BillsFan17

Not sensitive at all. There just isn't much debate to be had with someone who thinks Milano is just easily replaceable. https://www.google.com/amp/s/theathletic.com/1457112/2019/12/13/how-matt-milano-is-quietly-becoming-one-of-the-best-matchup-linebackers-in-the-nfl/%3famp Considered one of the best matchup LBs in the league. But because he was a draft day steal, we should just as easily replace him with another late round gem.

The fact you think Milano is just easily replaceable... not much more really here to say

If that's the play people use for their argument against Milano, then they are not worth arguing with. They have shown the hand they are playing with and it's short a few cards.

The utter disrespect for what Milano brings to the table is insane to me. All these capologist on TBD, sitting at their keyboard/with their phone, just undervaluing Milano like hes ***** fodder.

If he did, might be one hell of a detective. That was some pretty nifty dot connecting.

In simple terms its value of players lost vs. value of players brought in. So if we lose those guys, and dont replace them with equal or better, its entirely possible we could get compensatory picks in return.

That's just a guess on your part?

If the price is right, by all means go get one of the big three, however, we don't know what the cost will be. And unless this team fills a lot of holes in FA. Listening to Joe Marino the other day, apparently a lot of people he respects were telling him the Bills arent linked to any of the big name FAs. That they are going to be a build thru the draft team... Tells me I can see them more likely to move around in the later rounds, instead of giving up what it could take to get up from 22 high enough to get one of the big three.

People who convert teams arent real fans. Barring their original team being relocated or abolished all together.

Market share plays a big part of things. Which makes what Ruggs accomplished all that more impressive.

Maturity has nothing to do with it.

If you arent impressed with his "tape" then there isnt much anyone is going to be able to help ya with. Because if Ruggs doesnt impress you, you probably aren't watching his tape or have any idea what it is you are looking at.

I genuinely don't understand why anyone gives a ***** what that woman says. If the looks are why you hang on her every word. Newsflash its 2020 and fake Instagram models are a dime a dozen.

If Knox could catch, hed easily be in the discussion as one of the better young TEs. However, there is still a lot of room to grow, and I think its telling the Bills wanted to bring in someone like Olsen to help mentor/groom Knox. e.g. how Gore helped Singletary. That being said, I'd still like to try and upgrade the position. Need a more surehanded target. Allen clearly liked utilizing the TE, just need more consistancy.

Claypool is not and will never be a TE. Even if they decided to label him as a TE, hell be a Big Slot. Which has been more and more of a trend in today's NFL. That being said, I think Claypool may take a little time getting adjusted to getting a good release at the NFL level, but his abilities are off the charts.

Some of the best WRs in the league were drafted outside of the first round, so yes. Especially in a very deep class.

I loved what he brought, but more so in the form of mentorship. I loved from day one, walking thru the halls of OBD with the helmet on lol. Good luck moving forward.

Maybe not the ninth overall, but possibly the 20th overall which they hold as well. Which, could make Beane feel like he has more maneuverability to get around. The way he did after swapping firsts with the Bengals (the Cordy Glenn trade). And truth be told, I'd much prefer Foles to Barkley in a pinch.

Jags trading off players, while trying to convince Yannick of the "bigger picture," bold strategy.

Now, that would be some very interesting maneuvering!! Do you think they would be inclined to give up the higher of their two first rounders tho? Especially considering the saving to their cap isnt all that much, if I'm not mistaken.

"You're being hyperbolic..." as I point out a variety of plays that helped result in a lose... Then you follow it up with two or three plays by a WR win us that game.. You are 100% right, a WR absolutely wins us that game. Nailed it. Nothing else about that game mattered, two or three plays by a WR win us the game. You are undoubtedly, unabashedly, without question right.

And there were also other noticeable problems throughout the year we could use draft capital on, including both OL/DL which are vastly more crucial than WR. The best part of this whole thing, I absolutely love Lamb, an very high on Jeudy and think Ruggs is a very good spec as well. This has zero to do with wanting to add that level of prospect to this team.

There is no point in going back and forth. There were a handful if not more plays that were/weren't made that cost the Bills that game. You believe it was solely not having a WR, again that's a fine opinion to have. The fact that Allen fell apart in the fourth, the fact they took points off the board for no reason, the fact they had a phantom call on Cody Ford, the fact that Beasley was drastically underutilized, the fact Daboll sputtered in the second half... But yes, the only factor that matters is WR. I'm done debating the Bills losing to the Texans solely because a WR or lack there of.

Does it make a difference? It's entirely possible it makes a difference, does it clearly win us the game? Absolutely not. There were a variety of factors that lost us that game. And to tell me a WR would have been the deciding factor is pushing a narrative. I put out a handful of examples to plays that effected the outcome that didnt have anything to do with the WR position at all. Yet, seemingly none of those matter because WR!!!!

1) What position are you moving up the board for? 2) How did the Bills do in FA? 3) Did the Bills extend any of their own? 4) How much capital is it going to cost both this year and next? There are a lot of factors when you look into trading up. I dont expect to Bills to use all nine picks. Very unrealistic to assume nine rookies make the roster. So I can see Beane moving around the board, but the aforementioned factors mentioned will play a big part in where he moves.