This bothers me just because we spend these resources tracking normal people selling a pair of tickets to single game. We are are chasing taxes on Venmo for garage sales. Just random people who earn like $60k per year making 200 bucks in their driveway 3 times per decade
But some people pay like a 4% tax rate on huge incomes
Unsure what to think here. GB is a very good team. Rodgers is playing out of his mind this year. I don’t really want to play them, but….
I am not thrilled to go head
to head with a team that shuts down Rodgers and keeps the game 7-3 half way through the 3rd.
It just feels like a similar match up to Indy.
Also agree. I’m not a huge Aikman fan in general. It just seems like he’s not a great commentator, and he tries to make up for it by being “edgy” and “critical” to show you how smart he is. But he just comes off like a grass hole
I mentioned it elsewhere. Even if my ticket levels out to $100 less than I paid, the $100 extra was basically insurance that I could afford to attend and I am cool that I did it.
The inverse, pricing skyrocketing, would hurt my soul.
I am a guy who believes in ju-ju and I think this thread errs on the side of OK. Nobody is chatting about Buffalo beating KC or looking past the divisional round. It’s just cost. Given the market right now some of us need to get tickets at the current price and can’t afford to wait until it’s official.
The difference for me between $2-300 now isn’t work the risk of tickets jumping to $400-500 and/or not affordable.
The $50-$100 you MIGHT save, if you get tickets at face value, just isn’t worth the risk of the price on the secondary market.
Really unsure how @benderbender can possibly disagree.
Tennessee is grass. You can’t see black pellets popping up because there aren’t any. It is literally impossible because it does t exist.
I WANT it to be an incompletion.
I THINK there isn’t enough to overturn one way or the other
EDIT: if it was ruled incompletion, I think it stays incomplete.