Jump to content

BringBackFergy

Community Member
  • Posts

    19,168
  • Joined

Everything posted by BringBackFergy

  1. Heres your stats: Tyrod is 6ft ( not 6ft 1 inch as he claims) Our O linemen are: Seantrel 6ft 7 Cordy 6ft 6 Dawkins 6ft 6 Wood 6ft 4 Ducasse 6ft 6 So Tyrods Height to O Line Ratio is -4 inches on average. Look at the winning teams this year and over the last five years. The standard QB to o-line ratio is -1 to zero. (The higher the QB height to oline ratio the better). That being said, our oline is wayyyy too tall for our QB. Whats the answer? Draft and acquire shorter and squattier olineman. Ideally we need olineman 5ft8inches to 5ft10inches at 320-330 pounds. Heres why: 1) Shorter O Lineman, then Tyrod can see better. Same with TEs. Shorter the better. 2) Before anyone says shorter guys arent able to manage an o line, think of this: back in 1976, the Dolphins had a shorter oline and dominated. 3) You ever hear the expression low man wins???? Well, lets put our money where our mouth is and get a head start. Low man (shorter man) is already 40% of the way there...and if the lower/shorter/squattier man wins, I see no downside. So Im pretty sure the shorter the olineman, the better. Flame away if you want but the stats speak for themselves.
  2. I can't believe you would make a statement like you did without any research or facts to back it up!!!! This is the kinda crap that fills this board. LOL Laughable LOL
  3. Easy brah Guess how we learned about Brandon Spikes a few years ago when he joined the Bills? Yeah...a doctor's office at UB
  4. Who do we need to lose this week?
  5. On a postive note: we dont have to worry about a shootout today. 🙁
  6. Happy Birthday sir!
  7. Wait. I thought all the Rams had to do was run Bubble Screens all day to Sammy? Would be an automatic win. Dumb Rams.
  8. Well done. Have to see the big picture.
  9. I did the same thing to my Plitoris last year.
  10. I saw the Instagram video. Clay had a DB on his ass and a safety coming up from the back. Seriously??
  11. Cool. Then its stupid to assume wed be 5-0 if we retained Sammy. Thats what I thought.
  12. LOL. LOL. Great logic. Nope. Cant compare the same player on two different fields. Good play or piss poor play. And Sammy didnt catch a ball today, not because of the great Legion...it was because LA has so many other weapons (like Robert Woods...and Kupp). Lol
  13. Kelly the Dog said we cant compare Sammy on the Rams to having Sammy on this team. Your argument fails.
  14. What the hell are you looking at in the bottom pic. I see nothing.
  15. Hey Einstein...you jumped on my ass for a comment to Figster who said the Bills would likely be 5-0 if we retained Sammy. How is it that your in-depth criticism didnt pick up on that gem of analysis? Same concept you are criticizing right?
  16. lol. God Ive drunk too much today. And noticed my apostrophies arent working on my cell phone.
  17. Oh come on...we all need a chance to let some steam off. Even if this topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Lol
  18. Cool. We can trade one pile of sludge for a bag of glass?
  19. Damn!!! Those screen shots tell the whole story.....of what I have no idea. The circled WR disappeared in the second pic. Thanks for that....I think. 🤔
  20. Why would you want a WR with four targets today and zero catches?
  21. Is there a time zone change overseas?? If so, has your opinion of Tyrod changed yet? Please give us a heads up when we should like him again. Dick head
  22. Again? Again? So just in case we missed your point based on your name, you decided to repeat yourself. !@#$ing ridiculous.
  23. Nice try. Stop crying about SW14 and his Facebook merchandise...hes gone and wouldnt have helped when you have a QB that cant decide whether to throw, run or take a ****. Dumb argument if you ask me.
  24. Absolutely. Sammy was 0-0 with 4 targets today. He would have killed it today in Cinci!!! Love how you fellas say Ive been saying this for weeks. Show me the link.
  25. Link to your like Ive been saying allll week??
×
×
  • Create New...