mikemac2001

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/rush_yds_career.htm TD no idk how he got in ranked 55 in yards 6 seasons 1250 per season in yards 55 Terrell Davis+ 7,607 1995-2001 den

Zero point zero

And he is so quick and agile if he bounces it to the outside he has the advantage

I like the concept and it makes sense in a weird way it's getting it from a 7th to a 5th once you get there you have ammo

I agreed I should have said that ..but I felt cardale was cut since the new regime took over

It was a 7th or nothing I'll take the 7th maybe we trade it for a 2019 6th but atleast we have another chip to deal

Already my fantasy name

Juice is loose

Saturday nights in ATX. Trouble my friends

But what about his 4th qtr comebacks?

Yes they have a pay to stream option

Gilmore is soft or was soft for the bills he always seemed like a top corner giving half effort. He would grab and hold he would avoid contact. He is a good player but I'm glad we didn't over pay for someone who showed little heart for the bills

Fred Jackson vs Mike Tolbert One roster spot (if Tolbert even makes the team) I could see Fred beating him out

Hmmm

When is Uber coming to buffalo?

He's already admitted zay jones vs woods doesn't change the win loss and says even signing maclin won't change it

Not tanking But then gonna cut Holmes for a comp pick So it's a win win

Majbobby

So your saying or wr group will be similar to last year when your previously said they will be worse. Which you have agreed with multiple times woods/Zay won't affect the w/l record even adding maclin wouldn't change that.

So our wr group is similar to last years...and your saying adding maclin won't improve chances of winning games this year? 6 wins top with or without him?

So what's better for the bills right now you have just stated he records would be very similar with either WR So would you rather have a younger cheaper WR who will be with the team atleast 4 years or an expensive Wr who will get your team to the same spot. Same record for both WRs One is younger / cheaper / unproven One is older / cost more / didn't wow in the stat line /great in the run attack You have stated woods wouldn't change our record and if did it is minimal so he doesn't seem that valuable.

No I am asking If we go 6-10 with zay jones How many more wins will we have if we had woods instead Maybe your just back tracking now

So we are winning 4-6 more games this upcoming season if you remove zay jones and insert woods. You must be here to just stir stuff. That's laughable. And what's a healthy Sammy Watkins bring

So let's say we had woods instead of zay jones how many more games would we win

I had already answered it responding to each position 2 pages before And a healthy Sammy Watkins makes our WR group better then a WR group with an injured Sammy Watkins And if you don't want to search for it I will repeat it If zay can get similar production of woods then I think it's the same but who knows with a rookie. but a healthy sammy should open up a lot more and create more production