flights. I never had any one of them that was anywhere near the competence of the employees of the airline. They were a nuisance distraction. The US airline industry has an amazing safety record. The gov is not the reason for that, as is grossly evident in the Washington midair. Completely an FAA debacle.
  8. When someone has anything definitive that asserts a counterfeit, non TSO part, I'll be the first to respond. All of this maintenance and parts replacements are logged and the FAA has full time people assigned to monitor it at the site, as well as pilot training and other standards. As of now, it's just uninformed people yacking.
  9. This seems to be taking a vector that is not informed. Aviation parts are subjected to what is called "technical standards order." That means that all parts used have to meet standards that are FAA governed. They can't be simply purchased from Amazon. They have to be TSO compliant, or cannot be used.
  10. Some thoughts. Regarding age, see B-52. Introduced 70 years ago. Airplane parts are not simply purchased without having to meet standards, no matter the supplier. It appears the uncontrolled damage from the no. 1 engine impacted the no.2 engine, resulting in insufficient thrust to remain airborne. Aircraft wing mounted engines are designed to separate from the aircraft before causing damage to the wing/flight controls. It shouldn'tbe too hard to figure out why the no. 1 engine separated. Regarding insurance, I'm not sure how UPS handles this, but most US airlines, since 9-11, are self insured. Flying boxes is way more profitable than flying people, and cargo aircraft are a lot less expensive.
  11. Living here, I don't think your view is accurate. There wasn't one time in the cycle where she had a chance. He endorsed her and provided add content for her. His legacy is just fine and I expect we will hear from him again. I for one, would be delighted if he re-emerged on the national scene. Smart. Talented. Great speaker, Natural, genuine enthusiasm. Not a career pol with debts to entrenched forces.
  12. I want to have reliable, responsible, efficient air traffic control. I don't, and I firmly believe that service being removed from our federal gov and the massive costs associated would be far better if handled by the private sector. I have absolutely no doubt about that claim.
  13. Younkin has had an extremely successful term. He would have easily been re-elected if Virginia law allowed. He has no responsibility to try to salvage a completely lethargic campaign by the state Rep Party.
×
×
  • Create New...