BillsFan17

Credibility amongst who? Folks on the internet? If you genuinely worry about credibility on a message board that says more about you than it does me. Secondly, it was an important element to point out Allen's yards were lower than we would have liked if you removed the sweep play, BUT THEN FOLLOWED THAT UP WITH HE TOOK WHAT THE DEFENSE GAVE HIM AND DIDN'T TRY TO BEAT THE TITANS SECONDARY. So, if you choose not to be on the attack, and realize I was pointing out Allen wasnt dominant, but did take what the defense was giving him. If you want to interpret that as me having an agenda, by all mean, have a day.

No one said it didnt count. The context of why it was brought up appears to be lost on those that want to band together. Nailed it! Nothing to do with the dichotomy of hand position for Allen that would effect his bottom stat line. But so far today, I'm a drunk, illiterate who has intellectual honesty, and it's not even 10am

My post literally lays out exactly why I did. Read it again, a poster said they didnt watch the game. I made an observation that Allen only had 169 yards if you remove that sweep to McKenzie, but that he did take what the defense was giving him a d didnt try to beat the titans secondary.

A person didnt watch the game, I pointed out that Allen had 169 yards through the air, with one play having been a jet sweep. I also pointed out Allen took what the defense gave him, but that part of the post doesnt count? Moreover, I am not the least bit defensive. I dont know a single person on this message board personally. If I was taking any of this to heart, I'd have bigger issues in life.

Yes, ignore where I literally said that on the bottom half of my post.

Cool

To put it in perspective, there was a jet sweep to McKenzie, but since Allen patted the ball forward to him, instead of handing it to him, it counted as a pass. Take away those 50 yards and Allen had 169 yards passing. Granted, Josh did a good job of taking what the D gave him, didnt try to force besting the Titans Titans secondary. Although there was ANOTHER brutal INT that did lead to points and put us in a tough spot. Which has been routine minus the Giants game. Something that needs to be cleaned up drastically.

I can't read. All I know is I criticized Allen, you jumped in, then back tracked, and now are making fun of my reading skills.

So why is it every cristicsm of Allen is met with bull#### posts like yours? Nice burn

Continue to whine? This is my first posts in this thread. Plus, I posted a criticism of Allen and a few people took exception soooooo

It's the cliche that winning cures all. Enough so that Allen is free of criticism. Which is weak, because there are maybe three or four players on the entire roster whose play is critique free. Being 4-1 doesn't mean there aren't areas we need to improve. One of those areas is turnovers. Not beating the table saying Allen is a bust, but I'm also not going to crown him yet either. Kid has more INTs (19) than games played (17) with 13 fumbles, I'm not just being negative about his play at times for no reason.

I'm literally crediting his TEAM for their success. Try again

You basically spelled out what I said in my metaphor of being the savior of the burning house, only to have been the one to have lit it on fire in the first place. What's nonsensical is ignoring the defense has carried this team despite Allen during large chunks of games. My post is a slam? Or are you just looking for someone to try and start with?

Immense contributions? The kid has how many turnovers? It's like praising the guy who saved the burning house, only to find out hes the one who lit it on fire to begin with. Allen has taken strides this year, that's obvious, but hes also still had a lot of struggles which are obvious. I'd be willing to bet, you put Allen on a team with a bottom ranked D, and there is not a chance he has four wins under his belt.

Yeah, this guy isnt legit. When you have to tweet this out, you are probably a hack.

Has anyone else reported Perry being signed?

If it was a slam dunk that Webb was going to be called up, why wouldnt they have done it already? They are waiting until the absolute last minute on Saturday at 4PM. Either that, or they are really dragging this out making the Titans gameplan for the possibility of Allen or Barkley.

Insert generic "if the price is right" response

Tyrod sucked

What about Allen makes anyone think the turnovers will come down? I dont have a doubt in my mind Allen is healthily over 20 INTs on the year.

Coming into this game, Allen had almost as many INTs as games played and almost as many fumbles as games played. This isn't just a Patriots game issue. The Pats are a phenomenal defense, but to act like this is a outlier game is incorrect. End of the day, no I dont want Edwards 2.0 or Tyrod 2.0, but the turnovers and inability to make the correct reads or be accurate is concerning over this period of starts.

That in no way proves your point. Considering Hackett was a first time OC. Entirely possible, seeing as how bad he was in Buffalo, that his offensive system wasnt overly intricate or hard to grasp.

This is the absolute worst take. Manuel was too dumb?

110%. Kid is what he is and if you expect to be a consistent winning team with him, you are backing the wrong horse. The turnovers are just piling up week and week and kid just doesn't seem to get it.

Hes not wrong. The officiating is a ***** joke.