So what's better for the bills right now you have just stated he records would be very similar with either WR
So would you rather have a younger cheaper WR who will be with the team atleast 4 years or an expensive Wr who will get your team to the same spot.
Same record for both WRs
One is younger / cheaper / unproven
One is older / cost more / didn't wow in the stat line /great in the run attack
You have stated woods wouldn't change our record and if did it is minimal so he doesn't seem that valuable.