Thurmal34

Sorry, should have made my OP more clear. What is the long term plan to improve this group? Not expecting miracles in 2017

Thin at starter, thin at backup. E Wood expires when, at the end of this year? Incognito old, Cordy's health an unknown. What is the plan for improving this group?

Don't forget Justin Armour.

But the head to neck ratio...

Mike Glennon's head to neck ratio is like 1:1

He'll be in radio in 2017.

There are so many (or one) men who assured all of us since we are such simps that McCoy would be on radio by now. I hate (or love) to point out when my fellow opinionators are wrong but chances are it's best to not say anything and have ppl assume you are an idiot than to boldly proclaim something, be wrong AGAIN, and remove all doubt.

It's either take a QB every draft or it isn't. Take a freaking position one time.

Ralph's biplane is due for repairs?

Many times a power screwdriver can resolve the issue.

If this is true then Whaley /job If not then Vic is also /no accountability Whoops! Seems you are defending Whaley, since you cite 31 other FOs that made the same choice as DW inyourexample

Hammer mentioned this a while back, that his truck was almost always gone by 5:30-6:00. Not too impressive.

Jeckyll and Hyde team.

It's amazing how close the Buffalo Bills came to beating the Seahawks in their building.

Those guys = Kenneth Davis to Shady's Thurman. Solid to elite backups/change of pace guys. The very reason they have been so effective is the juxtaposition against the stars. No team has ever given Kenny Davis, Mike Gillislee, or Fat Karl 235-250 carries. Who is smarter, the GMs that could have done that or you?

Agreed. 1/4 has never been a majority, or dare I say, a ton. Guess it all depends on agenda.

With the exact same personnel? If not, then your argument is disingenuous at best and specious at worst. Or is this the Todd Bowles thread 2.0? Can we, for once, attach some perspective to our posts? Stop this madness.

There is a specific crowd (individual) in the D Carr thread that thinks the Bills should take a QB in R1 year after year. Since we all know that is baboonery, taking a CJ in R4 in 2015 does not inhibit a team in any way from taking another QB in 2016 in ANY round.

Our local team is a poor man's carbon copy of Seattle. Against other teams that know how to beat Seattle, our guys lose. However, I see Seattle not knowing what to do against a cheap copy of themselves and our guys having a chance. Bills 29- 20

Post of the decade?

Reading thru the D Carr thread, it seems the idea of drafting a R1 QB every year has come up again. While popular in theory, how does this strategy play out in practice? In year one, you take a R1 QB. Assuming you have a JAG you want to replace, and a QB3 that is just that, this new QB becomes QB2. In the (likely) event that he does not win the job, you draft another QB in year 2 and release either JAG or QB 3. You've now paid out R1 rookie deals to both players. How does camp go? Who leads? Who gets reps? If they both are young QBs that need seasoning, what do you do then? Draft another QB year 3 in R1? If so, and the QB you drafted in R1 begins to develop, what do you do? You now have 3 guys you paid R1 deals to in consecutive years at the same position, two of whom will not play for 5 years but can't be cut. Discuss.

Yep, and the Bills still ended up exactly tied with NE this year.

Our guys beat them without their best. Their guys beat our guys without our best. All told? 41-41.

Grow up. You are embarrassing your mother and me. Seriously dude, grow up. Newton is correct.

Gabriel's Gate are always well done and not too saucy. Perfect crisp. Plus the beef on weck there is out of bounds.