nedboy7

Samuel will be a big part this offense in the coming 2 years. I’m very high on him. I loved his game prior to joining the Bills.

She is actually someone with experience. How is this worse than Gaetz. I like the pick.

It’s sad to see so much stupidity in one thread.

Just riding Josh’s coattails ha? 😜

How many wins were you predicting before the season started.

Thats fine. They can just tweet it wasn’t real.

Appreciate the intelligence response. X is also where anyone can post with any identity and information they want. Like the rest of social media it’s a garbage can.

I did not realize this. Now I am outraged!

I am not a Dem but you morons can't fathom such a situation. You are either in the cult or out right? Go read some more X and tell me how it's real news.

So it’s not real cause it’s Politico. You’re bat ***** crazy and stupid. Whataboutism? Funny how that pops up when you got nothing. Losers.

I’m really enjoying the rebuild. Imagine once it’s rebuilt!

You all have such dignity and small memories. Donald Trump deliberately withheld disaster aid to states he deemed politically hostile and will do so again if he wins November’s election, former White House advisers have said. Mark Harvey, Trump’s former senior director for resilience policy, told E&E News that Trump initially refused to approve disaster aid in 2018 after deadly wildfires devastates California, historically a democratic-leaning state. The then-president only agreed after Harvey showed him that some heavily damaged counties had numerous Republican supporters. “We went as far as looking up how many votes he got in those impacted areas … to show him these are people who voted for you,” said Harvey. “There’s no empathy for the survivors. It is all about getting your photo-op, right? Disaster theater to make him look good.” According to E&E News, Trump’s disaster aid approval was heavily politicized in two other occasions: Hurricane Maria, which killed more than 3,000 people across Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands in 2017 and Hurricane Michael, which caused massive damage in Florida – a red state – a year later. In early September 2020, wildfires tore through eastern Washington state, obliterating tens of millions of dollars of property, displacing hundreds of rural residents and killing a 1-year-old boy. But then-President Donald Trump refused to act on Gov. Jay Inslee’s request for $37 million in federal disaster aid because of a bitter personal dispute with the Democratic governor, an investigation by POLITICO’s E&E News shows. Trump sat on Inslee’s request for the final four months of his presidency, delaying recovery and leaving communities unsure about rebuilding because nobody knew if they would get federal help. Trump ignored Inslee’s 73-page request even after the Federal Emergency Management Agency found during weeks of inspection that the wildfires easily met the federal damage threshold for disaster aid. “It really was an outrageous abuse of power,” Inslee said in a recent interview with E&E News. Trump’s campaign did not respond to E&E News’ questions.

I would have sent 13 burgers to Reid. You know the rest.....

64 Supreme court justices never went to law school. Many of the Supreme Court’s most important decisions involve matters of moral or political importance, not fine points of law. “Once we recognize that the Supreme Court is America’s authoritative faculty of political theorists and not a mere court of law, then we can readily see that the necessity for formal legal training is no greater for Supreme Court justices than for officers of the other branches of government,” wrote George Washington University law professor Arthur Miller and his associate Jeffrey Bowman in a 1986 Vanderbilt Law Review article, “Break the Monopoly of Lawyers on the Supreme Court.”

44 of the 111 justices have not had served as a judge. I assume you are talking about Kagan. I’m not sure about her qualifications. But AG is a little different. To be qualified for the position of Attorney General, a candidate typically needs a significant amount of legal experience, usually including several years of post-J.D. practice in complex litigation, substantial knowledge of constitutional law, and often experience in high-level legal advisory roles; this could translate to a decade or more of practice depending on the specific jurisdiction and the individual's career path. The Constitution doesn't specify any formal qualifications for a Supreme Court Justice. However, the Department of Justice and members of Congress have developed informal criteria. The American Bar Association says that a nominee should be a preeminent member of the legal profession with exceptional legal ability and experience.