Jump to content

BillsFan17

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BillsFan17

  1. I have been local against trading up in this class, but this does seem like it could help push the big three down a bit. Also, if some of these linemen are unobtainable, it's likely the Jets may pass on WR as well in order to get line help.
  2. This might be one of the worst trades in the history of the sport. That being said, many people have the Cards pegged to snag a WR at eight. Now likely they wont, AND the Texans still don't have a first.
  3. Would be absolutely incredible to land him.
  4. The injury history is worthy of taking pause. Factor in the contract, I like his game, but those two things, if the price is really cheap asset wise to acquire him, but...
  5. Hell get greatly overpaid and good for him for getting his. I'll miss him, but not worthy of getting into a bidding war over.
  6. The less holes you go into the draft with the better. Makes it all that much easier to take BPA. I think whatever vet the Bills bring in, wouldn't prevent them from taking another back in this class,. Another back I'd like to see Buffalo pursue.
  7. I mean, Van wasn't overly productive. Phenomenal technician/route runner, that goes without say. However, hell also be 24 before he ever plays an NFL game and is nothing special athletically, like at all. Van would absolutely be a great complementary type WR pick if we double dip, but if you are taking Van over Justin... not a good look.
  8. O'Brien is not good at his job, now that hes elevated to GM/HC, it's only going to get worse.
  9. Levi Wallace was not good last year, Kevin Johnson may or may not be coming back, Norman is not good. The Bills would absolutely be wise to look to add. Most likely via the draft. Again, far from being set outside of Tre at CB
  10. Not all Bills fans. I know I certainly dont want to give up what it will cost to acquire him.
  11. His contract is not too bad, however, the cost it would take to get Hopkins...might be way too steep. Obviously I'm not about to say you can get Hopkins in this draft, but with how good this draft look at WR and how good next years look at WR... might be a little hesitant to dish out the capital from A-Z to acquire him.
  12. Which would be the best course of action. We should draft to try and keep the cost control from getting out of hand. Like you said Tre is about to get his money, need to have good affordable options across from him. There are also a lot of very good options in this draft, if it does happen that is lol.
  13. I think Reader will be the big add. Other than that, I dont expect them to go crazy. They will have to extend their own and make sure they have money up the sleeve for the upcoming years.
  14. Far from set, but Trufant will likely be out of our price range.
  15. I think the Titans are making the correct call staying the course with Tannehill.
  16. Wonder if Buffalo now becomes a bit more aggressive, or if they start slinging that money to resign their own. I wonder if the contracts will be a little bit different with the additional game(s).
  17. Well, we pick in the 50s in the second, not 33. So there is a big discrepancy in when I'd feel comfortable as a selection for the Bills. I do like Taylor, a lot. I went on to say I think you van justify him as a first round selection. Now, into he context of the Bills, a first round RB is bad asset management.
  18. Not at 22, but man, I'd take him in the second in a heartbeat. Hell likely not last very long, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Taylor go in the first.
  19. I think this means that we could realistically factor an edge rusher high in the draft.
  20. All very good points. Especially the ability to play a larger role potentially, and the Ravens are more SB contenders present day than the Bills
  21. Thats why I choose to say sentiment in my post in regards to DPJ. Because there was also a lack on his end.
×
×
  • Create New...