artmalibu

If he plays a 17 game season it looks likely, he missed 6 games one year and 2 another and was with in 80 yards. He is likely to be a bigger part of the plan with the Bills considering the other outside receivers they have. I mentioned nothing about TDs because the Bills run the ball in the red zone , they had 3 more than any other team last year. Your comparison to Rousseau is idiotic!!! The 2 other guys needed 25 games to get to 660 yards. So, yea I would rather have Palmer this year than run it back with the 2 other guys.

The last 3 years he had 769, 581, 584 so it looks likely to me...

Could be the same reason the Colts traded us Jerry Hughes.....

This guy may not have had great production in the past, but his win rate against man is very good. The Bills WRs are not good at beating man. Teams could line up in man and crowd the box and take away the run and send more presser after 17. This singing is about scheme, he is a piece of the puzzle that the Bills dont otherwise have.

Or drafting a the back of the 1st round its harder to land a stud, so rarely getting a bust is a good thing...

I bet the nay sayers here drafted Kincade on their fantasy team and had a bad year.... Likely the same folks who lite up the forum with the cut Brown BS.

The team scored the 2nd most points in the league, Allen was down 600 yards over the year before. The #1 receiver only had 821 yards. So, throwing the ball around was not the plan. He was the 3rd most productive pass catcher on the team after missing almost a quarter of the season, and playing several games hurt. Im excited to see what he will do in 2025!!

Over the last 2 years Laporta has 500 more yards in 4 more games on a team that throws the ball more. Kincaid holds the Bills franchise record for most receptions by a rookie and was held back in year 2 by an injury. One guy is a "straight up weapon" and the other is a dud?

It seems that not many TEs are great in their first few years. Last year the Bills were a run heavy team, the player missed several games with injury and was not right the rest of the season. At the end of the day if the team has a reliable 6 yard play guy I will take it....

With a max of 8 mil a year, it should be easy to see he is a great value. In the last 3 years he has .5 of a sack less than Von Miller. The last 2 years in the playoffs in 3 games he had 1 sack while Von Miller had 0 in 4 games. And he has made game changing plays on special teams.

After reading a ton of posts here I did not see anyone say he had 3 blocked kicks last year. Versatile, athletic, high motor and smart. Looks like a great add....

Maybe not a sexy pickup but looks like the right fit. If he can beat man coverage like they say he can its a big win since that seemed to be missing. I like this pickup because the D needs the real help imo. DK cost a 2nd round pick and 30 million a year. So, they can use the 18 million and the 2nd to get the help the D needs. The offense scored the 2nd most points in the league and in theory this guy can provide the needed help on game day.

So you have 10 guys in the top 10 without counting T Johnson. My thought is that should be enough top end to get the job done. I see that the bottom end of the starters/rotational players is the bigger issue. I feel that we have too many player that rank outside of the top 25 at their position. To get a for sure top 5 guy is has to come from a FA and that takes a kings ransom contract and possibly draft capital, resources the Bills are not rich in. So the question becomes is the team better off by bringing in 1 top five guy or improving 3 or 4 positions that would require the same resources. Its a good debate. If the Bills could land Myles and go from 18th in sacks to #1 it might be worth whatever it takes. But could the same usage of resources be used to improve the DT, safety and CB positions to improve pass rush and create more coverage sacks. Also, improve the run defense, pass brake-ups an interceptions. I dont like putting all the eggs in one basket and feel its safer to use the whole is greater than the sum of its parts approach.

Cooper is #70 on the list, so we had 3... If we kept Poyer we would have had 4. I dont this Poyer would have moved the needle much, if at all. The top 100 list is kinda BS. Hill is the #1 player in the league? Lamar is # 2? McCaffery # 3 ? They are not even the best players at their positions. By your logic the Bills should try to trade JA # 12 on the list to the Cowboys for Dak #14 and Parsons #17. That would be a + 1 of players on the list. The offence scored the second most points, so they dont need much. Adding the man coverage beater is the only glaring issue. Is resigning Cooper and drafting a WR the answer, maybe. The D needs some help, but 2 DTs could be a big step, They could greatly improve the run defense, keep the LBs cleaner to make plays, and would likely help the pass rush. Adding stars is always sexy but requires a lot of resources. We would all love to see the Bills get Myles but with the draft capital and salary it may require, there may be nothing left to address the DT position or the outside CB position. At this time there is 1 starting CB on the last year of his deal and no other starter on the roster....

What belief? I dont understand what your trying to say.