BillsFan17

I have been pretty vocal about that account having been very inaccurate and not reliable at all. Not sure why so many were so willing to hang on every word.

Okay... see here where he says "closing deal with #Bills" That account has thrown multiple guesses at the wall, and has not hit on a single one.

Lol, Broncos it is but, ya know it was last minute lol what a hack

I misread this tweet initially, but seems like the Buccs are really out.

I find it very hard to believe it was strictly money driven. Not saying it had anything to do with Diggs. I just dont see him being overly depended on one last pay day.

That's pretty close

Wouldn't ever rule out the Patriots. Billicheat once won 10 games with Cassel. There is never a real doubt in my mind that the Patriots will be a thorn in our side until the hoodie is gone. That being said, gun to my head, I think the Buccs.

Hes not Trent Richardson level bust, but hes close.

If they end up having to cut him, I'd be all over it. However, no reason to take on that contract.

Let's be fair here. Almost none of the Bills moves have been leaked at all before they were executed. Not even any of the people closest in the know, had any knowledge before hand. This twitter account in the OP has not broke anything Bills related. If there something more concrete linking us to Gordon, I'll be inclined to believe it.

Taylor Weaver Swift Jaylon Johnson Cam Dantzler

I understand the logic of BPA, however, would need to really see who else is on the board, because this would be pretty awful of a draft.

So Michael Thomas seems to love making everything about race, which of course is a real treat. That being said, I'm curious to see how the team leaders in Houston respond to this. Only the ones of color tho, who gives a ***** what Watt thinks on the subject.

Trading for Stefon Diggs... oh wait...

Absolutely, and the way it is structured (Addison) it makes it more palatable. Addison to me is an upgrade to Shaq, but that is a big figure for his age.

Not an ideal number, but...

There is something to be said, in a historically deep draft, two teams many pegged to go WR in the first, traded for established WRs. Not saying it is a knock on the class, because especially in our case, I still think we snag one regardless. But there is food for thought as to why we both choose to go proven instead. Says who? By the looks of the trade, OB valued David Johnson. Stupid as it may be, it's pretty clear that was the main get back for the Texans. What makes you think we would have had what they wanted? Or that the price wouldn't be higher without having the RB involved

Yeah, that still doesnt sway the argument at all. Plenty of the top WRs in this class played with good QBs, plenty with bad and still produced.

Idc if the guy is 52, hes been productive and can absolutely help plug a hole, if nothing for nothing other than good rotational depth. Could be a great mentor to some of the younger DEs we have. Also, still expect them to add.

I mean, honestly is gladly take either, if not both... but again, how legit is the source is what I'd like to know?

Fair enough, any deals would be applicable. Anything that individual has broken, or has the scoop on?

What to his credit did he break that none of the other Bills bloggers didnt? We can afford both.