Jump to content

Thurmal34

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thurmal34

  1. If your country was under attack at it’s very core, base, and foundation, would you care more about the cool foriegners you knew or reality? If another land attacks your fundamental institutions and you blame a political party are you still capable of decision making?
  2. I don’t care if I spelled it right or not. Iran had a democratically elected leader post WW2. Moghadesh. They elected him. Their populace. Their choice. Not BP’s though, and he was about to nationalize the Iranian-Anglo company (now BP). Couldn’t have that, so Kermit Roosevelt organized dissent in the streets in favor of the Shah That planned out well, no?
  3. Hopefully by the time the $1.5 trillion bill comes due for this 2017 tax cut a few thing will be in place; a president who gets economics 101, a willing populace to buy it, a chick with big breasts to promote it.
  4. Wonder if King’s protests would be considered “liberal” now or just. One thing we can all agree on. Our government considered this peaceful protester, this doctor, this leader, an enemy. One cannot argue otherwise, as the leader of the federal cops told this “liberal protester” to kill himself on multiple occasions. Most are more committed to order than justice.
  5. Gonna try to move this thread off of “whataboutism” and back to the thread title...who can share the real Trump presidency vs the media’s portrayal of it?
  6. If true this is an outrage of the highest order. An abomination. A kerfuffle. A conundrum. How could any any competent staff see Peterman as anything other than Frank Reich at best, Gale Gilbert at worst? If more, tar and feather them all immediately. Furthermore, send them all over the falls in a tar coated flaming ship with huge Ls on the side. Nathan freaking Peterman? Really?
  7. I can remember being stunned after the game in my Dad's TV room. Since then he sold a house, bought another one, sold that one, bought another one. In that same period I have gone for 28 to 44 and all of the subsequent things that go along with that.
  8. This **** has nothing to do with politics. He committed a crime. Buh bye.
  9. Whatever happens, we deserve it. No one had the balls to say no. When fascism comes to America, it will be cloaked in the flag and holding a cross. A private special forces and espionage network loyal only to the leader. America.
  10. Don't worry everyone, we have investigated ourselves, and we found out we did nothing wrong!
  11. In order to subscribe to the theory that either the D or for that matter the O “quit”, one must first believe that said unit was quality. Right? In order to perform at a lower than expected level to establish “quitting”, one must believe that the “quitting” team is high quality and deliberately performing at a lower level than their expected capability for no other reason than spite for their coach. Therefore, it can only stand that a quitting team must inherently be of high quality and has made a conscious desision to not play up to the known standard of high quality that has been previously established. Is that what you or anyone else subscribing to this “quit” theory believes? If so, what evidence can you provide?
  12. I was considering becoming an NFL owner but then I heard you have to wear a suit on Sundays. I passed.
  13. Look, these new guys have done a great job. I look forward to the finished product in 2-3 years. But Vlad Ducasee over John Miller?
  14. for once, in life, can we a give a rookie some time? one freaking time?
  15. Has anyone ever considered just being a free thinker?
  16. When did trying to stoke public discourse encourage such blind hatred? One group is not showing blind obedience, the other is judging without listening. Which side is more American?
  17. Has anyone ever considered becoming a free thinker?
×
×
  • Create New...