zonabb

Stupid.

Well, now we can officially,start discussing the draft.

This is a different 3-5 team? They have to prove it first In a game like this.

If you thought a 3rd string UDFA QB was gonna play a mistake free game in his first NFL start against an 8-0 team you're living in a fantasy world. History, statistics,and probability say they win this game 5 out of 100 times. P.S. that why Easley rides the bench.

Numark where are you?????? This story has been written countless times and once again today.

Ground hog day.

It was a classic case of the bills motto... Anything that an go wrong, will.

Awesome... My line all the time. Groundhog Day

+1 Psychology is everything. At some point this tem needs to break the mold and change the psychology of perpetual losing. Maybe but I doubt it.

Except that it was the right call

He's wide open cuz his guy stood there waiting for the slant. It was designed to go where it went.. Except the defender was in the space.

No, I'll be here to watch it come true.

Game over. This is where they collapse because all their efforts have gone for naught and they're psychologically beat now.

That's the bills we know

Stereotypes get perpetuated By dbags like dierdork. Says its unseasonably cold, in the 30s. Ugh,it's 42 in OP right now.

Here's where they run once and head to the room.

Except the shoulder was right to his face and was obviously intentional. So if you're heavy, you can't have a personal foul against you? Yeah that makes sense.

Think not, the ball wasn't catchable for one and he threw his shoulder at the receiver. Good call.

My biggest frustration with "professional" football players is stupidity, which is a common affliction on this team. 3 unacceptable mental mistakes so far.... Block in the back, personal foul, and the poster boy for stupidity not falling the ball because he's acting selfish because he wants a "me" moment. Sad it's the same dumb plays that get made but you can't fix stupid, it's for life.

24-10 Chefs. Too much DL talent for the Chiefs spells trouble with this line and whoever is playing QB. At least one turnover by the QB leads to a TD for the Chiefs.

First define "fair" and define "rate." Fair and rate and not mutually exclusive. Any rating is going to result in a ranked list, correct? So the best way if you really wanted, to be empirical, would be to develop an index (like QB rating or QBR) based on variables that everyone considers "fair" (ie, they're relevant... wins matter but height doesn't and isn't a fair varuable so Doug Flutie doesn't lose points!). Then you weight certain variables... Super Bowls are weighted more than regular season wins. It gets to be cumbersome, complex and still arguably subjective. I also think the QB Rating and QBR attempts in some way to do this... All that aside, I look at it this way.... who would I want starting for my team in one Super Bowl in his prime. Or whose career would I take to enjoy for its totality and his team's success and the answer is clear... Tom Brady hands down. Although in my lifetime of being a fan includes some of the greats, Brady is the guy. I believe in cerebral QBs and I'd take Montana second, Manning third. You want to standardize or normal stats to compare guys across eras and schemes... look at TD to INT ratios. A high TD total is meaningless if you're comparing this era to prior eras given the propensity to pass more. But the TD:INT ratio, in my mind, explains decision making and brains and not turning the ball over is certainly a predictive variable for wins. Brady's ratio is 2.69:1. Manning's 2.17:1. Montana's 1.96:1 and Marino's who I think is the most overrated QB of my lifetime was a dismal 1.66:1. Any by the way Montana had some guy name Rice he threw too and Manning some dudes named Harrison and Wayne. Brady's cast of characters is a litany of number 2 QBs. The problem here is, people have so much distain, like I used to for Brady, that they refuse to look at the guy objectively, instead trying to cut him down with stupid arguments like "He didn't kick the SB winning FGs." SO myopic.

As an unabashed critic of our local "media" I will stand by Buscaglia as the only one worth my time. He's not a homer nor always taking the negative angle. He takes a measured approach to his analysis, forgot more than the others know, and comes through with analysis based on rational thought rather than a need to be emotional, ouandish or miserable as a means to move the needle. Guys like him end up at national outlets, the rest are lifers here.

This guy sucks and Hackett is letting him throw down field more than EJ.

Done like dinner. FG was all they needed. Tuel sucks and of they get 20 yards the rest of be game we should feel lucky. The defense is overworked thanks to hacketts early play calling and the ej injury resulting it atrocious offense. It's all over by but the countdown"

Over anyway. D is smoked and the O ain't putting up a point