Jauronimo

If there's one thing we know for sure about Goodell and the NFL's enforcement of the personal conduct policy; if there's video, you're f@#$ed!!

Neither of which has anything to do with Bob Kraft's businesses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraft_Group

Bob Kraft is not related to Kraft Foods.

Bob Kraft supports human trafficking and my righteous indignation knows no bounds!!!! Please let the social justice movement in this country turn its full attention on Bob Kraft and turn this into the biggest public takedown since Weinstein.

Whats the scouting report on this guy? Is he about that China food?

You should consider changing your avatar in order to eliminate confusion between you and @Gugny. Maybe something a little more Trans positive?

The Bills have repeatedly shown that they will NOT tolerate any impropriety from their teammates when it comes to women. Infidelity, objectification, verbal abuse, alleged physical abuse, and hot chicks parties are all verboten. Behavior like this liable to get you kicked off of the bus and stranded on the Jersey turnpike.

I guess its a good thing @JoshAllenHasBigHands isn't running the country or we would all be living under Sharia law.

Reported!! Take your Pornography to the MLB Forum!!

Its your biological drive to do so. Totally understandable. I guess I don't recognize your authority on the topic of morality. Do you even have a beard?

Just because you're a prude with an antiquated notion of acceptable relationship structures doesn't mean the rest of us must abide by your old testament wisdom from an era when life expectancy was 26 years old.

Since when is it immoral to have options?

God told him to "lead" Ciara and for them together to tell kids to "Just Say No"! To sex. Makes you wonder what God told 50 Cent, Future, Amare, and lil bow wow with regards to Ciara. Pretty sure it was the opposite.

This team has zero identity. They aren't fast, they aren't tough, they aren't solid defensively, they aren't going to burn you in transition, and they aren't going to force you into mistakes with pressure. They control the puck pretty well and have a decent neutral zone game but they have a hard time getting the puck back after they lose it. There are some guys on this roster who might pan out and turn into something but history suggests don't get your hopes up. Looking at you Tage and Mittelstadt. We have our familiar try hard midgets like Sheary who is filling the Gerbe role nicely and ERod who will be playing the part of Ennis but with far less production. Ristolainen has an incredible -23 plus/minus. I don't have a point here, I'm just impressed. Sobotka somehow is -14 which can only be explained by his increased minutes of late. Good call, Phil.

I have never seen a team this soft when it matters. I hold my breath at the end and beginning of every period. If they give up a goal you can bet they'll give up another one shortly thereafter. They fade as the game goes on which is amazing given the age of this team. What a waste of time that was.

What about assault revolvers?

I agree with your point. Food stamps and "don't feed the animals" is a stupid way to make that point. The proliferation of snappy political memes which at first glance seem reasonable but quickly fall apart under any scrutiny is dumbing down our discourse. These graphics are all over social media and I see them all too commonly accepted as gospel. I think its fair game to breakdown the metaphor or analogy especially when TTYT asked how the logic could be debated.

Is it your opinion that the U.S. Dept of the Interior is concerned about the work ethic of the animals inhabiting their parks? You do understand that the animals in the equation already know "how to fish", right? Some of them quite literally know how to fish. Food stamps and "teach a man to fish" could be compared and debated in terms of intent and applicability but "don't feed the animals" and teach a man to fish is some next level stupidity. Not every snappy saying and old timey parable that shapes your worldview should be compared our used interchangeably.

I forgot what it was like to see drivel from the dawn of the internet age recycled as sage wisdom. I didn't realize you were so touchy about broad mentions of the main players in U.S. politics. Substitute ideology for [any political party] if it makes you feel better and my point is the same. Simplifying topics of political debate to a point so free of nuance or context where they can be easily compared to a matter of black and white or right and wrong can be good for a laugh but should not be should not be confused with actual thought.

Profound. Do you really believe that food stamps are an issue because human beings are losing the ability to forage for themselves or have you simply never met a political meme critical of Dems you don't like? In other words its a trash metaphor and my original point was completely lost on you. I have a hard time taking people seriously that rant about how dumb the left/right/liberal/conservatives are while sharing email forwards which conclude something snappy like "even a class of 3rd graders gets it. Why can't [insert political party]?" If your political beliefs are so simple and free of nuance that they can be encapsulated in a tweet/meme and easily explained to an elementary school classroom then you're a moron.

Its not just about dependence. Its about animals maintaining their healthy fear of human beings for their safety and ours. You do not want grizzly bears to associate seeing humans with an easy snack. Also, animals should not be consuming Doritos, white bread, and other scraps from humans. They lack the ability to digest most of the ***** we eat. Its a Facebook trope borrowed from some yahoo mail email forward from 20 years ago which oversimplifies and twists two points to deliver something which seems clever and falls apart even under the most superficial scrutiny. Aside from that, its not dumb at all.

How dare you marginalize the feelings that might be felt by Tom in the event that a man were actually attacked in the way that Jussie Smallette allegedly WAS attacked in a way that it is entirely possible and perhaps even plausible that he could have been attacked?!?!?!

If you did a modicum of research you might understand how illegal border crossings occur in the areas that are not covered by existing walls. But you haven't and yet you want to be taken seriously. I'll give you a ***** hint, there aren't 5 lane super highways running across the Sonoran and Rio Grande which the border patrol simply doesn't know about. If it can help "even 1" is the most asinine argument possible. "Spend billions on a problem because if it helps even one person, isn't it worth it?"

But not hard enough to, ya know, actually do any. If you say so. The multi-billion dollar drug and human trafficking industry faces the greatest supply chain bottleneck of all time as hundreds of people and donkeys carry billions of dollars worth of contraband across miles and miles of rough terrain.

Its also true that a wall does nothing to combat most of the trafficking which is occurring through legal points of entry.