QCity

It's about time for EJ to just spin aimlessly into a sack on this drive.

That was about as easy as it gets.

lol call me crazy, but I don't remember the Cutler thread from last year. Or like, ever.

Here's the play: Edit: %^&$ing YouTube

The Brady Rule, which is better known as the Treat All QBs Like Princesses Rule. It's ruining the sport.

It's like a bald, unemployed, 500+ lb man who lives in his parents basement shooting down the women from the JC Penny's catalog. Victoria's Secret or bust!

Welp so much for that. And McCown is going to be 35 next summer, no way are they giving him a 5 year deal.

I agree with most of what you said, especially that it's still early. But c'mon man you titled this thread "Kelly 86 vs Manuel 13," what did you expect? I bet a lot of the hand wringing would subside if we could actually see EJ throw the ball over 15 yards in the air. I'm not talking bombs, just deep outs and middle seam routes. Right now it's just a QB who spins in the pocket and fires 5 yard checkdowns (and he does fire those screen passes like a laser for some reason). I'm sure it's not all him, Hackett calls a conservative passing game, but you can't statistically compare 2 QBs that are almost 30 years apart.

Watch the play where Revis hits Woods. EJ feels phantom pressure and does his spin move, while Glenn buries the rusher lol. EJ spun into at least 2 sacks that way.

The Bickering Bills didn't come around until 89 when they started winning and developed some egos. And it may not sound like much, but Kelly came in and threw for over 3500 yards, which at the time was crazy. Throwing for 3000 yards in a season was the bar to reach for QBs in the mid-80s.

This board is slipping - 4 pages and nobody has compared him to Edwards 08 yet.

Teeth gnashing seems to have subsided, air is still heavy with whine. Ledge is still pretty packed and Tuesday has a forecast of whimpering all day until the late evening.

Column was spot on. The team mailed that game in.

until 2016 no less!!!

Starting to understand why Robey went undrafted.

Houston comeback game only sold 76,000. In the minds of the Toronto apologists this means that winning does not translate to more ticket sales.

Nope. I think that qualifies as quadrupling down.

He thinks RWS is no advantage over Toronto, and has been doubling (tripling?) down on that stupidity all week.

It makes the Buffalo market less attractive. It's clearly evident that it's only a temporary money grab for the team, and a way for Rogers to position itself as a potential buyer. We now know that the people of Toronto will never root for a team from a different city (this could be drastically different if it were their own team). This money grab has no long term future, the only question is - will it end next year or will we have to suffer for the remaining 4 games there? Do you honestly think a prospective buyer of this team would believe that this series has any legs past the current deal?? If the next owner is a "financial shark" that is only interested in the bottom line, then the team is 100% gone and the debacle that is the Toronto series will have nothing to do with it. The Buffalo market will always be handicapped in terms of luxury box sales and corporate seating, and this has become the big money maker for owners over the past decade. However, I'm quite certain Toronto companies haven't started buying up our suites. What's keeping people people out of the seats is a culture of losing and that fact that ownership places financial goals above winning. There are college kids out there that can't remember a playoff game - this organization has literally lost a generation of fans. This team hasn't been over .500 in a decade, it's a miracle that any games sellout. "Win and the games will sell" is the mantra - but do you not see the folly in attempting to be competitive while at the same time selling away home games? Insular and narrow-minded? You might want to take a glace in the mirror, because you are simply parroting Mr. Brandon.

Last year at this time Geno Smith was a lock to go #1 and there was no way Manti Te'o would drop to us. It's a bit early...just sayin'

No margin for error in the NFL

Pete Rozelle banned it back in 1960 - he wants teams making lots and lots of $$$$$$$$. Article V, Section 4 of the NFL constitution, the “Green Bay Rule,” says that “charitable organizations and/or corporations not organized for profit and not now a member of the league may not hold membership in the National Football League.” The right way? The Green Bay way

Let me see if I got this straight - if they cut the Toronto series off and we revert to playing 8 home games at the Ralph, that will open the door to move the team to LA in 2020? I think you Toronto apologists have been brainwashed.

I get your point. I never saw us beating Tampa or NE on the road anyways (I wasn't expecting a playoff run - winning 6 in a row was ludicrous forum-talk). But just because we can't beat a 2-9 team on a neutral site doesn't justify playing that team on a neutral site. And I'm being generous with the term "neutral."

That quote sums up this thread. Hey guys, stop blaming the stadium for the loss, but oh by the way if we didn't play in that stadium we would have won.