Jump to content

stony

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,605

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by stony

  1. stony
    It's not that he's talented or not. He's a dbag who can't get along with teammates. First Clemson, now literally the only NFL team that thought he was worth a sniff. Pass.
  2. stony
    By how the report was detailed, it appears he was blasted out of his mind with no malicious intent. However, I don't doubt it was him. He'll be lucky to keep his job though, because NFL front offices are full of pussies who who keep women beaters over pot heads.
  3. stony
    This sounds more like Ryen Rusillo than Ryan Leaf.
  4. stony
    It's annoying because a) it's demonstrably false and b) it's a fair assumption this is the same line of thinking the Pegulas have based on their first two hires as HC.
  5. stony
    Does he believe it, or does he think fans want to hear this in Buffalo? It's Buffalo, not Patagonia. Someone show him some film of the offense in the 90s.
  6. stony
    If a tree falls in the woods and no one’s around. Does it make a sound?
  7. stony
    If true, it's actually my favorite part of the Pegula's approach to franchise ownership.
  8. stony
    Yup. Ivory ran the ball effectively, Anderson had more than enough time to pass. His fumble was because he's old/slow/rusty and was a half-step too late stepping up into the pocket.
  9. stony
    This game showed me the o-line isn't the problem. Anderson had time to throw. Hopefully JA learns this from the film.
  10. stony
    In NY, lump sum net would be ~$608M
  11. stony
    I'd prefer we seek to emulate the Kelly offenses of the 90s and not chase some misplaced stereotype of weather-beating run-first teams that never existed during those years. I'm not really sure Rex or McBeane watched any of those teams with the way they talk.
  12. stony
    Andrew Luck is one handsome SOB
  13. stony
    Nah, he's largely been very good this season. One 'off' game doesn't diminish his body of work imo.
  14. stony
    It was a crap throw.
  15. stony
    What is wrong with this? The owner has the right to dictate what goes on his/her property.
  16. stony
    Yeah, but I'm thinking he had a little premarital sex with the missus. You know what I'm saying...wink..wink..
  17. stony
    They are deeply "reactive" owners. Every hire appears to be the exact opposite of the person they are replacing. This limits the pool of hirable candidates.
  18. stony
    Darnold was the "guy" all along. I refuse to believe anything to the contrary. The Jets stole the march on us.
  19. stony
    It's not like they didn't have any film on him or anything.
  20. stony
    Absolutely nothing. And the people whining about it being a late hit should probably watch baseball.
  21. stony
    Tatteltail
  22. stony
    Don't be such a boy scout. You don't get to RFA status around here if you don't slander or defame ones character.
  23. stony
    Fair enough. Still think we're an interesting proposition for an unsigned backup come week 5.
  24. stony
    So all these backups are holding out week 5 for a starting shot and more money? Stupid agents...
  25. stony
    He's been an easy target for scorn, but he's got a future here. Been the least of the offense's problems this season.
×
×
  • Create New...