Jump to content

Thurmal34

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thurmal34

  1. This team sucks against the run.
  2. They should be arrogant. Why wouldn't they be?
  3. IMO "not remotely ready" sez he didn't see all of Buffalo's games. That said, Manuel has a TON to prove and IMprove on in 2014. How hard is he going to work in the os? Is he going to go the early career Brady route and earn the parking spot awarded to the player that puts in the most work in the offseason? Is he going to shore up the accuracy issues that plagued him in his rookie year? Is he going to grab the team by the balls and lead it? Crap, is he going to stay on the field enough in 2014 to answer those questions? We'll see.
  4. They must have stayed at the Holiday Inn on Delaware!
  5. What kind of career?
  6. It's lemon squeezy man, he refuted his own points.
  7. Look dude, you made a claim that was proven to be incorrect. Just move on. You are embarrassing yourself with all this rationalization.
  8. Dude you posted the same stuff over and over for months about the Bills' FO being incapable of fooling anyone vis a vis the draft. Glass houses, man.
  9. I'm more excited to see what he can do in 2014 if he can stay on the field. The dude has talent when healthy.
  10. I've heard him mention a few times now after a win him hoping to "get on a roll" and "winning a few in row". I get it, but i wish he wouldn't talk in those terms, and I'm afraid he's communicating that to the team. Getting on a roll comes from taking it one week/game/half/quarter/drive/play at a time and chunking out the work. I'm hoping he's not losing focus on the small stuff that invariably takes care of the big stuff.
  11. This could be an Epsteinesque circa 2003 (Billy Mueller, Cabin Mirror, Big Papi) type move. Hopefully the player can stay healthy.
  12. He's not a guard. Success will sell out the stadium! Er, ah, maybe not. You just disproved your own point.
  13. I think its about 55%-45% for me. He has shown some solid stuff, but also some tentative stuff. This latest injury is not helping.
  14. The trouble with your comment is you don't have any proof. There was a football organization to be proud of on 1/3/1993 and the the place was not sold out. There was a football organization to be proud of on 1/15/1994 and the place wasn't sold out. Excuse. Nothing more, nothing less.
  15. Settle this with a spearing contest!
  16. Interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing!
  17. Perhaps. However, in order for the coaching staff to have screwed up, we have to assume that each WR competing for that one spot during TC gave the exact same effort while on the clock, mastered each detail identically, and put in the exact same amount of work study while off the clock. If that wasn't the case, and the evidence we have -while admittedly circumstantial -stongly suggests that it wasn't, then how can cutting Rogers be on the staff? This is a textbook case of a guy not doing enough to make the club if there ever was one.
  18. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/factoid?s=t
  19. In order for any of that to have happened, he would have had to have made the team. He failed to do so. The staff didn't blow this one, Rogers did.
  20. Incorrect. This must be one of those "rare occasions".
  21. TC isn't the time to be "handling" players. It's incumbent upon the player to do everything in his power during that time to catch the coaching staff's eye and essentially force them to keep him on the roster. Clearly, Rogers did not do that. Thus, he was released.
×
×
  • Create New...