jimmy10

Trust that instinct.

You poor dear! You know what? You should ask for your money back!

Pretty much everything until about two days ago.

It's the result of the "everybody gets a trophy" mentality, and so they think their tiresome, rehashed take is Finally the One. They say they don't want to wade through "50 pages" in one thread, while the rest of us don't want to wade through 50 threads with such nuanced topics as: "CUT TYROD NOW!!!" "CUT TYROD TOMORROW!1!" "FOR ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES HERES MY TAEK ON WHY WE SHOULDVE CUT TRYOD YESTERDAY!ELEVENTY!1"

If you're not right, then your name isn't fansINce88!

The rational? Well, it's typically any number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q.

I bet they're: ¡INcreíble!

Best idea yet by any of the meat.

I'll take the under... ...I win.

I'm with you. It's just the internet, and I don't know any of you people, so who really gives an F, but the things I strongly disliked about that other board I'm already seeing pop up here. The only thing I can hope for is SDS and his deputies running a tight ship, as they always have.

Oh, that's a perfectly valid point, one made many times on this board. Which further underscores the utter lack of need for a new thread on the same topic.

So the take here demanding a new thread is that: 1. Tyrod is not the guy. 2. The guy may be in the draft. 3.) But that guy may not make an immediate impact. 4.) So therefore keep drafting QBs until we find the guy. 5.) But in the meantime, cut Tyrod because he's not the guy, even though the guy is not immediately apparent. 6.) And there's no way we can continue with Tyrod while on a parallel track bringing up a drafted QB? Dazzling take, really well done.

Fascinating. I thought QB was a settled issue for the Bills. Good thing we have all these new contributors.

Lol. You just named one of the best features about this place. I had no idea BBMB had any such policy, that place was in such disarray in so many ways.

And a three-year waiting period to be able to start new threads.

Amen. Preach it. Mm-hmm. ...and then all the rest of this too. I ran from the BBMB to here for pretty much all the reasons covered above. If anyone can maintain some sense of quality and decorum, SDS, it's you.

I migrated here after realizing TSW's average fifth grade reading level was better than the BB.com message boards average potato reading level.

Sweet. They carry over like cell phone minutes, right?

http://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2017/02/fred_jackson_wants_to_play_in_2017_and_eventually_retire_with_buffalo_bills.html "If playing in 2017 isn't in the cards, Jackson wants to retire with the Bills. Jackson showed no ill will towards the Bills for releasing him in 2015 and talked about signing a one-day deal with Buffalo as the Bills Mafia made him who he is today."

Attention whoring. Getcher 15 minutes of fame, on any scale, by whatever means necessary.

Why should we trust this "John Wawrow" if that's even his real name?

I get that reference. Again, per my avatar.

Yeah, but is he high-motor? A lunch pail, gym rat kind of player?

Per my avatar, this is very relevant to my interests.

WE ARE BONED EITHER WAY. WOE IS ME. HOLD MY BEER.