Jump to content

HerdMenatlity1

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,733
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HerdMenatlity1

  1. The thing is, do they meet the criteria as someone who got on twitter to call him soft? If so, then yes he was talking about them. If they didn't get on twitter to mock him, then he wasn't referring to them. He made it clear this message was to the people on twitter calling him soft, not to just anyone not playing in the NFL. The tweet even starts off with "To all the people that have a problem with me being injured". Me thinks you is kinda sensitive.
  2. It's a tweet. He's not righting an esay.
  3. In your scenario we would have Kiko on IR and Sproles(assuming he would sign here) as opposed to Mccoy. I'd rather have McCoy than Sproles and Kiko on IR at this point. Before you say 'who knew Kiko would get hurt?, I'm just doing this revisionist thing like you are.
  4. Kiko is a star?!?! Stop it!!
  5. Did you read the part where he says film shows he's open, a lot? Targets SHOULD be a function of getting open, but that's not happening here. I get that he has missed time, but the film doesn't lie. He is open a lot. And if they roll coverage, move him around the los sometimes.
  6. Having Watkins, Karlos and McCoy out makes this a completely different offense, and not in a good way. Thanks Defense, Taylor and Hogan!
  7. Where did you read he is best used as a decoy? I don't see it. Quit putting your words into other people's posts. What a bunch of crap.
  8. Just drove back up to n fl. from down there and it's hard to play in that heat if you haven't been conditioned to it. That's my concern. Damn it's hot down there!
  9. Don't forget, on average they are fatter too.
  10. Did you read the op's 1st post? If you did, this question you ask is pretty stupid. Ohhhh, sarcasm?! My bad. Stop it, if you read the 1st post you would know what the debate really is. I know you read the 1st one, so you know what he is referring to. Do you also correct someone who uses to instead of too?
  11. It's not hard at all to say he NAILED it. As I stated earlier, that's just me. But if it makes you feel better, you are right, you were close too. Ok?!
  12. Since you already started the "EJ" thing on page 1, I'll go with under 2 pages. Sure it does.
  13. All he said was to pursue a 1st or 2nd and third, he didn't imply we would get it. Maybe we asked for a high pick and negotiated to the current deal. I'd say he NAILED it. But that's just me.
  14. SQUISH THE FISH!!!
  15. If you watched the game and not just look at stats, TT and the online sucked today. That's all the op said. You act like your evaluation on his take is important. Go ahead and look past the 4 tds, you might actually see what the op was talking about.If you can't see they played pretty bad most of the game, your evaluation means squat.
  16. Yea, I started him on mine, but I don't care, we won the game.
  17. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NP7_SIRfo-c
  18. I cut and pasted from Bleacher Report, maybe this has something to do with it. The $2.35 million base salary doesn't become guaranteed until after Week 1 of the 2015 season. In the event that Jackson's play declines this season to a point where the Bills either need to cut him or he retires before Week 1, the Bills are only on the hook for the $100,000 workout bonus.Jul 30, 2014
  19. Wow!! to your avatar!!!
  20. but it's still a fumble, right?!?!?
  21. If you bought season tix based on Fred alone, your bad, not Terry's.
  22. 1st off I LOVE FREDDY! But that run reminded me of the scene on any given sunday where coach shows a clip to show what happens when a rb loses even a 1/2 step. A younger, faster rb would not have been caught. I know the rb had to see the cutback lane like Freddy did, but the point it clear. He's slower now and has been hurt the past couple of seasons. Again I love Freddy but this is a move that is not too surprising .
×
×
  • Create New...