BringBackFergy

Because....just because

Why do people question a theory which makes sense. Tailor your o line to meet the attributes of your QB. If Pederson was starting at QB, we could get away with a 6ft2 or 6ft3 o line (that would be a -1 to +1 ratio) but with Taylor, we are way out of whack on the QB to O Line Height ratio. Only answer is to adjust our O line height to meet the optica of the standard ESPN height ratio.

Im not attacking you and just because someone has a new approach to the o-line issue and Tyrods inability to find WRs, doesnt mean a thread has to be closed. But if you think about it, the bigger they are, the harder they fall comes to mind with Ducasse and Dawkins, dont you agree? If low man wins (and that applies to o line as well as d line), dont you think passing lanes are increased if you have a QB to O Line height ratio of -1 to +2??

Just because logic escapes you doesnt mean its idiotic. You need to learn to push the envelope. I have a feeling thats why McDermott is shopping Cordy Glenn. 6ft 6inch guy with a bum ankle WHO CANNOT GET LOW. Dont doubt it. Hes looking for shorter and stout O Lineman in the 5ft 10inch range.

You show me Fluties QB to O Line ratio and youll see my point.

Not sure which stats you are referring too.

You guys can laugh all you want but the physics of the theory prove you wrong.

Well have to agree to disagree but there are plenty of 5ft10inch guys with 43 inch arms. And why do people say low man wins if it isnt true? It is. So Ill stay with that concept. Plus, Ritchie is 6ft3inch so you see my point.

I mean a guy with lower center of gravity. Low man wins.

Heres your stats: Tyrod is 6ft ( not 6ft 1 inch as he claims) Our O linemen are: Seantrel 6ft 7 Cordy 6ft 6 Dawkins 6ft 6 Wood 6ft 4 Ducasse 6ft 6 So Tyrods Height to O Line Ratio is -4 inches on average. Look at the winning teams this year and over the last five years. The standard QB to o-line ratio is -1 to zero. (The higher the QB height to oline ratio the better). That being said, our oline is wayyyy too tall for our QB. Whats the answer? Draft and acquire shorter and squattier olineman. Ideally we need olineman 5ft8inches to 5ft10inches at 320-330 pounds. Heres why: 1) Shorter O Lineman, then Tyrod can see better. Same with TEs. Shorter the better. 2) Before anyone says shorter guys arent able to manage an o line, think of this: back in 1976, the Dolphins had a shorter oline and dominated. 3) You ever hear the expression low man wins???? Well, lets put our money where our mouth is and get a head start. Low man (shorter man) is already 40% of the way there...and if the lower/shorter/squattier man wins, I see no downside. So Im pretty sure the shorter the olineman, the better. Flame away if you want but the stats speak for themselves.

I can't believe you would make a statement like you did without any research or facts to back it up!!!! This is the kinda crap that fills this board. LOL Laughable LOL

Easy brah Guess how we learned about Brandon Spikes a few years ago when he joined the Bills? Yeah...a doctor's office at UB

Who do we need to lose this week?

On a postive note: we dont have to worry about a shootout today. 🙁

Happy Birthday sir!

Wait. I thought all the Rams had to do was run Bubble Screens all day to Sammy? Would be an automatic win. Dumb Rams.

Well done. Have to see the big picture.

I did the same thing to my Plitoris last year.

I saw the Instagram video. Clay had a DB on his ass and a safety coming up from the back. Seriously??

Cool. Then its stupid to assume wed be 5-0 if we retained Sammy. Thats what I thought.

LOL. LOL. Great logic. Nope. Cant compare the same player on two different fields. Good play or piss poor play. And Sammy didnt catch a ball today, not because of the great Legion...it was because LA has so many other weapons (like Robert Woods...and Kupp). Lol

Kelly the Dog said we cant compare Sammy on the Rams to having Sammy on this team. Your argument fails.

What the hell are you looking at in the bottom pic. I see nothing.

Hey Einstein...you jumped on my ass for a comment to Figster who said the Bills would likely be 5-0 if we retained Sammy. How is it that your in-depth criticism didnt pick up on that gem of analysis? Same concept you are criticizing right?

lol. God Ive drunk too much today. And noticed my apostrophies arent working on my cell phone.